anlak storytelling
All kinds
Document kinds
Loading document kinds...

Primary corpus lens for browsing and insights. Selection lives in the URL.

All formats
Orientation
Loading formats...

Landscape, portrait, square, or unknown document geometry.

Unlock
slides · global inventory

All filtered slides

Global slide inventory for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.

Search Insights JSON Unlock
Corpus coverage

319,975 slides

319,974 are described (100%), so the treemap can explain the corpus instead of just counting files.

Total slides
319,975
Described
319,974
Pending
1

Slide type composition

dynamicclickable
Slide type

Showing 319,974 described slides — 100.0% of 319,975 rendered pages

+Context & problem43,76713.7% · 6,592 docs+Data & charts72,62022.7% · 8,666 docs+Meta & navigation45,93614.4% · 9,739 docs+Recommend & act67,04121.0% · 9,324 docs+Cases & evidence31,2569.8% · 6,067 docs+Frameworks2,1230.7% · 1,232 docs+Appendix35,68211.2% · 6,614 docs+Other21,5496.7% · 5,566 docs

Tile area is proportional to slide count. Click a category to open its subtype map.

all document kinds · all orientations
18 30 60

Slide collection

23,761-23,820 of 319,975

filter-aware
10
The slide uses a simple 2-row table structure to categorize requirements for selection and training.TEF Application Evaluation 2019 · Accenture
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
11
The slide outlines a scoring methodology for business evaluation, likely used in a competition or grant selection process.TEF Application Evaluation 2019 · Accenture
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
12
The slide uses a structured list format to outline operational pillars.TEF Application Evaluation 2019 · Accenture
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
13
TEF Application Evaluation 2019TEF Application Evaluation 2019 · Accenture
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
14
The map uses bubble sizes to represent the volume of applications per region, with tables providing country-level breakdowns.TEF Application Evaluation 2019 · Accenture
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Zoom In1 hit
15
The slide uses a color-coded legend for ranking categories (Very High to Very Low) and includes a disclaimer about the UN geoscheme.TEF Application Evaluation 2019 · Accenture
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Zoom In1 hit
16
The map shows percentages by zone, while the tables provide raw counts and percentages by state and zone.TEF Application Evaluation 2019 · Accenture
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Zoom In1 hit
17
The slide uses a horizontal bar chart for sector distribution and a pie chart for business stage distribution.TEF Application Evaluation 2019 · Accenture
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Iceberg1 hit
18
The map uses pie charts to represent gender distribution per region, while tables provide granular data for individual countries.TEF Application Evaluation 2019 · Accenture
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Iceberg1 hit
19
The chart displays raw counts for each gender within each rank tier, along with percentage breakdowns.TEF Application Evaluation 2019 · Accenture
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Iceberg1 hit
20
The slide uses a series of maps to show geographic coverage and gender participation metrics below each map.TEF Application Evaluation 2019 · Accenture
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
21
The slide uses a combination of a data table for sector percentages and a series of bar charts for business stage counts.TEF Application Evaluation 2019 · Accenture
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
22
TEF Application Evaluation 2019TEF Application Evaluation 2019 · Accenture
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
23
The slide uses a funnel metaphor to show the reduction of applications, followed by an additive equation to reach the final count.TEF Application Evaluation 2019 · Accenture
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Voice Of Customer1 hit
24
The slide uses a bubble map overlay on a shaded regional map of Africa, supported by detailed data tables for each region.TEF Application Evaluation 2019 · Accenture
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Voice Of Customer1 hit
25
Data presented in tables by region and pie charts overlaid on a map of Africa.TEF Application Evaluation 2019 · Accenture
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Voice Of Customer1 hit
26
TEF Application Evaluation 2019TEF Application Evaluation 2019 · Accenture
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
27
The table shows a subset of data (1,112 entries) despite the headline claiming 3,050 applications.TEF Application Evaluation 2019 · Accenture
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
28
TEF Application Evaluation 2019TEF Application Evaluation 2019 · Accenture
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
29
TEF Application Evaluation 2019TEF Application Evaluation 2019 · Accenture
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
30
TEF Application Evaluation 2019TEF Application Evaluation 2019 · Accenture
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
31
TEF Application Evaluation 2019TEF Application Evaluation 2019 · Accenture
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
01
Slide 1
The Combustion Engine Business Model in the Age of ElectromobilityThe Combustion Engine Business Model in the Age of Electromobility · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
02
The slide uses a lettered list (A, B, C) to organize high-level findings.The Combustion Engine Business Model in the Age of Electromobility · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
03
The slide uses a 'D' icon, likely indicating it is part of a section or a specific report series.The Combustion Engine Business Model in the Age of Electromobility · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
04
The Combustion Engine Business Model in the Age of ElectromobilityThe Combustion Engine Business Model in the Age of Electromobility · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
05
The slide uses a split-screen layout: left side provides context/evidence of current debates, right side frames the core strategic question.The Combustion Engine Business Model in the Age of Electromobility · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem1 hit
06
The slide uses a lettered list (A-D) to structure the methodology, with corresponding thumbnails of the actual slides.The Combustion Engine Business Model in the Age of Electromobility · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
07
Includes a global aggregate bar chart and regional breakdowns with a map visualization.The Combustion Engine Business Model in the Age of Electromobility · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · AgitationLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
08
The slide uses a consistent color-coded legend for scenarios across three regional charts.The Combustion Engine Business Model in the Age of Electromobility · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · AgitationLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
09
The slide uses a maturity-model-like progression to categorize OEM strategies.The Combustion Engine Business Model in the Age of Electromobility · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · AgitationLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
10
The slide uses a custom table structure to compare strategic archetypes in the automotive industry.The Combustion Engine Business Model in the Age of Electromobility · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · AgitationLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
11
The slide uses a 3x3 matrix structure to evaluate different OEM archetypes (BEV laggards, Midfield, BEV pioneers) against market scenarios (Accelerated, Current, Slower).The Combustion Engine Business Model in the Age of Electromobility · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · AgitationLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
12
The slide uses a matrix structure to compare three OEM archetypes against three market scenarios, with color-coded NPV impacts.The Combustion Engine Business Model in the Age of Electromobility · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Agitation1 hit
13
The slide uses a matrix-like structure to compare profit outcomes across three archetypes and three market scenarios.The Combustion Engine Business Model in the Age of Electromobility · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · AgitationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
14
The Combustion Engine Business Model in the Age of ElectromobilityThe Combustion Engine Business Model in the Age of Electromobility · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
15
The Combustion Engine Business Model in the Age of ElectromobilityThe Combustion Engine Business Model in the Age of Electromobility · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
16
The Combustion Engine Business Model in the Age of ElectromobilityThe Combustion Engine Business Model in the Age of Electromobility · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
01
Slide 1
The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind?The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
02
The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind?The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
03
The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind?The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
04
The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind?The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
05
The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind?The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
06
Includes IACCM logo and a vintage illustration.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
07
The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind?The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
08
The IACCM '10 Pitfalls' graphic is used as a diagnostic reference point for why a new solution is needed.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
09
The slide uses a metaphorical graphic of a globe hatching from an egg, symbolizing an 'emerging era'.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
10
The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind?The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
11
The slide lists office locations by region and provides high-level firm statistics.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
12
Includes AEP, Purchasing Chessboard, ROSMA, and HPT frameworks.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
13
The slide acts as a bibliography or catalog of previous publications.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
14
The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind?The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
15
The slide uses a chevron-based process flow diagram to illustrate the procurement lifecycle.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
16
The slide uses a matrix-like layout to segment vendors by functional area and solution type.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
17
The slide uses a hub-and-spoke model to represent an ecosystem of microservices.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
18
The slide uses a maturity-model-like progression from monolithic suites to best-of-breed ecosystems.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
19
The diagram maps a procurement process from user request to delivery, highlighting the role of a centralized AI data hub.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
20
The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind?The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
21
The chart uses a treemap layout to represent market size by spend volume, with color-coding to distinguish governance requirements.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
22
The slide uses a 2x2 matrix to categorize vendors. It includes annotations explaining the characteristics of each quadrant.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit