slides · global inventory
Analyze Data
Slide function collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Matching slides 58,039
Current window 2,731-2,760
Pages 1,935
Rows per page 30
Slide function
2,731-2,760 of 58,039
24
The slide uses a checkmark system to indicate supplier counts per product, with blue highlighting for products failing the target criteria.Global Health Partnerships Stop TB · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Mece Breakdown1 hit
07
The chart uses a waterfall structure to isolate the impact of policy on electricity demand projections.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
08
The chart uses a 'Policy Off' scenario. CAGR values are provided for specific sectors.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
18
The slide uses a table format to compare various abatement measures across three key metrics.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
19
The slide uses a waterfall-style layout for the electricity savings column. The 'Share of sector potential' is highlighted for Motors (26%) and Pumps (40%).UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
20
The table uses a mix of bar charts and numerical data to compare different industrial efficiency levers.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
21
The slide uses a matrix layout to visualize sensitivity analysis.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
22
The slide uses a 3x3 matrix to demonstrate sensitivity, highlighting that discount rate changes have a larger impact on abatement cost than CO2 price changes.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
26
The slide uses a color-coded matrix to indicate the extent of policy coverage for specific energy efficiency measures.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
27
The slide uses a color-coded bubble system to indicate the percentage of potential captured.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
30
The slide highlights that broad policies like EU ETS have limited incremental impact on electricity demand once overlaps are accounted for.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
40
The slide uses a color-coded matrix to map policy effectiveness against specific barrier types for various building sectors.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
51
Includes two testimonials from electricity-intensive users.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
64
The slide uses pie charts to visualize percentage distributions of electricity consumption.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
66
The slide uses a methodology box to cite data sources for residential and services sectors.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
67
Data based on 2010 figures (104 TWh total).UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
68
The slide presents two line charts comparing different scenarios against a DECC 'policy off' baseline.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
69
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to compare DECC 2010 actuals with 2010 and 2030 projections, detailing the methodology and key drivers.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
70
The chart uses a stacked bar format to show sectoral breakdown of TWh consumption.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
71
Includes methodology notes and key drivers for the projected increase in electricity demand.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
78
The slide provides context for sensitivity analysis performed in later slides.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
79
The chart illustrates the convergence of traded and non-traded carbon costs by 2030.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
80
The slide contrasts production costs (societal) with retail prices (private sector) and highlights the impact of cogeneration in industrial settings.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
82
The slide provides technical assumptions for energy efficiency modeling in residential buildings.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
83
This is a technical appendix slide providing the underlying assumptions for a model.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
06
The slide uses a bar chart to show volume changes and callouts for percentage shifts, with a secondary metric for margin contribution.USPS Envisioning Americas Future Postal · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
08
The slide uses broken-axis symbols on both charts to indicate non-zero baselines.USPS Future Business Model · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
12
The chart is an area chart showing total volume decline from 177 billion to 150 billion pieces.USPS Future Business Model · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
17
Base Case: Workforce cost projection. Includes OPM estimates and P.L. 109-435 data.USPS Future Business Model · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
01
McKinsey & Company branding present.USPS Selected Slides · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & ContextLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit