slides · global inventory
27 Cost Of Inaction
Loop collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Matching slides 31,900
Current window 13,741-13,770
Pages 1,064
Rows per page 30
Loop
13,741-13,770 of 31,900
23
The map uses color-coded regions to visualize store density relative to population.Pershing Square | Activist Presentation Deck | 43 slides · Pershing Square
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
24
Pershing Square | Activist Presentation Deck | 43 slidesPershing Square | Activist Presentation Deck | 43 slides · Pershing Square
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
25
The chart uses a stacked bar approach to show the composition of international units, with China growing at a 31% CAGR compared to 10% for the rest of the world.Pershing Square | Activist Presentation Deck | 43 slides · Pershing Square
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
26
The slide uses a bar chart to illustrate the growth trajectory of Starbucks in China, emphasizing the long-term potential.Pershing Square | Activist Presentation Deck | 43 slides · Pershing Square
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
27
Pershing Square | Activist Presentation Deck | 43 slidesPershing Square | Activist Presentation Deck | 43 slides · Pershing Square
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
28
Pershing Square | Activist Presentation Deck | 43 slidesPershing Square | Activist Presentation Deck | 43 slides · Pershing Square
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
29
The chart includes a specific callout regarding a loyalty program change in Q3'16 affecting transaction/ticket metrics.Pershing Square | Activist Presentation Deck | 43 slides · Pershing Square
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
30
The table uses red dashed boxes to highlight the specific product categories (Core Beverage and Frappuccino) that are driving the sales deceleration.Pershing Square | Activist Presentation Deck | 43 slides · Pershing Square
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
31
The slide highlights the gap between previous and revised financial guidance.Pershing Square | Activist Presentation Deck | 43 slides · Pershing Square
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
32
The slide uses a list format to diagnose operational and market-driven headwinds.Pershing Square | Activist Presentation Deck | 43 slides · Pershing Square
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
33
SSS stands for Same-Store Sales.Pershing Square | Activist Presentation Deck | 43 slides · Pershing Square
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
34
Pershing Square | Activist Presentation Deck | 43 slidesPershing Square | Activist Presentation Deck | 43 slides · Pershing Square
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
11
Uses an Andy Warhol-style illustration of a man with a Campbell's soup can to evoke brand decline.Third Point Management | Activist Presentation Deck | 45 slides · Third Point
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster (incumbent Board)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
12
The slide uses a classic 'blame' structure common in activist investor presentations to justify board replacement.Third Point Management | Activist Presentation Deck | 45 slides · Third Point
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster (incumbent Board)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
13
Uses the 'ceo-quote-contradiction' framework to highlight management's own admission of failure.Third Point Management | Activist Presentation Deck | 45 slides · Third Point
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster (incumbent Board)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
14
The slide uses a timeline to visualize a series of acquisitions, framing them as a 'hodgepodge' to support an activist critique of the board's governance.Third Point Management | Activist Presentation Deck | 45 slides · Third Point
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster (incumbent Board)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
15
Uses a quote from Piper Jaffray to reinforce the 'abysmal execution' narrative.Third Point Management | Activist Presentation Deck | 45 slides · Third Point
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster (incumbent Board)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
16
Uses a side-by-side comparison of two failed acquisitions to critique corporate strategy.Third Point Management | Activist Presentation Deck | 45 slides · Third Point
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster (incumbent Board)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
17
Uses media headlines to frame the investment as a failure.Third Point Management | Activist Presentation Deck | 45 slides · Third Point
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster (incumbent Board)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
18
Part of an activist investor presentation (Third Point) criticizing management.Third Point Management | Activist Presentation Deck | 45 slides · Third Point
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster (incumbent Board)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
19
The slide uses a 'problem-evidence' split layout, combining qualitative management admission with quantitative performance data.Third Point Management | Activist Presentation Deck | 45 slides · Third Point
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster (incumbent Board)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
20
The slide uses a 'problem-evidence' structure to validate the activist's critique of management.Third Point Management | Activist Presentation Deck | 45 slides · Third Point
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster (incumbent Board)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
21
Uses a third-party quote from UBS to validate the activist's critique.Third Point Management | Activist Presentation Deck | 45 slides · Third Point
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster (incumbent Board)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
22
The slide uses a combination of qualitative text and a quantitative bar chart to demonstrate the deterioration of the deal's performance.Third Point Management | Activist Presentation Deck | 45 slides · Third Point
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster (incumbent Board)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
23
Uses a before-after framing style to contrast current disaster with future outlook.Third Point Management | Activist Presentation Deck | 45 slides · Third Point
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster (incumbent Board)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
24
Uses a kitchen fire illustration to metaphorically represent the 'negative impact' and 'headwinds' mentioned in the text.Third Point Management | Activist Presentation Deck | 45 slides · Third Point
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster (incumbent Board)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
10
Uses a CEO quote to highlight the gap between management's stated goals and actual performance.Trian Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 42 slides · Trian Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
11
Uses a comparison of consensus vs revised guidance to demonstrate a pattern of poor performance.Trian Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 42 slides · Trian Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
12
The table demonstrates the gap between original reported EPS and restated EPS, showing how 'beats' turned into 'misses' after accounting corrections.Trian Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 42 slides · Trian Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
13
Uses a third-party analyst quote to validate the activist's critique of management.Trian Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 42 slides · Trian Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit