Matching slides 58,039
Current window 4,621-4,650
Pages 1,935
Rows per page 30
Slide function: Analyze Dataclear collectionreset all

Slide function

4,621-4,650 of 58,039

filter-aware
13
The chart uses a Marimekko layout to show volume distribution across segments, with color-coded arrows indicating growth/decline outlooks.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
17
The chart uses a regression line with an R-squared value of 0.57 to illustrate the relationship.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
19
The slide uses a dark green background typical of BCG decks. It includes a specific callout for the -44% change in First-Class Mail revenue.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Why Now1 hit
36
Uses Harvey balls to represent qualitative scores for improvement drivers.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
41
BCG logo present. Internet survey, n=1736.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
33
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to visualize the composition of TOC revenue and a list to justify inclusion/exclusion criteria.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
34
The table evaluates four scenarios: No sharing, Full sharing, TOC pax and sch 8 revenue shared only, and TOC pax revenue shared only.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
36
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to visualize the total cost base and a list to justify inclusion/exclusion decisions for specific cost categories.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
38
Includes a quote from a stakeholder regarding the risk of gaming the system.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
40
The table includes adjustments for non-PR08 funded enhancements and deferred expenditure.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
41
Source: NR, Delivery Plan Update, March 2010. Note: * Including CIRAS fee.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
50
The chart uses bubble size to represent total train kms. A vertical line at 70% highlights the threshold mentioned in the title.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
51
The slide argues that the underlying data requirements and mapping challenges remain largely the same regardless of the chosen geographic entity.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
61
The slide presents two side-by-side tables comparing TOC and Network Rail financial data for CP4.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
62
Contains two data tables showing profit impact in £m and PPT.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
76
The table provides a clear mapping of contractual vs. assumed timelines for rail franchises, highlighting specific regulatory or operational reasons for deviations.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
90
The slide details how L.E.K. applied Oxera's findings on cost expenditure standard deviations to estimate EBS payment impacts.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
91
The slide uses a normal distribution curve to quantify financial risk/volatility.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
93
The slide explains the statistical basis for cost volatility aggregation using standard deviation and covariance formulas.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
94
The slide compares two scenarios based on regional vs national level mechanisms. The data shows how volatility and correlation affect financial outcomes.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
143
The slide uses a flow diagram to illustrate how expenditure categories feed into the Regulatory Asset Base (RAB) and subsequently into the revenue requirement calculation.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
144
The table provides a financial breakdown of the allowed return components for CP4.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
145
The slide outlines the structure of the Management Incentive Plan (MIP) for various executive roles, including performance measures and bonus potential.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
112
The table uses a color-coded heatmap (red, orange, yellow, green) to represent quartiles of performance across different departments and survey dimensions.Reshaping NYCHA support functions · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
03
The chart uses a radar/spider plot to visualize multi-dimensional performance metrics.Retail Banking Evolution in the Age of AI · Kearney
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
06
Retail Banking Evolution in the Age of AIRetail Banking Evolution in the Age of AI · Kearney
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
22
Includes a breakdown of court expenditures by category (Employee, Property, Operations, Security, Travel, Other).Review of efficiency of the operation of the federal courts · PwC
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
24
Includes both a summary table of roles and a stacked bar chart for FTE distribution.Review of efficiency of the operation of the federal courts · PwC
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
25
The slide highlights the concentration of court staff in major states like NSW, QLD, and VIC.Review of efficiency of the operation of the federal courts · PwC
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
27
The chart uses a waterfall structure to decompose the total caseload into specific court and case types.Review of efficiency of the operation of the federal courts · PwC
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit