slides · global inventory
Diagnose
Slide function collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Matching slides 2,410
Current window 1,231-1,260
Pages 81
Rows per page 30
Slide function
1,231-1,260 of 2,410
32
The chart uses a waterfall-style stacked bar approach to show the composition of TOC, Expenditure, and Revenue requirement.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
35
The slide uses a categorization framework to justify a policy recommendation regarding Network Rail (NR) and Train Operating Companies (TOCs).Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
45
Part of a series of slides analyzing sharing mechanism practicalities.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
46
The slide discusses 'option value' in the context of rail franchise bidding and Value for Money (VfM).Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
48
The slide critiques the PR08 EBS mechanism as ineffective due to its national scope, which weakens the link between operator actions and financial results.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
49
The slide discusses structural changes to rail network management regions.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
54
The slide discusses the potential impact of the McNulty Rail VfM review on TOC business models.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
56
Discusses RPI-X regulation, capex/opex reclassification risks, and ORR/NR/TOC incentive alignment.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
57
L.E.K. consulting slide, page 56.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
67
The slide uses direct quotes from stakeholders to illustrate the sensitivity around information sharing.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
68
The slide highlights the misalignment between current management structures and the proposed geographic reporting requirements.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
72
The slide uses a bulleted list to detail stakeholder feedback and specific concerns regarding regional cost/revenue sharing.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
84
The slide uses a color-coded table to map categories and criteria to scores and mitigation actions.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
89
The slide discusses the asymmetry of risk in an outperformance-only incentive scheme compared to a symmetrical one.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
105
The slide discusses the implications of including TOC performance in a sharing mechanism, specifically noting risks of gaming and the need for open-book accounting.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
106
The slide uses qualitative feedback from industry stakeholders to argue against a specific policy option.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
110
The slide discusses specific issues related to Network Rail (NR) cost base, FTAC allocation methodology, and the potential for adversarial relationships between operators and infrastructure managers.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
114
The slide uses a scoring system (++, +, 0, -, --) to evaluate criteria across categories A-F.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
124
Focuses on the friction between train operators/Network Rail and regulators (DfT/ORR) regarding contractual flexibility.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
151
Includes a direct quote from a stakeholder regarding the lack of confidence in influencing the national-level mechanism.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
152
L.E.K. consulting slide, page 151.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
155
The slide uses a bulleted list format to present qualitative findings from stakeholder workshops.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
157
Part of a two-slide series on capacity and timetabling. Mentions specific industry entities: DfT, ORR, and East Coast Mainline.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
159
The slide uses quotes from stakeholders to illustrate specific pain points in the planning process.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
161
Includes direct quotes from TOC stakeholders.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
163
Includes direct quotes from stakeholders to illustrate pain points.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
14
The slide uses a central 'Opportunity identification' box fed by six distinct analytical approaches.Reshaping NYCHA support functions · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
17
The slide uses a swimlane-style process map to visualize the applicant journey and identify bottlenecks.Reshaping NYCHA support functions · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Pattern Hunter1 hit
18
The diagram uses a color-coded legend to categorize IT systems based on performance and issue status.Reshaping NYCHA support functions · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Pattern Hunter1 hit
61
The slide uses a structured table format to map risks to mitigation actions.Reshaping NYCHA support functions · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit