slides · global inventory
All filtered slides
Global slide inventory for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Corpus coverage
319,975 slides
319,974 are described (100%), so the treemap can explain the corpus instead of just counting files.
- Total slides
- 319,975
- Described
- 319,974
- Pending
- 1
100%ready for canon
Slide type composition
dynamicclickable
Slide type
Showing 319,974 described slides — 100.0% of 319,975 rendered pages
+Context & problem43,76713.7% · 6,592 docs+Data & charts72,62022.7% · 8,666 docs+Meta & navigation45,93614.4% · 9,739 docs+Recommend & act67,04121.0% · 9,324 docs+Cases & evidence31,2569.8% · 6,067 docs+Frameworks2,1230.7% · 1,232 docs+Appendix35,68211.2% · 6,614 docs+Other21,5496.7% · 5,566 docs
Tile area is proportional to slide count. Click a category to open its subtype map.
all document kinds · all orientations
Slide collection
310,081-310,140 of 319,975
117
The chart is a waterfall-style bar chart representing individual school utilization rates.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
118
The slide uses a dual-line projection model (best/worst case) to illustrate future facility needs.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
119
The slide uses a peer benchmark to argue for potential cost savings through operational efficiency.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
120
The slide uses a house metaphor to represent a school, with internal staff and operational costs mapped to specific budget line items.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
121
The slide uses a table to present a financial impact analysis of school consolidation.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
122
The slide uses peer benchmarking to establish credibility for financial projections.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
123
The slide uses a table format to map potential gains to their descriptions.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
124
The slide uses a waterfall chart to show cumulative savings from three sets of school closures, totaling ~35M.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
125
The slide uses a simple two-box flow diagram to connect property value realization to reinvestment goals.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
126
The slide uses a causal flow structure (left side: financial inputs; right side: programmatic outputs).5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
127
Uses a case study approach to illustrate successful resource concentration strategies.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
128
The slide uses a process-flow diagram to show how three distinct criteria lead to a unified decision-making framework.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
129
5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
130
The slide outlines cost drivers (classrooms, transportation, private tuition) and the financial impact of a 12-year inclusion transition plan.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
131
The slide contrasts national trends with specific BPS budget data points.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
132
The slide uses a hierarchical tree diagram to decompose the $265m total special education budget.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
133
The slide uses a checkmark matrix to illustrate the relationship between spending categories and cost levers.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
134
5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
135
Includes two bar charts: one for state-level data and one for district-level data (Boston vs MA average).5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
136
The chart uses a scatter plot to visualize the correlation between socioeconomic status and special education designation.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
137
The chart uses a horizontal bar chart to compare individual school referral rates against the district average of 2.8%.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
138
The chart is a horizontal bar chart showing classification rates by school, grouped by school level (HS, MS, ES).5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
139
The chart includes a trend line indicating a positive correlation.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
140
The chart compares BPS data from 2012-2015 against Massachusetts state data from 2013-2014.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
141
The slide uses a structured table to contrast current staffing inefficiencies with potential strategic shifts.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
142
The slide uses a structured table format to present policy-based cost-saving and service-improvement opportunities.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
143
5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
144
The chart shows a clear outlier distribution, with some schools having very high percentages of students requiring specialized transport.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
145
The slide highlights inefficiencies in bus routing and provides context on student transportation logistics.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
146
The slide uses a dual bar chart comparison to highlight inefficiency in student transportation for special education.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
147
5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
148
The chart is a long-tail bar chart showing tuition spend per site.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
149
The slide highlights specific departments (DCF, DYS, DMH) and legal/administrative triggers for student placements.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
150
5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
151
The slide uses a two-column layout to contrast the research-based benefits of inclusion with the operational plan for implementation.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
152
Includes a disclaimer box regarding the accuracy of the cost/benefit analysis.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
153
The chart illustrates a phased implementation strategy for special education inclusion, segmented by network.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
154
The slide highlights that short-term costs are high due to the need for new paraprofessionals and specialists, with no immediate cost savings expected.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
155
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to show FTE growth and a data table to show the corresponding financial impact over time.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
156
The chart illustrates a transition from high-cost separate classrooms to lower-cost inclusion models, showing a crossover point where savings exceed costs.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
157
5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
158
The slide provides a high-level synthesis of findings from surveys, interviews, and org chart analysis.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
159
The slide uses a pyramid structure to analyze organizational health, specifically focusing on span of control (direct reports) and layer distribution.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
160
5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
161
The slide uses a gap analysis approach to contrast current organizational culture with desired future state.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
162
The slide uses qualitative quotes alongside quantitative survey data to illustrate a disconnect between departmental and district-level goal clarity.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
163
Includes a direct quote from a Cabinet Department leader illustrating the disconnect between data collection and strategic use.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
164
The slide uses a mix of qualitative quotes and quantitative survey results to illustrate organizational fragmentation.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
165
Includes survey data visualization and direct quotes from Cabinet Department leaders.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
166
The slide uses a simple bulleted list to contrast benefits for two distinct stakeholder groups.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
167
5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
168
The slide uses a structured table format to present operational improvement opportunities.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
169
5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
170
The slide uses two horizontal bar charts to compare performance metrics across districts, with 'Boston' highlighted in yellow.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
171
Includes a pie chart showing percentage breakdown and a stacked bar chart showing dollar amounts in millions.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
172
The slide uses a series of bar charts to compare total costs, student populations, and cost per student.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
173
The slide uses a horizontal bar chart for peer benchmarking and a grouped bar chart for site-specific participation.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
174
The chart is a horizontal bar chart showing individual school participation rates against a district average (Ø 67).5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
175
5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
176
The slide uses a waterfall chart to decompose total PD spending into specific categories, highlighting fragmentation.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations 1 hit