anlak storytelling
All kinds
Document kinds
Loading document kinds...

Primary corpus lens for browsing and insights. Selection lives in the URL.

All formats
Orientation
Loading formats...

Landscape, portrait, square, or unknown document geometry.

Unlock
slides · global inventory

All filtered slides

Global slide inventory for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.

Search Insights JSON Unlock
Corpus coverage

319,975 slides

319,974 are described (100%), so the treemap can explain the corpus instead of just counting files.

Total slides
319,975
Described
319,974
Pending
1

Slide type composition

dynamicclickable
Slide type

Showing 319,974 described slides — 100.0% of 319,975 rendered pages

+Context & problem43,76713.7% · 6,592 docs+Data & charts72,62022.7% · 8,666 docs+Meta & navigation45,93614.4% · 9,739 docs+Recommend & act67,04121.0% · 9,324 docs+Cases & evidence31,2569.8% · 6,067 docs+Frameworks2,1230.7% · 1,232 docs+Appendix35,68211.2% · 6,614 docs+Other21,5496.7% · 5,566 docs

Tile area is proportional to slide count. Click a category to open its subtype map.

all document kinds · all orientations
18 30 60

Slide collection

22,921-22,980 of 319,975

filter-aware
39
Uses Harvey balls to represent qualitative scores for online ad improvements.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
40
Uses Harvey balls to represent qualitative scores for online advertising improvements.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
41
BCG logo present. Internet survey, n=1736.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
01
Slide 1
Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011)Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
02
Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011)Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
03
The slide outlines the mandate from ORR, ATOC, and Network Rail, and clarifies the relationship with the McNulty Rail VfM review.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
04
The table acts as a decision matrix for the four selected options.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
05
The slide presents a structured comparison of four policy options for financial risk/reward sharing in the rail industry.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
06
The slide continues a list of options, starting from number 5.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
07
The slide lists specific criteria and the corresponding key questions used for evaluation.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
08
The slide serves as a methodological disclosure for an executive summary section.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
09
The table uses a qualitative scoring system (++, +, 0, -, --) to evaluate options.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
10
Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011)Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
11
The slide uses a traffic light system (green check, red X, question mark) to indicate implementation status for 8 options.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
12
The slide outlines why train operators are generally unsupportive of cost/revenue sharing unless they have direct control/influence (Option 8).Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
13
The slide is part of a series (2 of 2) and references a previous L.E.K. report on Alternative Railway Structures.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
14
The table uses a qualitative scoring system (+, 0, -) to compare the 'Now' state against the 'After implementing HS with multiple owners' state.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
15
The slide outlines a specific implementation strategy involving CP5 and CP6 periods.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
16
L.E.K. consulting slide regarding rail industry cost and revenue sharing.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
17
L.E.K. consulting slide discussing rail industry cost and revenue sharing mechanisms.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
18
The slide uses a central arrow to represent the 'Cultural change' required to bridge the two approaches.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
19
Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011)Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
20
The slide uses a 'carrot vs stick' metaphor to describe the strategic approach to industry partnerships.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
21
The slide uses a Gantt chart format to map specific policy milestones against a calendar timeline.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
22
Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011)Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
23
The slide outlines the mandate from ORR, ATOC, and Network Rail, and references a related study for the McNulty Rail VfM review.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Golden Circle1 hit
24
The slide clarifies that the study assumes no radical changes to the roles of train operators or Network Rail.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Golden Circle1 hit
25
The slide lists specific dates, workshop types, and participating organizations in the rail industry.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Golden Circle1 hit
26
The table uses a color-coded matrix to show which components (NR costs/revenue, TOC revenue, TOC costs) are included or excluded for four specific options.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
27
The slide details four specific regulatory or contractual mechanisms for cost/revenue sharing in the rail industry.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
28
The slide is a continuation of a previous list, focusing on options 5-8.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
29
Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011)Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
30
Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011)Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
31
The slide uses a numbered list format to categorize ten distinct areas of consideration for a sharing mechanism.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
32
The chart uses a waterfall-style stacked bar approach to show the composition of TOC, Expenditure, and Revenue requirement.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
33
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to visualize the composition of TOC revenue and a list to justify inclusion/exclusion criteria.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
34
The table evaluates four scenarios: No sharing, Full sharing, TOC pax and sch 8 revenue shared only, and TOC pax revenue shared only.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
35
The slide uses a categorization framework to justify a policy recommendation regarding Network Rail (NR) and Train Operating Companies (TOCs).Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
36
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to visualize the total cost base and a list to justify inclusion/exclusion decisions for specific cost categories.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
37
The table compares 'No sharing', 'Full sharing', 'TOC and NR cost sharing', and 'NR cost sharing only' across P&L items (revenue/cost) for TOC and NR.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
38
Includes a quote from a stakeholder regarding the risk of gaming the system.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
39
The slide is part of a series (1 of 6) regarding Network Rail costs.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
40
The table includes adjustments for non-PR08 funded enhancements and deferred expenditure.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
41
Source: NR, Delivery Plan Update, March 2010. Note: * Including CIRAS fee.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
42
The slide evaluates the appropriateness of cost/revenue sharing mechanisms for each of the three identified influence mechanisms.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
43
The slide uses a standard comparison matrix format to evaluate strategic options.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
44
The slide compares Vertical Integration (VI) against cost/revenue sharing mechanisms in the context of UK railway structures.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
45
Part of a series of slides analyzing sharing mechanism practicalities.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
46
The slide discusses 'option value' in the context of rail franchise bidding and Value for Money (VfM).Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
47
The slide highlights the discrepancy between functional organization and geographical reporting, showing maps for both operating and strategic routes.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
48
The slide critiques the PR08 EBS mechanism as ineffective due to its national scope, which weakens the link between operator actions and financial results.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
49
The slide discusses structural changes to rail network management regions.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
50
The chart uses bubble size to represent total train kms. A vertical line at 70% highlights the threshold mentioned in the title.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
51
The slide argues that the underlying data requirements and mapping challenges remain largely the same regardless of the chosen geographic entity.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
52
Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011)Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
53
The slide uses quotes from the PR08 Determination and Network Rail's CEO to substantiate the claim of uncertainty.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
54
The slide discusses the potential impact of the McNulty Rail VfM review on TOC business models.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
55
The slide uses quotes from stakeholders to emphasize the difficulty of pricing regulatory risk into bids.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
56
Discusses RPI-X regulation, capex/opex reclassification risks, and ORR/NR/TOC incentive alignment.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
57
L.E.K. consulting slide, page 56.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit