slides · global inventory
Expose Contradiction
Slide function collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Matching slides 14,162
Current window 91-120
Pages 473
Rows per page 30
Slide function
91-120 of 14,162
53
Uses a callout box to link the chart data to the management's shifting narrative.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
54
Uses a bar chart to visually demonstrate the gap between management rhetoric and financial reality.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
55
The slide uses a 'Damaged Credibility' framing to undermine management's forward-looking guidance.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
56
Uses a 'villain' framing by highlighting management's failure to meet financial projections.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
57
Uses a waterfall-style bridge to show the flow of capital from divestitures to acquisitions.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
58
The slide uses market performance data to argue that management failed to capitalize on a high-value asset, contrasting PSX performance with the strong performance of midstream peers.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
59
Uses a before-after framing to contrast management's initial promises with current reality.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
61
The slide uses direct quotes to build a narrative of management failure and loss of investor confidence.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
62
The slide uses a 'before-after' framing to highlight the impact of Elliott's engagement on investor interest.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
64
Uses a contrast-pairs framework to systematically debunk management claims.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
65
Uses a series of five identical text blocks from proxy statements to show the Board's repetitive, non-responsive stance over nearly a decade.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
66
Uses two pull-quotes from academic experts to frame the board's actions as a distraction tactic.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
67
Uses a combination of bar charts and a callout quote to highlight the misalignment between performance and pay.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
75
Uses a 'Company Claim' vs 'Reality' framework to systematically dismantle management's arguments.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
93
Uses a classic 'Claim vs Reality' structure to systematically dismantle management's narrative.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
94
The slide uses a 'Claim vs Reality' structure to frame the narrative.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
95
The slide uses a direct quote from the CEO to set up a contradiction with the activist's analysis of the company's methodology.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
96
Uses a 'ripped paper' visual effect to contrast two different data sources.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
97
Uses a line chart to show performance during COO tenure and a bar chart to show relative underperformance across multiple time horizons.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
99
The table contrasts 'Company's Flawed Methodology' with 'Correct Methodology' across various timeframes.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
101
The slide highlights a specific technical manipulation in peer group benchmarking.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
102
Uses CEO quotes to establish the 'claim' and a bar chart to establish the 'reality'.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
103
Uses a CEO quote as the 'Claim' and a bar chart as the 'Reality' to expose a contradiction.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
104
The slide uses a dual-axis chart to overlay commodity prices on company opex to demonstrate that management is taking credit for market-driven cost reductions.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
105
Uses a 'Claim vs Reality' framework to systematically dismantle corporate messaging.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
106
Uses a three-column structure to address specific business segments: Midstream/Refining, Chemicals/Midstream, and Refining/M&S.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
107
Uses a 'Claim vs Reality' framing to directly refute a management assertion.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
108
Uses a contrast-pair framework to dismantle the company's argument.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
109
Uses a 'Claim vs Reality' framing to directly refute a company statement.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
110
Uses a dual-chart comparison to show that while gross margin improves with allocation, the opex gap widens, contradicting the company's narrative.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit