anlak storytelling
All kinds
Document kinds
Loading document kinds...

Primary corpus lens for browsing and insights. Selection lives in the URL.

All formats
Orientation
Loading formats...

Landscape, portrait, square, or unknown document geometry.

Unlock
slides · global inventory

Compare Peers

Slide function collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.

Search Insights JSON Unlock
Matching slides 9,820
Current window 9,421-9,450
Pages 328
Rows per page 30
Slide function: Compare Peersclear collectionreset all
18 30 60

Slide function

9,421-9,450 of 9,820

filter-aware
28
Includes data for Hero Consensus, Hero Management, and specific retail peer groups (Specialty Retail, Home Stores, Department/Mass, eCommerce).5 IBD presentation 2017 HSN Inc. Centerview Partners · 5-ibd-presentation-2017-hsn-inc-centerview-partners
Deck Investment bank 1 hit
29
Data sourced from Factset as of January 27, 2017.5 IBD presentation 2017 HSN Inc. Centerview Partners · 5-ibd-presentation-2017-hsn-inc-centerview-partners
Deck Investment bank 1 hit
28
Includes two distinct charts: a state-level bar chart and a district-level comparison point.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
38
The chart highlights a 10% growth in Boston's ELL population, representing a raw increase of 7,656 students.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
43
The slide highlights a persistent performance gap between BPS and the state, with a slight narrowing trend by 10th grade.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
55
The chart highlights Boston (BPS) in a darker blue color compared to the other peer cities.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
70
The slide uses two bar charts to contrast operational efficiency (cost per meal) with revenue performance (costs as % of revenue).5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
74
The chart uses a grouped bar format to show year-over-year change for multiple cities.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
76
The slide uses horizontal bar charts to compare Boston (orange) against other districts (blue).5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
78
The slide uses a line chart to show performance improvement and a horizontal bar chart to show cost benchmarking.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
79
The chart uses bubble size to represent transportation spending per student, with Boston (BPS) shown as a large dark blue bubble.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
81
The chart highlights a 21% variance for BPS compared to peers.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Loop · Pattern Hunter1 hit
119
The slide uses a peer benchmark to argue for potential cost savings through operational efficiency.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
122
The slide uses peer benchmarking to establish credibility for financial projections.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
135
Includes two bar charts: one for state-level data and one for district-level data (Boston vs MA average).5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
160
5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
170
The slide uses two horizontal bar charts to compare performance metrics across districts, with 'Boston' highlighted in yellow.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
173
The slide uses a horizontal bar chart for peer benchmarking and a grouped bar chart for site-specific participation.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
219
The slide uses a funnel diagram to illustrate the filtering process based on enrollment, location, socioeconomic status, and school size.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
17
The slide uses a dual-chart layout: a top line chart for absolute stock price with event annotations, and a bottom line chart for indexed relative performance against peer groups.61 IBD presentation 2020 Stein Mart Inc PJ Solomon 1 · 61-ibd-presentation-2020-stein-mart-inc-pj-solomon-1
Deck Investment bank Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
18
The slide uses a grouped bar chart format to contrast performance metrics across two distinct retail segments.61 IBD presentation 2020 Stein Mart Inc PJ Solomon 1 · 61-ibd-presentation-2020-stein-mart-inc-pj-solomon-1
Deck Investment bank Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
19
The chart uses a horizontal axis with bars representing stock performance percentages for various companies, grouped by sector.61 IBD presentation 2020 Stein Mart Inc PJ Solomon 1 · 61-ibd-presentation-2020-stein-mart-inc-pj-solomon-1
Deck Investment bank Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
30
Includes median calculations for multiples and specific footnotes regarding IFRS 16 and non-material trading data.61 IBD presentation 2020 Stein Mart Inc PJ Solomon 1 · 61-ibd-presentation-2020-stein-mart-inc-pj-solomon-1
Deck Investment bank Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Hypothesis Test1 hit
17
The slide contains two distinct tables summarizing financial metrics for five companies, including mean and median calculations.62 IBD presentation 2019 Antero Midstream Partners LP PJ Solomon 1 · 62-ibd-presentation-2019-antero-midstream-partners-lp-pj-solomon-1
Deck Investment bank Beat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
11
Includes detailed footnotes regarding specific company transactions and methodology for implied price calculations.64 IBD presentation 2019 Antero Midstream Partners LP Tudor Pickering Holt 1 · 64-ibd-presentation-2019-antero-midstream-partners-lp-tudor-pickering-holt-1
Deck Investment bank Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Pattern Hunter1 hit
20
Includes detailed footnotes explaining calculation methodologies for GP value, enterprise value, and specific transaction contexts.64 IBD presentation 2019 Antero Midstream Partners LP Tudor Pickering Holt 1 · 64-ibd-presentation-2019-antero-midstream-partners-lp-tudor-pickering-holt-1
Deck Investment bank Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
41
Includes valuation multiples (Equity Value/DCF, Enterprise Value/EBITDA) and yield/growth metrics.64 IBD presentation 2019 Antero Midstream Partners LP Tudor Pickering Holt 1 · 64-ibd-presentation-2019-antero-midstream-partners-lp-tudor-pickering-holt-1
Deck Investment bank Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
70
Includes a table of comparable public companies and two distinct cost of equity calculation frameworks.64 IBD presentation 2019 Antero Midstream Partners LP Tudor Pickering Holt 1 · 64-ibd-presentation-2019-antero-midstream-partners-lp-tudor-pickering-holt-1
Deck Investment bank Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
71
Includes both yield-based implied total return and CAPM-based cost of equity calculations.64 IBD presentation 2019 Antero Midstream Partners LP Tudor Pickering Holt 1 · 64-ibd-presentation-2019-antero-midstream-partners-lp-tudor-pickering-holt-1
Deck Investment bank Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
72
The table calculates implied total return based on weighted growth estimates.64 IBD presentation 2019 Antero Midstream Partners LP Tudor Pickering Holt 1 · 64-ibd-presentation-2019-antero-midstream-partners-lp-tudor-pickering-holt-1
Deck Investment bank Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit