Corpus coverage

319,975 slides

319,974 are described (100%), so the treemap can explain the corpus instead of just counting files.

Total slides
319,975
Described
319,974
Pending
1

Slide type composition

dynamicclickable
Slide type

Showing 319,974 described slides — 100.0% of 319,975 rendered pages

Tile area is proportional to slide count. Click a category to open its subtype map.

all document kinds · all orientations

Slide collection

22,915-22,932 of 319,975

filter-aware
33
The chart uses a waterfall structure to decompose the net change in volume between two points in time.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
34
Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
35
Uses Harvey balls to represent qualitative scores for service improvements.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
36
Uses Harvey balls to represent qualitative scores for improvement drivers.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
37
Uses Harvey balls to represent improvement scores.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
38
Uses Harvey balls to represent scores for online advertising improvements.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
39
Uses Harvey balls to represent qualitative scores for online ad improvements.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
40
Uses Harvey balls to represent qualitative scores for online advertising improvements.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
41
BCG logo present. Internet survey, n=1736.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
01
Slide 1
Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011)Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
02
Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011)Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
03
The slide outlines the mandate from ORR, ATOC, and Network Rail, and clarifies the relationship with the McNulty Rail VfM review.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
04
The table acts as a decision matrix for the four selected options.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
05
The slide presents a structured comparison of four policy options for financial risk/reward sharing in the rail industry.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
06
The slide continues a list of options, starting from number 5.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
07
The slide lists specific criteria and the corresponding key questions used for evaluation.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
08
The slide serves as a methodological disclosure for an executive summary section.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
09
The table uses a qualitative scoring system (++, +, 0, -, --) to evaluate options.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit