Matching slides 9,820
Current window 4,861-4,890
Pages 328
Rows per page 30
Slide function: Compare Peersclear collectionreset all

Slide function

4,861-4,890 of 9,820

filter-aware
13
Data based on LTM ended June 30, 2016. Cinemark data is US only.AMC | Investor Presentation Deck | 19 slides · AMC
Pitch deck Investor relations Beat · Ultimate Achievement1 hit
10
The table highlights the % Premium column with a yellow background box.AMC | Mergers and Acquisitions Presentation Deck | 16 slides · AMC
Deck Investment bank Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
11
The slide justifies the exclusion of international comps due to differing operating environments and accounting standards.AMC | Mergers and Acquisitions Presentation Deck | 16 slides · AMC
Deck Investment bank Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
12
Data is LTM March 2016.AMC | Mergers and Acquisitions Presentation Deck | 16 slides · AMC
Deck Investment bank Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
13
The slide uses two bar charts to show downward revisions in revenue and EBITDA projections, alongside a list of reasons for Carmike's valuation discount.AMC | Mergers and Acquisitions Presentation Deck | 16 slides · AMC
Deck Investment bank Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
11
The table segments companies into Manufacturing and Downstream, providing medians for each and a total median.Citi | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 16 slides · Citi
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Mece Breakdown1 hit
16
Includes median and average benchmarks for both metrics.Citi | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 16 slides · Citi
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
05
Includes both aggregate 2010-2016 data and 2016 YTD data, plus a multi-year ranking table.Goldman Sachs | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 33 slides · Goldman Sachs
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
10
The slide uses a comparison framework to justify a corporate transaction.Hewlett Packard Enterprise | Mergers and Acquisitions Presentation Deck | 21 slides · Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Deck Investment bank Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
17
The chart shows a significant underperformance of both Synutra and the selected peer group index compared to the S&P 500 over the 3-year period.Houlihan Lokey | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 40 slides · Houlihan Lokey
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
22
The slide includes a disclaimer about the preliminary nature of the draft and notes that footnotes are on the next page.Houlihan Lokey | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 40 slides · Houlihan Lokey
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
24
The chart highlights periods where Synutra's EBITDA was negative or non-meaningful.Houlihan Lokey | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 40 slides · Houlihan Lokey
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Analogy1 hit
30
The slide presents six tables comparing various dairy companies across different financial dimensions.Houlihan Lokey | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 40 slides · Houlihan Lokey
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Analogy1 hit
31
Includes disclaimer regarding data sources and definitions for NMF, NA, and LTM.Houlihan Lokey | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 40 slides · Houlihan Lokey
Consulting deck Investment bank Loop · Analogy1 hit
14
The chart shows a decline in multiples for both entities over the 3-year period, with Napa initially trading at a premium before converging with the peer group.Moelis & Company | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 44 slides · Moelis & Company
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
25
The table compares Napa's financial metrics and valuation multiples against a peer group of 7 public SaaS companies as of July 22, 2016.Moelis & Company | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 44 slides · Moelis & Company
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Quick Win Big Bet1 hit
03
The table includes enterprise value, revenue, growth rates, margins, and valuation multiples (EV/Revenue, EV/EBITDA).Moelis & Company | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 8 slides · Moelis & Company
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Market Size1 hit
06
The chart shows indexed performance starting at 100% on 6/7/13.Moelis & Company | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 8 slides · Moelis & Company
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · FinancialsLoop · Benchmark Gap1 hit
07
The chart shows a decline in multiples for both Napa and the peer group over the 3-year period ending June 2016.Moelis & Company | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 8 slides · Moelis & Company
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · FinancialsLoop · Benchmark Gap1 hit
03
The table includes enterprise value, revenue, growth rates, margins, and valuation multiples (EV/Revenue, EV/EBITDA).Moelis & Company | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 9 slides · Moelis & Company
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Market SizeLoop · Benchmark Gap1 hit
07
The chart shows relative performance indexed to 100% at the start date of 6/13/13.Moelis & Company | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 9 slides · Moelis & Company
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Competition1 hit
08
The chart shows a clear trend of Napa's valuation multiple compressing relative to the peer group over the 3-year period.Moelis & Company | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 9 slides · Moelis & Company
Consulting deck Investment bank 1 hit
11
The slide title 'Solar' appears to be a typo in the original deck, as the companies listed are media/entertainment firms.PJT Partners | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 53 slides · PJT Partners
Consulting deck Investment bank Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
50
The slide presents a comparative analysis of financial forecasts from various investment banks for HBO and Showtime, with median values calculated for each.PJT Partners | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 53 slides · PJT Partners
Consulting deck Investment bank 1 hit
07
The slide uses a clean, high-contrast table format to highlight the differences between the two planets.SpaceX | Investor Event Presentation Deck | 61 slides · spacex
Pitch deck Investor relations 1 hit
16
Likely part of a comparison slide comparing aerospace vehicles (e.g., rockets vs planes).SpaceX | Investor Event Presentation Deck | 61 slides · spacex
Pitch deck Investor relations 1 hit
22
The slide uses a color-coded legend to indicate performance levels (Good, OK, Bad, Very Bad) for Kerosene, Hydrogen/Oxygen, and Deep-Cryo Methalox.SpaceX | Investor Event Presentation Deck | 61 slides · spacex
Pitch deck Investor relations 1 hit
27
The chart uses visual scale to represent performance, culminating in a 'Mars Vehicle' which is significantly larger than historical rockets like the Saturn V.SpaceX | Investor Event Presentation Deck | 61 slides · spacex
Pitch deck Investor relations 1 hit
28
The chart uses a visual height comparison to represent payload capacity, with the Mars Vehicle significantly outperforming existing heavy-lift rockets.SpaceX | Investor Event Presentation Deck | 61 slides · spacex
Pitch deck Investor relations 1 hit
29
The slide uses a visual scale comparison (rocket silhouettes) to provide context for the data table.SpaceX | Investor Event Presentation Deck | 61 slides · spacex
Pitch deck Investor relations 1 hit