Matching slides 14,162
Current window 13,681-13,710
Pages 473
Rows per page 30
Slide function: Expose Contradictionclear collectionreset all

Slide function

13,681-13,710 of 14,162

filter-aware
23
The slide uses a dual-axis line chart and a summary table to imply a conflict of interest.Ancora RB Ritchebros Presentation February 2023 · ancora-rb-ritchebros-presentation-february-2023
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
24
The slide uses a 'before-after' or 'claim-fact' structure to undermine the activist's credibility.Ancora RB Ritchebros Presentation February 2023 · ancora-rb-ritchebros-presentation-february-2023
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
25
Uses a classic 'Claim vs. Fact' layout to dismantle an activist's argument.Ancora RB Ritchebros Presentation February 2023 · ancora-rb-ritchebros-presentation-february-2023
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
26
Uses a 'before-after' or 'claim-fact' structure to debunk an activist's argument.Ancora RB Ritchebros Presentation February 2023 · ancora-rb-ritchebros-presentation-february-2023
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
27
Uses a before-after-framing style to contrast activist claims with factual rebuttal.Ancora RB Ritchebros Presentation February 2023 · ancora-rb-ritchebros-presentation-february-2023
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
28
Uses a split-screen layout to contrast an activist's claim (left) with the company's rebuttal (right).Ancora RB Ritchebros Presentation February 2023 · ancora-rb-ritchebros-presentation-february-2023
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
29
The slide uses a 'before-after' style layout to contrast Luxor's claims (left) with the rebuttal facts (right).Ancora RB Ritchebros Presentation February 2023 · ancora-rb-ritchebros-presentation-february-2023
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
03
Uses a 3-column comparison matrix to highlight management's hypocrisy over time.Bilgari Cracker Barrel Presentation October 2020 · bilgari-cracker-barrel-presentation-october-2020
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
11
The slide uses two charts to demonstrate data manipulation: one showing the impact of date selection on TSR, and another showing peer comparison performance.Bilgari Cracker Barrel Presentation October 2020 · bilgari-cracker-barrel-presentation-october-2020
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
13
Uses a before-after framing to debunk a specific shareholder letter claim.Bilgari Cracker Barrel Presentation October 2020 · bilgari-cracker-barrel-presentation-october-2020
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
15
The slide uses a 'Strategy vs Results vs Performance vs Our View' framework to critique management's execution.Bilgari Cracker Barrel Presentation October 2020 · bilgari-cracker-barrel-presentation-october-2020
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
16
Uses a before-after framing to contrast management's stated goals with actual results.Bilgari Cracker Barrel Presentation October 2020 · bilgari-cracker-barrel-presentation-october-2020
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
19
Uses a 'Result: Failed' red banner across all three columns to emphasize underperformance.Bilgari Cracker Barrel Presentation October 2020 · bilgari-cracker-barrel-presentation-october-2020
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
22
The slide uses a contrast-pair framework to highlight the lack of return on invested capital.Bilgari Cracker Barrel Presentation October 2020 · bilgari-cracker-barrel-presentation-october-2020
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
26
The slide uses a contrast between the initial ambitious long-term plan and the eventual failure to secure financing to argue against the brand's viability.Bilgari Cracker Barrel Presentation October 2020 · bilgari-cracker-barrel-presentation-october-2020
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
28
Uses analyst quotes and a SunTrust Robinson Humphrey research note to undermine the strategic rationale of the deal.Bilgari Cracker Barrel Presentation October 2020 · bilgari-cracker-barrel-presentation-october-2020
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
29
Uses a timeline to highlight the short duration between investment and closure, followed by a quote to expose management's narrative.Bilgari Cracker Barrel Presentation October 2020 · bilgari-cracker-barrel-presentation-october-2020
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
30
Bilgari Cracker Barrel Presentation October 2020Bilgari Cracker Barrel Presentation October 2020 · bilgari-cracker-barrel-presentation-october-2020
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
34
The slide uses a hub-and-spoke style diagram to show how multiple board members share the same corporate pedigree.Bilgari Cracker Barrel Presentation October 2020 · bilgari-cracker-barrel-presentation-october-2020
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
35
Uses visual arrows to map the professional overlap between Norman E. Johnson and James W. Bradford.Bilgari Cracker Barrel Presentation October 2020 · bilgari-cracker-barrel-presentation-october-2020
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
36
Uses a circular process diagram to illustrate the board's failure loop.Bilgari Cracker Barrel Presentation October 2020 · bilgari-cracker-barrel-presentation-october-2020
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
41
Uses a comparison table structure to contrast two business units and juxtaposes them with management commentary.Bilgari Cracker Barrel Presentation October 2020 · bilgari-cracker-barrel-presentation-october-2020
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
09
The slide uses a 'before-after' comparison of valuation multiples to illustrate the 'decoupling' thesis.Elliott Management Sampo Group Presentation November 2020 · elliott-management-sampo-group-presentation-november-2020
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · ProblemLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
06
Uses a historical stock price chart to visually demonstrate the lack of shareholder value creation.Eminence Pluralsight Presentation February 2021 · eminence-pluralsight-presentation-february-2021
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
09
Uses annotations to highlight 'Sales force execution issues' and 'COVID impact' as temporary headwinds.Eminence Pluralsight Presentation February 2021 · eminence-pluralsight-presentation-february-2021
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · AgitateLoop · Benchmark Gap1 hit
11
Uses rhetorical questions to challenge the Board's decision-making process.Eminence Pluralsight Presentation February 2021 · eminence-pluralsight-presentation-february-2021
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
12
The slide uses a series of rhetorical questions to challenge the integrity of the company's M&A process.Eminence Pluralsight Presentation February 2021 · eminence-pluralsight-presentation-february-2021
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
13
Uses a series of rhetorical questions to highlight a potential conflict of interest or manipulation of market expectations.Eminence Pluralsight Presentation February 2021 · eminence-pluralsight-presentation-february-2021
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
14
Uses rhetorical questions to highlight governance failures and conflicts of interest.Eminence Pluralsight Presentation February 2021 · eminence-pluralsight-presentation-february-2021
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
15
Uses a contrast-pairs framework to highlight management's shifting narrative.Eminence Pluralsight Presentation February 2021 · eminence-pluralsight-presentation-february-2021
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit