slides · global inventory
35 Scenario Fork
Loop collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Matching slides 220
Current window 1-60
Pages 4
Rows per page 60
Loop
1-60 of 220
18
The slide outlines a methodology for scaling military capacities and lists the 15 specific capacities analyzed across four branches (Flyvevåbnet, Hæren, Søværnet, SO-KOM).Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
19
The slide serves as a disclaimer/limitation for the scaling model presented in the deck.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
20
The table includes a footnote regarding Hærens kapaciteter (Army capabilities) and their cost variations.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
21
The slide is part of a BCG presentation for Struensee & Co. It uses a table to compare 7 scenarios across different military units.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
164
Includes a footnote regarding Army capabilities and cost variations based on deployment duration.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
165
The table includes a legend for 'Basis for 2017' and detailed footnotes explaining the methodology and specific scenario constraints.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
166
The slide uses a scenario-based comparison framework to evaluate operational scaling options.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
167
The slide compares SAR (Search and Rescue) and TTT (Tactical Troop Transport) capabilities across five scenarios.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
168
The slide illustrates the 'lag' between cost reduction and cash/expenditure impact.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
169
The slide uses a scenario-based comparison framework to evaluate readiness levels (7, 30, 180, 360 days) against cost and operational constraints.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
170
The slide compares readiness scenarios (1-4) based on notice periods (7, 30, 180, 360 days) and their associated cost and operational impacts.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
171
The slide uses a table to compare four distinct operational scenarios for the Absalon-class ships, focusing on deployment days, crew requirements, and costs.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
172
The slide compares four scenarios for Challenger aircraft operations, focusing on VIP transport, general transport, NATO/INTOPS tasks, and Arctic presence.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
173
The slide compares operational scenarios based on mission days (farvandsovervågning) and associated costs.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
174
The slide compares five scenarios for FENNEC helicopter operations, likely for the Danish military/police. It includes a BCG logo.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
175
The slide compares four readiness scenarios (1-4) based on deployment notice periods (7, 30, 180, 360 days) and their associated cost and operational impacts.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
176
The table compares 6 scenarios based on operational days, crew size, and hull count, with associated financial and temporal implications.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
177
The slide compares three scenarios for vessel deployment, showing trade-offs between operational days, crew/hull requirements, and costs.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
178
The slide compares four scenarios (1-4) based on readiness time (7, 30, 180, 360 days) and their impact on training, logistics, and costs.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
179
The slide compares five scenarios for Hercules aircraft usage, ranging from reduced activity to full operational capacity, including cost drivers like flight hours, crew, and aircraft count.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
180
The slide contains a large redacted area covering the content of the scenario comparison table.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
181
The slide is redacted; the table structure is visible but the content is blacked out. Includes a disclaimer note at the bottom.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
182
The slide uses a three-column structure to diagnose data limitations in military scaling analysis.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
183
The table compares scenarios 1-7 against a 'current scenario' baseline (Scenario 4).Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
84
The slide uses a structured table format to present a business case for IT insourcing.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
85
The slide uses a three-column structure (A, B, C) to represent a process or logical flow of the proposal development.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
86
The slide contrasts 2016 findings with current recruitment challenges and updated cost assumptions.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
87
The slide uses a table to map task types to headcount, then groups them into two distinct scenarios for outsourcing strategy.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
88
The waterfall chart shows the deduction of licenses and hardware costs and the addition of development consultant costs to reach the net addressable baseline.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
89
Waterfall chart shows the breakdown of costs from total DeMars budget to addressable drift savings.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
90
Includes a waterfall chart for cost baseline and a scenario comparison table for recruitment, cost, and revenue.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
91
The slide acts as a transition/summary page between detailed scenario analysis slides.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
92
Includes a risk callout for SAP consultant turnover and financial benefit estimation.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
93
The slide uses a comparison table to highlight Scenario B, with a callout box explaining the rationale and a footer note addressing the primary risk.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
94
The slide compares three levels of insourcing (1-9, 10-18, 19-27 FTEs) with a recommendation for the middle option.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
95
The slide details the methodology behind a 10-25% savings potential, referencing previous PA Consulting reports and Deloitte sensitivity analysis.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
96
The slide outlines the financial impact of bringing SAP competencies in-house, including recruitment costs and potential savings.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
97
The slide uses a Gantt-style chart to map activities against time and financial impact.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
322
The slide outlines the baseline, potential savings, implementation description, risks, prerequisites, and overlaps for an administrative consolidation project.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
323
The slide uses a structured table-like layout to present methodology and findings for a public sector efficiency project.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 Materialesamling Del 2 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
17
The map uses isometric icons to represent sector-specific decarbonization measures.Climate Change: BCG’s Perspectives and Offerings · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
18
The slide uses an isometric map of Germany as a central visual anchor to map sector-specific decarbonization strategies.Climate Change: BCG’s Perspectives and Offerings · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
19
The chart uses a waterfall structure to illustrate the reduction of CO2e emissions through specific technological interventions.Climate Change: BCG’s Perspectives and Offerings · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
10
Conquering the next value frontier in private equityConquering the next value frontier in private equity · Accenture
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
11
The slide is split into two distinct sections: a left side discussing market trends in PE and a right side detailing a specific client engagement.Conquering the next value frontier in private equity · Accenture
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
13
The 'Weakflation' scenario is highlighted as the 'Most likely' base case.January Macro Brief Special edition: 2024 outlook and top 10 macro trends · Accenture
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · The Facts (What)Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
14
The slide uses a table structure to compare scenarios across three dimensions: Description, Key scenario drivers and assumptions, and Corporate implications.January Macro Brief Special edition: 2024 outlook and top 10 macro trends · Accenture
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · The Facts (What)Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
15
The 'Sluggish recovery' scenario is highlighted as the 'Most likely' outcome.January Macro Brief Special edition: 2024 outlook and top 10 macro trends · Accenture
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · The Facts (What)Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
16
The 'Deceleration to new normal' scenario is highlighted as the 'Most likely' base case.January Macro Brief Special edition: 2024 outlook and top 10 macro trends · Accenture
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · The Facts (What)Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
17
January Macro Brief Special edition: 2024 outlook and top 10 macro trendsJanuary Macro Brief Special edition: 2024 outlook and top 10 macro trends · Accenture
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · The Facts (What)Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
10
The slide uses a matrix structure to compare three distinct policy models (Basic, Enhanced, Enhanced with employee commitment).Port of LA Clean Truck Program · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
11
Port of LA Clean Truck ProgramPort of LA Clean Truck Program · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
12
Port of LA Clean Truck ProgramPort of LA Clean Truck Program · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
12
The slide uses a Venn diagram to show the convergence of two AI domains.The CEO’s Roadmap on Generative AI · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
13
The slide uses a decision tree structure to categorize strategic paths for LLM implementation.The CEO’s Roadmap on Generative AI · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
14
The slide uses a 3-column comparison structure to contrast different levels of LLM investment.The CEO’s Roadmap on Generative AI · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
15
Includes a footnote referencing Sequoia Capital. The chart is an illustrative adoption curve.The CEO’s Roadmap on Generative AI · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
19
The slide uses a dark green background typical of BCG decks. It includes a specific callout for the -44% change in First-Class Mail revenue.US Mail Volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
20
The matrix uses a 3x3 grid to show volume outcomes. Callouts provide context for the extreme scenarios (top-right and bottom-left).US Mail Volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit
21
Uses a simple binary classification (positive/negative) for various risk/opportunity factors.US Mail Volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Scenario Fork1 hit