Corpus coverage

319,975 slides

319,974 are described (100%), so the treemap can explain the corpus instead of just counting files.

Total slides
319,975
Described
319,974
Pending
1

Slide type composition

dynamicclickable
Slide type

Showing 319,974 described slides — 100.0% of 319,975 rendered pages

Tile area is proportional to slide count. Click a category to open its subtype map.

all document kinds · all orientations

Slide collection

309,619-309,636 of 319,975

filter-aware
06
The chart uses a waterfall structure to decompose total per-pupil spending into specific categories like central office, SPED, and school-level support.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
07
The slide uses a numbered list format to categorize four distinct strategic pillars for financial and operational improvement.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
08
The chart uses a combination of a bar chart for school programs and a line chart for student population to illustrate the mismatch.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
09
The chart is a descending bar chart representing school capacity.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
10
The chart is a sorted bar chart (waterfall-like) showing individual school utilization rates.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
11
The slide uses a horizontal bar chart to compare Boston against 17 other districts, with a vertical line indicating the peer average of 16.3.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
12
The slide uses external benchmarking to validate a financial hypothesis.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
13
The slide uses a table to illustrate the financial impact of school consolidation, showing prior costs versus expected post-consolidation costs.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
14
28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
15
28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
16
The slide uses a hierarchical tree diagram to decompose the $265m total SPED spending.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
17
The chart displays a long list of schools on the y-axis with corresponding classification percentages on the x-axis.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
18
The scatter plot shows a positive correlation between FARM (socioeconomic status) and SPED rates, with Boston as an outlier.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
19
The slide uses a two-column layout to contrast the 'why' (benefits) with the 'how' (implementation plan).28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
20
The table uses a heatmap-style color coding (red/orange to green) to indicate cost impact.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations Loop · Hypothesis Test1 hit
21
Uses a waterfall-style comparison between current state and steady state for three different modeling assumptions.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations Loop · Hypothesis Test1 hit
22
Uses a gap analysis approach to contrast current state vs desired state.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
23
Includes both qualitative quotes and quantitative survey data.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations 1 hit