slides · global inventory
Comparison Frame
Framework collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Matching slides 6,294
Current window 1,201-1,230
Pages 210
Rows per page 30
Framework
1,201-1,230 of 6,294
02
The slide uses a combination of a line chart for valuation erosion and bar charts for relative performance benchmarking.Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ALXN) · Elliott
Shareholder letter Activist investor Beat · Problem1 hit
07
The slide uses a scatter plot to demonstrate that Alexion is undervalued compared to its peers with similar growth profiles.Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ALXN) · Elliott
Shareholder letter Activist investor 1 hit
07
Includes detailed footnotes regarding accounting adjustments for turnaround expenses and pro-rata MLP EBITDA.Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · ProblemLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
08
The slide uses a 'preempt_rebuttal' style to explain why the headline consolidated multiple is misleading.Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · ProblemLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
09
Uses a split-screen comparison to highlight the accounting distortion of including 100% of MPLX debt/cap in the MPC valuation.Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · ProblemLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
15
The slide uses a comparison table to quantify the tax deferral benefit of acting before a regulatory deadline.Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitation1 hit
17
The slide uses a bar chart combined with a data table to compare MPLX against industry peers.Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitation1 hit
28
Includes two scatter plots comparing Distribution CAGR vs. Yield for GP and MLP peers, with Elliott Management's assumptions highlighted.Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution1 hit
32
Includes a callout box critiquing Marathon's stated profitability metrics.Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution1 hit
33
Uses red/blue color coding to distinguish Marathon (red) from peers (blue) and indicate retail ownership status.Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution1 hit
34
The slide uses a comparison frame to argue that Marathon is not operating more efficiently than its peers regarding inventory management.Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution1 hit
35
The chart highlights Speedway in red to distinguish it from the blue-colored peer group.Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution1 hit
37
Uses a stacked bar chart to contrast purchase multiples vs. fully synergized multiples against the valuation benchmarks of Speedway and Marathon.Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution1 hit
38
Includes a specific EBITDA opportunity calculation based on closing 50% of the margin delta.Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution1 hit
39
Includes two expert quotes supporting the thesis that third-party operators increase utilization.Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution1 hit
03
Includes a direct quote from a Cowen analyst regarding the failure of the 2019 AdvantEdge66 program.Phillips 66 (PSX) · John Pike and Mike Tomkins
Shareholder letter Activist investor Beat · Problem (Identify pain)1 hit
18
The slide uses a comparison table to contrast 'Updates in the Revised TOB' with 'Remaining Concerns' across four key issue areas.Toyota Industries Corporation (6201) · Elliott Investment Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitation1 hit
25
The slide uses a custom comparison table structure to highlight TICO's competitive advantages over its closest peer.Toyota Industries Corporation (6201) · Elliott Investment Management
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
31
The slide uses a decision-matrix style layout to contrast outcomes based on TOB success/failure.Toyota Industries Corporation (6201) · Elliott Investment Management
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · So What Cascade1 hit
34
The slide uses a structured comparison framework to contrast current operational/governance issues with proposed strategic improvements.Toyota Industries Corporation (6201) · Elliott Investment Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution1 hit
37
The slide advocates for the middle column (issuer buybacks) as the preferred strategy.Toyota Industries Corporation (6201) · Elliott Investment Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution1 hit
18
The slide uses a three-column structure: Key Issue, Changes in Revised TOB, and Remaining Concerns.Toyota Industries Corporation (6201.T) · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
25
The slide uses a comparison table structure to contrast two companies across revenue composition, growth, market share, margins, R&D, and geographic coverage.Toyota Industries Corporation (6201.T) · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
31
The slide uses a decision-tree style comparison to argue against a tender offer (TOB).Toyota Industries Corporation (6201.T) · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
37
The slide advocates for mutual cancellation as the preferred strategy due to lower tax burden compared to market sale.Toyota Industries Corporation (6201.T) · Elliott Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
06
The slide uses a combination of a summary returns table and three time-series line charts to demonstrate long-term underperformance.DSP Group, Inc. (DSPG) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · AgitateLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
12
Uses peer benchmarking to infer internal profitability metrics for a company that does not disclose them.DSP Group, Inc. (DSPG) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · AgitateLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
05
The slide uses a comparative framing technique to establish the superiority of the activist's nominees over the incumbent board.Tessera Technologies Inc. (TSRA) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem Statement1 hit
08
Includes a table of summary returns and three line charts (5-year, 3-year, 1-year) highlighting the impact of a Starboard 13D filing.Tessera Technologies Inc. (TSRA) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
13
Includes a bar chart showing revenue vs EBIT decline and a table comparing growth and EBITDA margins against peers.Tessera Technologies Inc. (TSRA) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose Contradiction1 hit