slides · global inventory
Expose Contradiction
Slide function collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Matching slides 14,162
Current window 12,991-13,020
Pages 473
Rows per page 30
Slide function
12,991-13,020 of 14,162
09
The slide uses a timeline to frame a narrative of corporate malfeasance and value transfer.Icahn Enterprises | Activist Presentation Deck | 20 slides · Icahn Capital
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
11
Uses a line chart with shaded area to visualize the widening valuation gap over time.Icahn Enterprises | Activist Presentation Deck | 20 slides · Icahn Capital
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
13
Uses a Statista chart to show PC market decline and a custom table to calculate the implied share price vs management's claim.Icahn Enterprises | Activist Presentation Deck | 20 slides · Icahn Capital
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
14
Uses third-party quotes to build credibility for the activist position.Icahn Enterprises | Activist Presentation Deck | 20 slides · Icahn Capital
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
05
The slide uses a dual-axis combo chart to contrast cash outflow with share price performance over time.Legion Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 14 slides · Legion Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The MonsterLoop · Aha Moment1 hit
12
The chart uses a stacked bar format to emphasize the compounding nature of executive pay over time.Legion Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 14 slides · Legion Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
22
The chart uses a custom floating bar and dot plot to show guidance ranges vs actuals.Legion Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 168 slides · Legion Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
23
The slide uses a combination of bar and dot charts to contrast cash outflow with share price, emphasizing that buybacks occurred at high price points.Legion Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 168 slides · Legion Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
24
The slide uses a table to frame past acquisitions as evidence of poor capital allocation and potential self-dealing.Legion Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 168 slides · Legion Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
27
The slide uses a list-based format to build a case for poor corporate governance and misalignment.Legion Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 168 slides · Legion Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
28
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to visualize the accumulation of executive pay over time, framing it as a wealth transfer.Legion Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 168 slides · Legion Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
29
The chart highlights a negative correlation of -0.28 and notes that the CEO only had positive relative TSR in 4 out of 15 years.Legion Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 168 slides · Legion Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
31
The slide uses a combination bar and dot plot to visualize the disconnect between executive pay and company performance.Legion Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 168 slides · Legion Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
32
The slide uses two bar charts to contrast company performance against a 'Peer Group Average' to highlight the misalignment between executive pay and shareholder value.Legion Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 168 slides · Legion Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
34
The slide uses a timeline to frame the board's history as a series of failures, culminating in a callout box that dismisses recent changes as reactive.Legion Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 168 slides · Legion Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
36
Uses specific examples of buybuy BABY and Chef Central acquisitions to illustrate governance failures.Legion Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 168 slides · Legion Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
37
Uses a table of voting results and a narrative justification to expose board entrenchment.Legion Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 168 slides · Legion Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
38
The slide uses a direct quote from an SEC filing to frame the company's internal control failures as evidence of corruption.Legion Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 168 slides · Legion Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
65
The slide uses a screenshot of a Google search results page to prove a lack of SEO/SEM presence.Legion Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 168 slides · Legion Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The MonsterLoop · Mece Breakdown1 hit
82
The chart uses an inverted Y-axis where lower numbers (closer to 1) represent higher traffic, making the downward slope a visual representation of declining performance.Legion Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 168 slides · Legion Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The MonsterLoop · Mece Breakdown1 hit
85
The slide uses a dual-chart layout to contrast high capital deployment with declining returns.Legion Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 168 slides · Legion Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
86
Uses external validation (UBS, Morgan Stanley) to frame management as unreliable.Legion Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 168 slides · Legion Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
87
Uses a 'What they're saying now' vs 'What they've said in the past' structure to expose management inconsistency.Legion Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 168 slides · Legion Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
88
Uses a side-by-side comparison frame to expose management inconsistency.Legion Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 168 slides · Legion Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
89
Uses a side-by-side comparison to undermine management credibility.Legion Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 168 slides · Legion Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
90
Uses a 'What they're saying now' vs 'What they've said in the past' structure to expose management inconsistency.Legion Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 168 slides · Legion Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
91
Uses a 'What they're saying now' vs 'What they've said in the past' structure to highlight management's failure to deliver on long-standing promises.Legion Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 168 slides · Legion Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
92
Uses historical CEO quotes to highlight the gap between management's self-perception and actual market position.Legion Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 168 slides · Legion Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
93
Uses a 'before-after' framing to expose management's repetitive narrative.Legion Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 168 slides · Legion Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
05
Uses a numbered list to structure five distinct thematic contradictions.Third Point Management | Activist Presentation Deck | 102 slides · Third Point
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem (Identify pain)1 hit