slides · global inventory
All filtered slides
Global slide inventory for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Corpus coverage
319,975 slides
319,974 are described (100%), so the treemap can explain the corpus instead of just counting files.
- Total slides
- 319,975
- Described
- 319,974
- Pending
- 1
100%ready for canon
Slide type composition
dynamicclickable
Slide type
Showing 319,974 described slides — 100.0% of 319,975 rendered pages
+Context & problem43,76713.7% · 6,592 docs+Data & charts72,62022.7% · 8,666 docs+Meta & navigation45,93614.4% · 9,739 docs+Recommend & act67,04121.0% · 9,324 docs+Cases & evidence31,2569.8% · 6,067 docs+Frameworks2,1230.7% · 1,232 docs+Appendix35,68211.2% · 6,614 docs+Other21,5496.7% · 5,566 docs
Tile area is proportional to slide count. Click a category to open its subtype map.
all document kinds · all orientations
Slide collection
309,619-309,636 of 319,975
06
The chart uses a waterfall structure to decompose total per-pupil spending into specific categories like central office, SPED, and school-level support.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
07
The slide uses a numbered list format to categorize four distinct strategic pillars for financial and operational improvement.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
08
The chart uses a combination of a bar chart for school programs and a line chart for student population to illustrate the mismatch.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
09
The chart is a descending bar chart representing school capacity.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
10
The chart is a sorted bar chart (waterfall-like) showing individual school utilization rates.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
11
The slide uses a horizontal bar chart to compare Boston against 17 other districts, with a vertical line indicating the peer average of 16.3.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
12
The slide uses external benchmarking to validate a financial hypothesis.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
13
The slide uses a table to illustrate the financial impact of school consolidation, showing prior costs versus expected post-consolidation costs.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
14
28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
15
28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
16
The slide uses a hierarchical tree diagram to decompose the $265m total SPED spending.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
17
The chart displays a long list of schools on the y-axis with corresponding classification percentages on the x-axis.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
18
The scatter plot shows a positive correlation between FARM (socioeconomic status) and SPED rates, with Boston as an outlier.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
19
The slide uses a two-column layout to contrast the 'why' (benefits) with the 'how' (implementation plan).28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
20
The table uses a heatmap-style color coding (red/orange to green) to indicate cost impact.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations Loop · Hypothesis Test1 hit
21
Uses a waterfall-style comparison between current state and steady state for three different modeling assumptions.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations Loop · Hypothesis Test1 hit
22
Uses a gap analysis approach to contrast current state vs desired state.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
23
Includes both qualitative quotes and quantitative survey data.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations 1 hit