slides · global inventory
All filtered slides
Global slide inventory for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Corpus coverage
319,975 slides
319,974 are described (100%), so the treemap can explain the corpus instead of just counting files.
- Total slides
- 319,975
- Described
- 319,974
- Pending
- 1
100%ready for canon
Slide type composition
dynamicclickable
Slide type
Showing 319,974 described slides — 100.0% of 319,975 rendered pages
+Context & problem43,76713.7% · 6,592 docs+Data & charts72,62022.7% · 8,666 docs+Meta & navigation45,93614.4% · 9,739 docs+Recommend & act67,04121.0% · 9,324 docs+Cases & evidence31,2569.8% · 6,067 docs+Frameworks2,1230.7% · 1,232 docs+Appendix35,68211.2% · 6,614 docs+Other21,5496.7% · 5,566 docs
Tile area is proportional to slide count. Click a category to open its subtype map.
all document kinds · all orientations
Slide collection
21,181-21,240 of 319,975
18
Includes a stacked bar chart showing severity distribution on a 1-7 Likert scale.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
19
The slide includes a list of specific countries with their election timing and internet penetration stats alongside a global heat map.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
20
This slide is from the Global Risks Report 2024, page 20. It uses a narrative structure to explain the risks of polarization and the erosion of truth.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
21
The slide uses a node-link diagram to show risk influence and relative influence between different global risk categories.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
22
The chart shows a distribution of severity scores for interstate armed conflict, with 8% of respondents rating it at the highest severity level (7).Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
23
The chart uses a dual-axis approach to correlate conflict frequency with fatality counts.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
24
Page 24 from Global Risks Report 2024.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
25
Data sourced from Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP).Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
26
Page 26 of the Global Risks Report 2024.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
27
Includes two distinct charts: a stacked bar chart for severity and a line chart for search interest over time.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
28
The slide uses two heat maps to visualize the shift in perceived economic risk across countries between 2022 and 2023.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
29
Contains two charts: Figure 1.17 (Inflation) and Figure 1.18 (Global PMI).Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
30
The slide is a text-heavy page from a report, likely the Global Risks Report 2024, discussing macroeconomic headwinds.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
31
The slide discusses the resilience of large corporations versus the vulnerability of SMEs and emerging economies to high interest rates.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
32
Global Risks Report 2024Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
33
Global Risks Report 2024Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
34
This is page 34 of a report, containing references 16 through 33.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
35
This is a continuation of a bibliography or reference list.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
36
This is a continuation of a bibliography or reference section.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
37
The chart uses a 2x2 matrix structure to categorize risks by short-term vs long-term severity.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
38
The slide includes a legend for risk categories (Economic, Environmental, Geopolitical, Societal, Technological) and detailed commentary on the trends.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
39
The table uses color-coding to represent risk categories: Economic (blue), Environmental (green), Geopolitical (orange), Societal (red), and Technological (purple).Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
40
The slide defines structural forces as long-term shifts in the arrangement of and relation between systemic elements of the global landscape.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
41
The slide uses a split-field image as a metaphor for environmental or systemic change.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
42
Data from World Economic Forum Global Risks Perception Survey 2023-2024. Uses a 1-7 Likert scale for severity.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
43
The slide highlights the complexity and interconnectedness of climate tipping points, noting that current models may underestimate non-linear impacts and cascading effects.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
44
Includes a network diagram showing interconnections between environmental and socioeconomic risks.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
45
The chart displays country-level risk rankings from the Executive Opinion Survey 2023, with color representing climate adaptation readiness.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
46
The chart highlights a significant gap between current finance flows and projected adaptation needs.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
47
Figure 2.9. Source: Climate Central, 2023. Light-blue overlay marks areas below water level.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
48
Contains footnotes referencing specific risks and investments.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
49
Contains two radar charts comparing survey responses across nine governance approaches.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
50
The slide presents a stacked bar chart comparing short-term (2 years) vs long-term (10 years) risk perception of AI.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
51
The slide uses a network graph to show risk interconnections. The text discusses the implications of AI market concentration on security and supply chains.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
52
The slide contains two distinct figures from the World Economic Forum Global Risks Report 2024.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
53
This appears to be a page from a report (Global Risks Report 2024, page 53).Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
54
Magazine-style page; Box 2.6 highlights concentration of AI power in a small set of Big Tech firms and founders. Photo credit: Michael Dziedzic / Unsplash.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
55
This slide is from the Global Risks Report 2024, page 55. It includes a main section on AI escalation and a callout box (Box 2.7) on novel bioweapons.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
56
The slide uses radar charts to visualize survey data across multiple categories of risk governance approaches.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
57
Data from World Economic Forum Global Risks Perception Survey 2023-2024.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
58
The chart uses a spaghetti plot approach to show global trends with specific highlighted data points annotated with historical events.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
59
The diagram uses node size to represent risk influence and edge thickness to represent relative influence, categorized by risk type.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
60
Data sourced from World Economic Forum Future of Jobs Report 2023.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
61
The chart uses a 2x2 matrix structure to highlight countries where both risks are perceived as high.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
62
The chart highlights the disparity between current projected spending and the financing needs required to reach Sustainable Development Goals by 2030.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
63
Figure 2.22 from Global Risks Report 2024.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
64
Contains two distinct sections: Post-SDGs and Stranded people. Includes a photo of a classroom.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
65
This slide is a text-heavy box from a report, likely Global Risks Report 2024.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
66
Page 66 from the Global Risks Report 2024.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
67
The slide contains a text-heavy analysis section followed by a figure (2.23) showing survey results on risk governance approaches.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
68
The slide uses a 100% stacked bar chart to visualize survey responses on a Likert scale.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
69
The slide uses a grouped bar chart format to compare two years of data for criminal markets and actors.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
70
The slide uses a node-link diagram to visualize risk interdependencies, categorized by economic, environmental, geopolitical, societal, and technological factors.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
71
The chart uses a dot plot/scatter-like visualization to map risk ranking (x-axis) against geographic regions (y-axis), with color representing criminality score.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
72
The chart uses a dot plot format to show risk ranking (x-axis) by region (y-axis), with color representing criminality score.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
73
This is a page from a report (Global Risks Report 2024). It contains two distinct sections: a box on the fentanyl epidemic and a section on state-enabled criminality.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
74
The chart uses color to represent corruption levels and bubble size to represent peace levels.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
75
The slide contains two radar charts comparing approaches to risk governance for two specific risk categories.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
76
Figure 2.31 from the World Economic Forum Global Risks Perception Survey 2022-2023.Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
77
Global Risks Report 2024Global Risks Report 2024 · World Economic Forum
Consulting deck Academic / think tank Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit