slides · global inventory
Compare Peers
Slide function collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Matching slides 9,820
Current window 7,321-7,350
Pages 328
Rows per page 30
Slide function
7,321-7,350 of 9,820
39
The chart uses a grouped bar chart to illustrate the economic structure across five categories: Research Funding/Cost, Upfront Payment, Clinical Milestones, Commercial Milestones, and Royalties.Absci | Investor Presentation Deck | 42 slides · Absci
Pitch deck Investor relations 1 hit
09
The slide highlights the superior NPV of IL-6 compared to standard biomarkers using a table and an ROC curve.Bluejay | Investor Presentation Deck | 20 slides · Bluejay Diagnostics
Pitch deck Investor relations Beat · SolutionLoop · Golden Circle1 hit
14
The table compares 7 distinct operational metrics between the Bluejay Symphony and competitors (Beckman, Siemens, Roche).Bluejay | Investor Presentation Deck | 20 slides · Bluejay Diagnostics
Pitch deck Investor relations 1 hit
12
The table uses green checkmarks for Comera and grey checkmarks for competitors, highlighting Comera's unique combination of all three advantages.Comera | Investor Presentation Deck | 16 slides · Comera
Pitch deck Investor relations Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Golden Circle1 hit
21
The slide uses a split-panel layout to contrast current capabilities with future advancements.D-Wave | Investor Presentation Deck | 28 slides · D-Wave
Pitch deck Investor relations Beat · ActionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
07
The slide uses a table to contrast financial metrics and production strategies, positioning Eos as more efficient than competitors.Eos Energy | Investor Presentation Deck | 24 slides · Eos Energy Enterprises
Pitch deck Investor relations Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
09
The slide uses a maturity model approach to show product evolution.Eos Energy | Investor Presentation Deck | 24 slides · Eos Energy Enterprises
Pitch deck Investor relations Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
12
The slide uses a before-and-after comparison framework to justify the technological advancement of the Eos Z3 battery.Eos Energy | Investor Presentation Deck | 24 slides · Eos Energy Enterprises
Pitch deck Investor relations Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Quick Win Big Bet1 hit
18
The slide uses a custom table structure to show how specific technical advantages (RTE, Auxiliary Power, etc.) contribute to a total IRR delta.Eos Energy | Investor Presentation Deck | 24 slides · Eos Energy Enterprises
Pitch deck Investor relations Beat · SatisfactionLoop · Voice Of Customer1 hit
21
The slide uses stacked bar charts to detail expense categories and a table for peer benchmarking.Eos Energy | Investor Presentation Deck | 24 slides · Eos Energy Enterprises
Pitch deck Investor relations Beat · Action1 hit
24
The slide compares two different drugs (baricitinib and deuruxolitinib) using their respective clinical trial data (BRAVE AA1 and THRIVE AA1).Equillium | Investor Presentation Deck | 32 slides · Equillium
Pitch deck Investor relations 1 hit
10
The matrix uses a qualitative 2x2 structure to illustrate market positioning.FGI Industries | Investor Presentation Deck | 30 slides · FGI Industries
Pitch deck Investor relations Beat · Market Size1 hit
08
Uses a pyramid diagram to represent the progression of clinical validation.Genelux | Investor Presentation Deck | 37 slides · Genelux
Pitch deck Investor relations 1 hit
11
The slide uses a combination of bar charts for preclinical cytokine release and a table for clinical outcomes to demonstrate the superiority of the NXC-201 CD8 hinge optimization.Immix Biopharma | Investor Presentation Deck | 62 slides · ImmixBio
Pitch deck Investor relations Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
14
The slide explicitly notes that these are not head-to-head results and caution should be exercised in comparison.Immix Biopharma | Investor Presentation Deck | 62 slides · ImmixBio
Pitch deck Investor relations Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
17
The slide uses a visual timeline comparison to highlight the clinical advantage of NXC-201's shorter side-effect profile.Immix Biopharma | Investor Presentation Deck | 62 slides · ImmixBio
Pitch deck Investor relations Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
21
The slide uses a bar chart to compare hematologic and cardiac response rates across different therapies.Immix Biopharma | Investor Presentation Deck | 62 slides · ImmixBio
Pitch deck Investor relations Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
22
The slide uses a table structure to contrast patient segments and includes a bar chart visualization for patient growth.Immix Biopharma | Investor Presentation Deck | 62 slides · ImmixBio
Pitch deck Investor relations Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
22
The chart highlights tech companies in blue and non-tech companies in grey.SoftBank | Investor Presentation Deck | 103 slides · SoftBank
Pitch deck Investor relations Beat · HowLoop · Why Now1 hit
34
The slide highlights OYO's rapid growth compared to established incumbents.SoftBank | Investor Presentation Deck | 103 slides · SoftBank
Pitch deck Investor relations Beat · How1 hit
89
Uses a before-after-framing approach to contrast traditional methods with the company's solution.SoftBank | Investor Presentation Deck | 103 slides · SoftBank
Pitch deck Investor relations Beat · DesireLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
90
The slide uses a comparison table to demonstrate the rapid growth of AI-related metrics over a six-year period.SoftBank | Results Presentation Deck | 100 slides · SoftBank
Conference presentation Investor relations Beat · VisualizationLoop · Golden Circle1 hit
22
The slide uses a comparison table to demonstrate the rapid growth of AI-related metrics over a six-year period.SoftBank | Results Presentation Deck | 32 slides · SoftBank
Conference presentation Investor relations Beat · DevelopmentLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
44
The slide uses a comparison frame to distinguish between two investment vehicles within the same organization.SoftBank | Results Presentation Deck | 72 slides · SoftBank
Conference presentation Investor relations Beat · Action1 hit
16
Includes a callout box explaining the path back to growth.Sonder | Investor Presentation Deck | 27 slides · Sonder
Pitch deck Investor relations Beat · Financials1 hit
18
The chart uses a baseline to show negative growth for several major hotel chains.Sonder | Investor Presentation Deck | 27 slides · Sonder
Pitch deck Investor relations Beat · Financials1 hit
05
The matrix uses a qualitative positioning strategy to differentiate Sonos from 'Big Tech' and 'Legacy' players.Sonos | Investor Presentation Deck | 21 slides · Sonos
Pitch deck Investor relations Beat · Rising Success1 hit
21
The chart uses a 2x2 matrix structure (Premium/Commodity vs Walled Garden/Open Platform).Sonos | Results Presentation Deck | 40 slides · Sonos
Conference presentation Investor relations Beat · Future VisionLoop · Quick Win Big Bet1 hit
23
The slide highlights market leadership through brand rankings and specific product performance.Sonos | Results Presentation Deck | 40 slides · Sonos
Conference presentation Investor relations Beat · Future VisionLoop · Quick Win Big Bet1 hit
08
The slide uses a checkmark matrix to validate the strategic rationale for two specific M&A deals.Vivid Seats | Results Presentation Deck | 22 slides · Vivid Seats
Conference presentation Investor relations Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit