anlak storytelling
All kinds
Document kinds
Loading document kinds...

Primary corpus lens for browsing and insights. Selection lives in the URL.

All formats
Orientation
Loading formats...

Landscape, portrait, square, or unknown document geometry.

Unlock
slides · global inventory

Action Titles

Tool collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.

Search Insights JSON Unlock
Matching slides 13,809
Current window 1,831-1,860
Pages 461
Rows per page 30
Tool: Action Titlesclear collectionreset all
18 30 60

Tool

1,831-1,860 of 13,809

filter-aware
19
The slide uses a table structure to map specific policy levers to their rationales, with numbered categories (1, 4, 5) indicating their place in a broader framework.Port of LA Clean Truck Program · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Build Up1 hit
20
The slide uses a table structure to define the mechanics of a policy option. Red text indicates changes from a previous option.Port of LA Clean Truck Program · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Build Up1 hit
03
US Mail Volumes to 2020US Mail Volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & ContextLoop · Mece Breakdown1 hit
05
The slide uses a two-column layout to contrast First-Class Mail and Standard Mail, with visual examples for each sub-segment.US Mail Volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & ContextLoop · Mece Breakdown1 hit
06
The chart uses a Marimekko (mosaic) plot to visualize volume distribution across multiple categorical dimensions.US Mail Volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & ContextLoop · Mece Breakdown1 hit
08
US Mail Volumes to 2020US Mail Volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
09
The chart uses a BCG-branded background. It highlights a -1.5% annual decline rate.US Mail Volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
10
Uses green arrows for positive trends and red arrows for negative trends for USPS.US Mail Volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
11
The chart uses a dual-line forecast (Sender vs Consumer perspective) and compares it against a worst-case EU benchmark.US Mail Volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
12
The chart shows a sharp decline after 2008 and projects three distinct recovery paths through 2020.US Mail Volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
13
The chart uses a Marimekko (mosaic) layout to show volume distribution across segments and sender types.US Mail Volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
14
The slide uses a dark green background typical of BCG decks. It presents qualitative evidence to support a quantitative trend.US Mail Volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · So What Cascade1 hit
16
The slide uses a dual-chart layout to demonstrate a causal link between broadband adoption and mail volume decline across multiple countries.US Mail Volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Benchmark Gap1 hit
17
The chart uses a regression line with an R-squared value of 0.57 to illustrate the relationship.US Mail Volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Benchmark Gap1 hit
19
The slide uses a dark green background typical of BCG decks. It includes a specific callout for the -44% change in First-Class Mail revenue.US Mail Volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
20
The matrix uses a 3x3 grid to show volume outcomes. Callouts provide context for the extreme scenarios (top-right and bottom-left).US Mail Volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
21
Uses a simple binary classification (positive/negative) for various risk/opportunity factors.US Mail Volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
22
The slide uses a 2x2-like matrix structure to contrast 'Conventional' vs 'Structural' changes across revenue and cost dimensions.US Mail Volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Precedent1 hit
23
The slide uses a two-column layout to contrast implemented changes versus proposed changes in postal delivery frequency and scope.US Mail Volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Precedent1 hit
26
The chart illustrates the net impact of growth factors (Mail rebound, Organic growth) and diversion factors (Autopay, Online/Mobile presentment) on total volume.US Mail Volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Waterfall Value1 hit
27
The chart shows a starting volume of 14.4B in 2009 and an ending volume of 11.0B in 2020, with various positive and negative drivers in between.US Mail Volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Waterfall Value1 hit
28
The chart shows a net decrease from 8.5B to 4.5B, with various positive and negative drivers.US Mail Volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Waterfall Value1 hit
29
The chart uses a waterfall structure to show how various factors (Mail rebound, Organic growth, Autopay, etc.) contribute to the net change in payment volume.US Mail Volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Waterfall Value1 hit
30
The chart shows a net decrease from 11.4B to 8.0B units, with positive drivers (rebound, growth, targeting) and negative drivers (shift to standard, online, email).US Mail Volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Waterfall Value1 hit
31
The chart illustrates a bridge from 32.1B to 38.0B units.US Mail Volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Waterfall Value1 hit
32
The chart illustrates a bridge from 2009 volume to 2020 volume, highlighting specific growth and decline drivers.US Mail Volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Waterfall Value1 hit
33
The chart illustrates how various factors (rebound, growth, online, targeting, mobile, TV) contribute to the net change in volume.US Mail Volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Waterfall Value1 hit
35
Uses Harvey balls to represent improvement scores for various online service features.US Mail Volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Voice Of Customer1 hit
36
Uses Harvey balls to represent scores for various service improvements.US Mail Volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Voice Of Customer1 hit
37
Uses Harvey balls to represent survey scores for service improvements.US Mail Volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Voice Of Customer1 hit