slides · global inventory
27 Cost Of Inaction
Loop collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Matching slides 31,900
Current window 31,411-31,440
Pages 1,064
Rows per page 30
Loop
31,411-31,440 of 31,900
04
Lifted Pitch DeckLifted Pitch Deck · lifted-pitch-deck
Pitch deck Investor relations Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
05
LJV FinalNov redacted flat smallLJV FinalNov redacted flat small · ljv-finalnov-redacted-flat-small
Deck Investor relations Beat · TeamLoop · Golden Circle1 hit
06
LJV FinalNov redacted flat smallLJV FinalNov redacted flat small · ljv-finalnov-redacted-flat-small
Deck Investor relations Beat · ProblemLoop · Golden Circle1 hit
07
The slide uses a timeline-based process flow to show investment stages and value-add activities.LJV FinalNov redacted flat small · ljv-finalnov-redacted-flat-small
Deck Investor relations Beat · ProblemLoop · Golden Circle1 hit
02
Lunchbox Pitch DeckLunchbox Pitch Deck · lunchbox-pitch-deck
Pitch deck Investor relations Beat · ProblemLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
03
Uses a before-after-bridge framing to contrast complexity and cost.Lunchbox Pitch Deck · lunchbox-pitch-deck
Pitch deck Investor relations Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
04
The slide uses a connected node-link diagram to represent the product ecosystem.Lunchbox Pitch Deck · lunchbox-pitch-deck
Pitch deck Investor relations Beat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
03
The slide uses a combination of a combo chart (bar/line) for historical performance and a grouped bar chart for peer comparison.Macellum Big Lots Letter March 2020 · macellum-big-lots-letter-march-2020
Document Independent analyst Beat · ProblemLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
04
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to illustrate expense growth and provides a detailed textual argument regarding ROIC, operating margins, and share price collapse.Macellum Big Lots Letter March 2020 · macellum-big-lots-letter-march-2020
Document Independent analyst Beat · ProblemLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
05
The slide uses a comparison table to highlight the underperformance of Big Lots relative to its off-price retail peers.Macellum Big Lots Letter March 2020 · macellum-big-lots-letter-march-2020
Document Independent analyst Beat · ProblemLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
06
The slide argues for the monetization of real estate assets and criticizes the Board's past capital allocation decisions.Macellum Big Lots Letter March 2020 · macellum-big-lots-letter-march-2020
Document Independent analyst Beat · AgitateLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
07
The slide highlights a decline in investor confidence and P/E multiples following the Board's guidance revisions.Macellum Big Lots Letter March 2020 · macellum-big-lots-letter-march-2020
Document Independent analyst Beat · AgitateLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
08
Page 8 of an activist investor presentation.Macellum Big Lots Letter March 2020 · macellum-big-lots-letter-march-2020
Document Independent analyst Beat · AgitateLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
09
This is a letter-style slide from an activist investor group (Macellum/Ancora) proposing board changes and operational improvements.Macellum Big Lots Letter March 2020 · macellum-big-lots-letter-march-2020
Document Independent analyst Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
05
The slide presents a critical argument against the board's performance, supported by a table of insider stock sales.Macellum Christopher Banks Letter April 2015 · macellum-christopher-banks-letter-april-2015
Document Independent analyst Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
02
This is a text-heavy slide from an activist investor presentation detailing operational failures.Macellum Letter to Christopher Banks Jun 2015 · macellum-letter-to-christopher-banks-jun-2015
Document Independent analyst Beat · ProblemLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
03
This appears to be page 3 of an activist investor letter or presentation.Macellum Letter to Christopher Banks Jun 2015 · macellum-letter-to-christopher-banks-jun-2015
Document Independent analyst Beat · AgitateLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
04
This is a page from an activist investor presentation (Macellum Advisors) criticizing the board of Christopher & Banks.Macellum Letter to Christopher Banks Jun 2015 · macellum-letter-to-christopher-banks-jun-2015
Document Independent analyst Beat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
04
The slide uses a 'villain critique' approach to justify activist intervention by highlighting specific operational and governance failures.Macellum Perry Ellis Presentation April 2014 · macellum-perry-ellis-presentation-april-2014
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
05
The slide uses the term 'Opportunities' ironically to refer to excessive pay practices.Macellum Perry Ellis Presentation April 2014 · macellum-perry-ellis-presentation-april-2014
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
13
The 5-year TSR data is highlighted with a red dashed box to emphasize the long-term underperformance.Macellum Spartan Nash Presentation May 2022 · macellum-spartan-nash-presentation-may-2022
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
14
Uses a callout box to anchor the 'lowest stock price' argument.Macellum Spartan Nash Presentation May 2022 · macellum-spartan-nash-presentation-may-2022
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
15
The SPTN bar is highlighted with a red dashed border to draw attention to its underperformance relative to the peer groups.Macellum Spartan Nash Presentation May 2022 · macellum-spartan-nash-presentation-may-2022
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
16
The slide uses a red dashed box to highlight the underperformance of SPTN relative to UNFI.Macellum Spartan Nash Presentation May 2022 · macellum-spartan-nash-presentation-may-2022
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
17
The chart uses a $100 investment baseline to compare total return performance.Macellum Spartan Nash Presentation May 2022 · macellum-spartan-nash-presentation-may-2022
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
18
The slide uses a table to contrast capital expenditure with declining profitability metrics.Macellum Spartan Nash Presentation May 2022 · macellum-spartan-nash-presentation-may-2022
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
19
The table includes specific acquisition context for Caito and Martin's.Macellum Spartan Nash Presentation May 2022 · macellum-spartan-nash-presentation-may-2022
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
20
The slide uses a comparison table to expose operational underperformance relative to peers.Macellum Spartan Nash Presentation May 2022 · macellum-spartan-nash-presentation-may-2022
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
21
The slide uses two tables and one bar chart to demonstrate underperformance relative to peers.Macellum Spartan Nash Presentation May 2022 · macellum-spartan-nash-presentation-may-2022
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
22
The slide uses a comparison table to frame the company's EBITDA decline as a failure of board oversight.Macellum Spartan Nash Presentation May 2022 · macellum-spartan-nash-presentation-may-2022
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit