slides · global inventory
All filtered slides
Global slide inventory for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Corpus coverage
319,975 slides
319,974 are described (100%), so the treemap can explain the corpus instead of just counting files.
- Total slides
- 319,975
- Described
- 319,974
- Pending
- 1
100%ready for canon
Slide type composition
dynamicclickable
Slide type
Showing 319,974 described slides — 100.0% of 319,975 rendered pages
+Context & problem43,76713.7% · 6,592 docs+Data & charts72,62022.7% · 8,666 docs+Meta & navigation45,93614.4% · 9,739 docs+Recommend & act67,04121.0% · 9,324 docs+Cases & evidence31,2569.8% · 6,067 docs+Frameworks2,1230.7% · 1,232 docs+Appendix35,68211.2% · 6,614 docs+Other21,5496.7% · 5,566 docs
Tile area is proportional to slide count. Click a category to open its subtype map.
all document kinds · all orientations
Slide collection
23,815-23,832 of 319,975
17
The slide uses a hub-and-spoke model to represent an ecosystem of microservices.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
18
The slide uses a maturity-model-like progression from monolithic suites to best-of-breed ecosystems.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
19
The diagram maps a procurement process from user request to delivery, highlighting the role of a centralized AI data hub.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
20
The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind?The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
21
The chart uses a treemap layout to represent market size by spend volume, with color-coding to distinguish governance requirements.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
22
The slide uses a 2x2 matrix to categorize vendors. It includes annotations explaining the characteristics of each quadrant.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
23
The chart is a Spend Matters SolutionMap, a proprietary vendor positioning framework.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
24
The diagram uses a Venn-like overlapping structure to show process integration.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
25
The slide uses a horizontal process flow to contrast basic P2P hygiene with advanced capabilities.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
26
The slide contrasts 'Functional Silos' and 'Technology Islands' with an integrated 'Sirion' platform.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
27
The diagram uses a hub-and-spoke circular layout to represent an integrated ecosystem of contract management functions.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
28
The slide uses a bubble/proportional representation to show the relationship between total invoice amount and achieved savings.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Quick Win Big Bet1 hit
29
The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind?The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Quick Win Big Bet1 hit
30
The slide uses a 2x2 matrix to show organizational evolution.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
31
The chart displays 10 categories of skills, each with three data points (Increase, Stay the same, Decrease).The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
32
The slide uses a process flow diagram to illustrate the stages of change and the common failure point.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
33
Outperforming companies are those that achieved 100% or more of their ambition; the right-hand chart represents an analysis of the relative importance of each factor. Source: Bain Risk History Survey, 2018 (n=426)The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
34
The slide contains only a large question mark surrounded by a circle of dots and the SirionLabs logo.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit