anlak storytelling
All kinds
Document kinds
Loading document kinds...

Primary corpus lens for browsing and insights. Selection lives in the URL.

All formats
Orientation
Loading formats...

Landscape, portrait, square, or unknown document geometry.

Unlock
slides · global inventory

All filtered slides

Global slide inventory for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.

Search Insights JSON Unlock
Corpus coverage

319,975 slides

319,974 are described (100%), so the treemap can explain the corpus instead of just counting files.

Total slides
319,975
Described
319,974
Pending
1

Slide type composition

dynamicclickable
Slide type

Showing 319,974 described slides — 100.0% of 319,975 rendered pages

+Context & problem43,76713.7% · 6,592 docs+Data & charts72,62022.7% · 8,666 docs+Meta & navigation45,93614.4% · 9,739 docs+Recommend & act67,04121.0% · 9,324 docs+Cases & evidence31,2569.8% · 6,067 docs+Frameworks2,1230.7% · 1,232 docs+Appendix35,68211.2% · 6,614 docs+Other21,5496.7% · 5,566 docs

Tile area is proportional to slide count. Click a category to open its subtype map.

all document kinds · all orientations
18 30 60

Slide collection

27,865-27,882 of 319,975

filter-aware
06
Data source: Ipsos Public Trust in AI, March 2024. Base: All UK adults 16+ (n=5,150).PUBLIC TRUST IN AI: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND REGULATION · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
07
Data source: Ipsos Iris. Base sizes provided for work and general population.PUBLIC TRUST IN AI: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND REGULATION · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
08
PUBLIC TRUST IN AI: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND REGULATIONPUBLIC TRUST IN AI: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND REGULATION · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
09
The chart is a stacked bar chart representing survey responses across three categories: Benefit, Equal measure, and Lose out.PUBLIC TRUST IN AI: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND REGULATION · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
10
Data source: Ipsos AI Monitor 2024. Base: All adults 16+ (n=5,098).PUBLIC TRUST IN AI: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND REGULATION · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
11
The chart uses clustering (Anglosphere, Europe, More Positive) to group countries by sentiment.PUBLIC TRUST IN AI: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND REGULATION · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
12
The chart displays a clear divergence in public sentiment based on the utility vs. intrusiveness of the AI application.PUBLIC TRUST IN AI: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND REGULATION · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
13
The chart displays comfort vs discomfort levels for 7 specific AI use cases.PUBLIC TRUST IN AI: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND REGULATION · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
14
Data source: Ipsos Public Trust in AI, September 2024.PUBLIC TRUST IN AI: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND REGULATION · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
15
PUBLIC TRUST IN AI: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND REGULATIONPUBLIC TRUST IN AI: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND REGULATION · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
16
PUBLIC TRUST IN AI: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND REGULATIONPUBLIC TRUST IN AI: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND REGULATION · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
17
PUBLIC TRUST IN AI: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND REGULATIONPUBLIC TRUST IN AI: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND REGULATION · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
18
The slide presents two stacked bar charts comparing AI usage expectations versus AI replacement expectations.PUBLIC TRUST IN AI: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND REGULATION · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
19
Data source: Ipsos, March 2024. Base: All UK adults 16+ who are in work or looking for work (n=2,681).PUBLIC TRUST IN AI: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND REGULATION · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
20
PUBLIC TRUST IN AI: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND REGULATIONPUBLIC TRUST IN AI: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND REGULATION · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
21
PUBLIC TRUST IN AI: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND REGULATIONPUBLIC TRUST IN AI: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND REGULATION · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
22
PUBLIC TRUST IN AI: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND REGULATIONPUBLIC TRUST IN AI: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND REGULATION · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
23
Data source: Ipsos, March 2024. Base: All UK adults 16+ who are in work (n=2,506).PUBLIC TRUST IN AI: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND REGULATION · Ipsos
Consulting deck Industry analyst Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit