anlak storytelling
All kinds
Document kinds
Loading document kinds...

Primary corpus lens for browsing and insights. Selection lives in the URL.

All formats
Orientation
Loading formats...

Landscape, portrait, square, or unknown document geometry.

Unlock
slides · global inventory

All filtered slides

Global slide inventory for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.

Search Insights JSON Unlock
Corpus coverage

319,975 slides

319,974 are described (100%), so the treemap can explain the corpus instead of just counting files.

Total slides
319,975
Described
319,974
Pending
1

Slide type composition

dynamicclickable
Slide type

Showing 319,974 described slides — 100.0% of 319,975 rendered pages

+Context & problem43,76713.7% · 6,592 docs+Data & charts72,62022.7% · 8,666 docs+Meta & navigation45,93614.4% · 9,739 docs+Recommend & act67,04121.0% · 9,324 docs+Cases & evidence31,2569.8% · 6,067 docs+Frameworks2,1230.7% · 1,232 docs+Appendix35,68211.2% · 6,614 docs+Other21,5496.7% · 5,566 docs

Tile area is proportional to slide count. Click a category to open its subtype map.

all document kinds · all orientations
18 30 60

Slide collection

141,301-141,360 of 319,975

filter-aware
09
The slide uses a dual-chart layout to demonstrate the inverse relationship between rising operating expenses and falling EBITDA margins.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem (Identify pain)1 hit
10
The slide uses a red arrow to visually emphasize the downward trend.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem (Identify pain)1 hit
11
Includes a quote from CFO Arthur Minson regarding the growth strategy.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)1 hit
12
Uses a before-after-framing style to contrast management's narrative with actual performance.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)1 hit
13
Uses a dual-chart layout to contrast investment spend vs. enterprise value decline.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)1 hit
14
The slide uses a red box to highlight the specific Display segments (Free Premium Content and Patch) that are driving the losses.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)1 hit
15
The chart uses a downward-sloping arrow to emphasize the negative trend in losses.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)1 hit
16
Uses CEO quotes to frame the 'status quo' as stubbornness.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)1 hit
17
This is a transition or thesis-setting slide in an activist deck.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)1 hit
18
The slide uses red bars to highlight AOL's specific metrics within the competitive set.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)1 hit
19
Uses a waterfall-style bar chart to show revenue vs EBITDA losses over three years.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)1 hit
20
Uses a comparison table to contrast a profitable peer with the target company's loss-making segments.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)1 hit
21
Uses CNET as a precedent for profitability in display-heavy business models.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
22
The slide uses a red circle annotation to emphasize the $1.1B expense figure.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
23
Includes a CEO quote used to support the activist's argument.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
24
Uses a before-after framework to highlight the negative impact of AOL's management strategy.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
25
Uses a waterfall chart to demonstrate capital inefficiency in AOL's acquisition strategy.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
26
This is a transition or thesis slide used to set the stage for a critique of the Patch business.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
27
The slide uses screenshots to demonstrate the product's geographic reach and local content focus.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
28
The slide uses a table to compare 'Display - Free Premium Content' against 'Display - Patch' to isolate the negative impact of the Patch acquisition.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
29
The slide uses a quote from a former employee to validate the activist's thesis.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
30
Includes a testimonial/quote from a former employee to support the argument.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
31
Uses a series of quotes from earnings calls to highlight the discrepancy between guidance and actual spend.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
32
Uses a waterfall-style chart to show revenue vs EBITDA losses.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
33
Uses former employee quotes to validate the performance gap.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
34
Uses testimonials to humanize the data point.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
35
Includes a screenshot of Google AdWords interface showing specific Patch placements.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
36
Uses a quote as a primary evidence point to support the contradiction argument.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
37
Uses a 100% stacked bar chart to show 0% positive response from a small sample size of 11 advertisers.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
38
Uses a bar chart to emphasize a 0% vs 100% result.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
39
The slide uses wireframe diagrams to illustrate ad slot pricing.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
40
The slide uses a 'Target Case' P&L table to demonstrate structural unprofitability.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
41
Uses a CEO quote to frame the guidance as insufficient.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
42
Uses a screenshot of AOL.com to demonstrate that a generic online retailer (VON VONNI) advertises on the platform, suggesting Patch's ad revenue is not necessarily tied to local Patch-specific demand.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
43
The slide uses a hub-and-spoke diagram to link a central ad source to multiple local news sites.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
44
Uses a series of bulleted arguments to dismantle management's claims regarding revenue and profitability.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
45
Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slidesStarboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
46
Includes a specific callout to the $300M loss figure and a table comparing Display vs Display+Search performance.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
47
Uses a hub-and-spoke diagram to visualize traffic flow to AOL.com.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
48
Uses a simple flow diagram to illustrate the lack of connection between Patch and AOL search traffic.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
49
The slide uses a bar chart to contrast engagement metrics, directly challenging the company's stated strategic rationale.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
50
The slide uses a rhetorical question to challenge the assumption that content ownership is a prerequisite for search utility.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
51
Uses the ceo-quote-contradiction framework to undermine management's narrative.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
52
The slide uses a red box to highlight the negative EBITDA and margins of the Display segments.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
53
Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slidesStarboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
54
Uses an 'Independent Peer Group' to contrast with AOL's existing peer group.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
55
Uses authority-citation to validate the activist's claims against the target company.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
56
Includes a screenshot of an ISS Proxy Alert report from 2010.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
57
Includes a visual excerpt of the original Glass Lewis proxy paper with a red circle highlighting the 'Poor' rating.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
58
Highlights the risk of 'cherry-picking' larger peers to inflate compensation.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
59
The slide uses a scatter plot with a broken axis to show the outlier status of the peer group compared to the guidelines.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
60
The slide uses red boxes to highlight 'NO' entries, visually emphasizing the failure to meet guidelines.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
61
The slide uses red circles to highlight the 'Multiple of AOL' for market cap, emphasizing the extreme disparity.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
62
Uses direct quotes from a proxy paper to establish a precedent for peer group scrutiny.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
63
The chart uses a broken axis for the Y-axis (Revenue) and X-axis (Market Cap) to accommodate outliers like Microsoft and Google.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
64
The slide highlights that AOL's peer group selection is biased towards larger companies, failing standard proxy advisor guidelines.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
65
Uses red circles to highlight the extreme market cap multiples.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
66
The slide uses a table to contrast AOL's metrics with a peer group mean/median, highlighting that the new group is more representative.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
67
The chart uses a blue dashed box to highlight the target range for peer selection.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
68
The slide uses a green border to highlight the 'Independent Peer Group' row as the compliant option.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit