Matching slides 9,820
Current window 2,881-2,910
Pages 328
Rows per page 30
Slide function: Compare Peersclear collectionreset all

Slide function

2,881-2,910 of 9,820

filter-aware
13
The slide uses horizontal bar charts to visualize market dominance.General Electric (GE) · Trian Partners
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
14
The chart highlights GE's R&D spending advantage, including a visual representation of the Alstom acquisition impact.General Electric (GE) · Trian Partners
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
15
The slide uses a visual split to contrast commodity-like industrial goods with high-tech GE assets.General Electric (GE) · Trian Partners
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
16
The chart highlights GE's significantly higher backlog ratio compared to peers.General Electric (GE) · Trian Partners
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
17
The chart highlights GE in blue and includes a dashed line representing the peer average (excluding GE).General Electric (GE) · Trian Partners
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
18
The chart uses a dashed line to indicate the peer average of 25%.General Electric (GE) · Trian Partners
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
22
The chart highlights GE's relative stability (5% decline) versus the peer average (30% decline).General Electric (GE) · Trian Partners
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
27
GE is highlighted in yellow boxes across all three timeframes to emphasize its low ranking.General Electric (GE) · Trian Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · ProblemLoop · Before After1 hit
28
The chart uses indexed values starting at 1.00 in 2004. The CAGR labels emphasize the divergence in growth rates.General Electric (GE) · Trian Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · ProblemLoop · Before After1 hit
39
The chart highlights the disparity between GE Industrial's performance and GE Capital's performance, using a median benchmark line.General Electric (GE) · Trian Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
50
The chart highlights GE's performance relative to Siemens, Mitsubishi, Rolls-Royce, Pratt & Whitney, and Philips.General Electric (GE) · Trian Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution1 hit
51
The chart segments peers into 'Higher technology product offerings' and 'Lower technology product offerings' to contextualize the margin variance.General Electric (GE) · Trian Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution1 hit
57
Uses a dual-chart layout to show absolute dollar costs and percentage of revenue.General Electric (GE) · Trian Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution1 hit
62
The slide uses a hypothetical scenario to demonstrate the benefit of capital structure optimization.General Electric (GE) · Trian Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Quick Win Big Bet1 hit
73
The slide uses a combination of a peer comparison table and a time-series chart to justify a valuation premium.General Electric (GE) · Trian Partners
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
74
The chart uses a dashed line to indicate the 13% average premium.General Electric (GE) · Trian Partners
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
12
Uses a before-and-after comparison framework to critique CEO performance.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose Contradiction1 hit
20
P&G is highlighted with a red dashed box in all three charts to emphasize its position at the bottom of the peer group.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
21
P&G is highlighted with a red dashed box in each chart to emphasize its position.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
22
The slide uses a combination of a time-series bar chart and a ranked peer comparison bar chart to highlight underperformance.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Pattern Hunter1 hit
23
Includes a table of average volume growth during the CEO's tenure and a callout quantifying the performance gap.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Pattern Hunter1 hit
25
Includes a specific callout for Core EPS (as Reported) as the most comparable metric.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Pattern Hunter1 hit
26
Uses a 'villain' framing by contrasting P&G's excuse (currency) with peers who performed better despite similar/worse currency impacts.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
27
Highlights P&G's poor performance relative to peers in dividend growth and payout ratio expansion.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
36
Uses a combination of bar charts and a callout box to quantify the 'implied operating profit opportunity'.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
41
The slide uses a butterfly chart layout to correlate market share decline with revenue scale.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
46
The slide uses a contrast-pair framework to argue for organizational restructuring.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
52
Includes a quote from P&G's 2016 Analyst Day to expose a contradiction between their claims and actual performance.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
55
The slide uses a before-after framing to demonstrate that cost-cutting does not necessarily hinder growth.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
57
Includes a preemptive rebuttal box clarifying that Trian is not advocating for R&D cuts.The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) · Nelson Peltz
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit