anlak storytelling
All kinds
Document kinds
Loading document kinds...

Primary corpus lens for browsing and insights. Selection lives in the URL.

All formats
Orientation
Loading formats...

Landscape, portrait, square, or unknown document geometry.

Unlock
slides · global inventory

Fraud Exposure

Framework collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.

Search Insights JSON Unlock
Matching slides 6,793
Current window 1-60
Pages 114
Rows per page 60
Framework: Fraud Exposureclear collectionreset all
18 30 60

Framework

1-60 of 6,793

filter-aware
06
The slide uses a 'villain_critique' approach to undermine management credibility by contrasting past promises with actual results.Commvault Systems, Inc. (CVLT) · Jesse Cohn and Jason Genrich
Shareholder letter Activist investor Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
33
The chart uses a split axis or break to represent the high negative values for the top countries compared to the positive values for the bottom countries.e-Conomy SEA Unlocking the $200 billion digital opportunity in Southeast Asia · Google, Temasek
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Mece Breakdown1 hit
05
The slide uses a waterfall-style bridge to compare the TOB price against book value and NAV.Toyota Industries Corporation (6201) · Elliott Investment Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem Identification1 hit
17
The slide uses a structured table format to contrast key issues with background context and specific concerns.Toyota Industries Corporation (6201) · Elliott Investment Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitation1 hit
46
Uses numbered callouts (1, 2, 3) to link specific bridge chart components to explanatory text blocks.Toyota Industries Corporation (6201) · Elliott Investment Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
05
The slide uses a waterfall-style bridge to show the undervaluation of the TOB price compared to NAV.Toyota Industries Corporation (6201.T) · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
13
The slide uses a combination of financial data (ROIC comparison) and news citations to build a case for governance failure.Toyota Industries Corporation (6201.T) · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
16
The slide uses screenshots of news articles to establish credibility and frame the scandal as a governance failure.Toyota Industries Corporation (6201.T) · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
17
The slide uses a structured table format to highlight governance failures in a M&A transaction.Toyota Industries Corporation (6201.T) · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
20
The slide uses a 'violation' or 'contradiction' matrix format to map specific regulatory guidelines against the company's alleged failures.Toyota Industries Corporation (6201.T) · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
22
The slide highlights a contradiction between the board's previous stance on price inadequacy and their final recommendation.Toyota Industries Corporation (6201.T) · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
46
Includes two waterfall charts comparing FY25/3 results to FY26/3 guidance, and a third waterfall chart from FY24/3 as a precedent for similar accounting practices.Toyota Industries Corporation (6201.T) · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
06
This is a text-heavy page from a shareholder letter, likely part of an activist campaign by Elliott.Toyota Industries Corporation (6201) · Aaron Tai and Gordon Singer
Shareholder letter Activist investor Beat · The MonsterLoop · The Reveal1 hit
14
Uses a before-after style comparison to expose a flaw in the current governance calculation.Toyota Industries Corporation (6201) · Aaron Tai and Gordon Singer
Shareholder letter Activist investor Beat · The Victory1 hit
55
The slide uses a 'Damaged Credibility' framing to undermine management's forward-looking guidance.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
96
Uses a 'ripped paper' visual effect to contrast two different data sources.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
97
Uses a line chart to show performance during COO tenure and a bar chart to show relative underperformance across multiple time horizons.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
99
The table contrasts 'Company's Flawed Methodology' with 'Correct Methodology' across various timeframes.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
101
The slide highlights a specific technical manipulation in peer group benchmarking.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
104
The slide uses a dual-axis chart to overlay commodity prices on company opex to demonstrate that management is taking credit for market-driven cost reductions.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
153
This is a text-heavy activist slide focusing on governance reform and board accountability.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
29
This is a transcript-based slide used to frame a narrative of management manipulation of performance data.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Regulatory filing Activist investor Loop · Before After1 hit
20
The slide uses a 'sandbagging' narrative to frame management's communication with analysts as a defensive tactic.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Regulatory filing Activist investor Beat · SolutionLoop · Quick Win Big Bet1 hit
15
This is a text-heavy slide from an activist investor deck (Elliott) criticizing Phillips 66 leadership and governance.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
02
This is a text-heavy page from a shareholder letter, likely part of an activist campaign.Mitek Systems, Inc. (MITK) · Jesse Cohn
Shareholder letter Activist investor Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Anchor1 hit
14
The table highlights the 'Display' segment in a red box to emphasize the losses.AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose ContradictionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
15
The chart uses a downward-sloping line to emphasize the negative trend in losses.AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose ContradictionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
25
The slide uses a waterfall chart to demonstrate capital inefficiency in AOL's display business strategy.AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
28
The slide uses a table to contrast Patch's performance against the broader Display segment, highlighting the -1131% margin.AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
10
Uses a dual-chart layout to contrast capital allocation (spending) with market outcome (enterprise value decline).DSP Group, Inc. (DSPG) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · AgitateLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
14
The slide uses a table to contrast management guidance with actual results, calculating the absolute and percentage misses.DSP Group, Inc. (DSPG) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · AgitateLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
16
Uses red boxes to highlight the unrealistic market share growth and the resulting negative fully allocated operating income.DSP Group, Inc. (DSPG) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · AgitateLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
17
Uses a red circle to highlight the specific contradiction in the 2012 forecast (13.0M vs 5.0M).DSP Group, Inc. (DSPG) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · AgitateLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
26
This is a classic activist 'villain' or 'conflict of interest' slide, using historical context to frame current governance issues.DSP Group, Inc. (DSPG) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · AgitateLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
28
The slide uses a quote box to highlight the specific terms of the expired agreement.DSP Group, Inc. (DSPG) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · AgitateLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
33
DSP Group, Inc. (DSPG)DSP Group, Inc. (DSPG) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · AgitateLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
34
The slide uses a table to contrast long board tenure with zero or negligible stock ownership to argue against board alignment with shareholders.DSP Group, Inc. (DSPG) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · AgitateLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
39
The table highlights the discrepancy between revenue and operating profit/EBITDA, suggesting mismanagement of R&D and SG&A expenses.DSP Group, Inc. (DSPG) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · SolutionLoop · Quick Win Big Bet1 hit
11
The slide uses two tables to isolate the poor performance of the DOC segment compared to the IP segment.Tessera Technologies Inc. (TSRA) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose Contradiction1 hit
17
The slide uses a direct quote (the resignation letter) to substantiate the claim of board dysfunction.Tessera Technologies Inc. (TSRA) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
42
Includes a specific callout box and arrow highlighting the 'Troubling decline due to non-renewals'.Tessera Technologies Inc. (TSRA) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Propose Solution1 hit
43
The slide uses a bar chart to contrast rising expenses with the claim of lack of output (patents).Tessera Technologies Inc. (TSRA) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Propose Solution1 hit
16
Uses a visual metaphor of a climber (management) hanging from a cliff with weights labeled CEO and BOARD.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
39
The slide uses expert testimony and financial data to frame the consulting spend as wasteful.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
44
Uses a combination of map visualization and bar chart to highlight underperformance.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
55
Uses a combination of bar charts to demonstrate management's failure to meet financial and operational targets.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
57
Uses market performance data to argue that the board failed to act on a midstream sale at an optimal time.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
96
Uses a line chart to show historical underperformance and a bar chart to show relative underperformance across multiple time horizons.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
98
The slide uses a table to expose a contradiction in the company's reporting methodology.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
100
The slide uses a 'synthetic basket' of peers to manipulate performance metrics.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
106
Uses a contrast-based framing to debunk a specific company claim.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
110
Uses a waterfall-bridge chart to debunk a specific management claim regarding cost allocation.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
114
Uses a quote from Greg Goff to establish credibility and personal stance.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
06
The chart shows Phillips 66 underperforming relative to the peer group and S&P 500 over the 2020-2024 period.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose Contradiction1 hit
16
The slide uses a 'before-after' style framing by showing the company's original slide (left) and the activist's critique (right).Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose Contradiction1 hit
19
Uses two distinct charts to prove the same point: one focusing on correlation with MPC, the other on VLO/MPC peer group performance.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose Contradiction1 hit
22
Uses a 'before-after' style comparison of management's claims vs. reality, specifically targeting the CEO's accounting for turnarounds.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose Contradiction1 hit
26
Uses a red 'X' overlay on the original company's table to visually invalidate their claims.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose Contradiction1 hit
27
Uses a three-column comparison structure to systematically dismantle specific corporate claims.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose Contradiction1 hit
30
Uses a combination of bar charts, scatter plots, and box plots to demonstrate peer parity.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose Contradiction1 hit