slides · global inventory
All filtered slides
Global slide inventory for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Corpus coverage
319,975 slides
319,974 are described (100%), so the treemap can explain the corpus instead of just counting files.
- Total slides
- 319,975
- Described
- 319,974
- Pending
- 1
100%ready for canon
Slide type composition
dynamicclickable
Slide type
Showing 319,974 described slides — 100.0% of 319,975 rendered pages
+Context & problem43,76713.7% · 6,592 docs+Data & charts72,62022.7% · 8,666 docs+Meta & navigation45,93614.4% · 9,739 docs+Recommend & act67,04121.0% · 9,324 docs+Cases & evidence31,2569.8% · 6,067 docs+Frameworks2,1230.7% · 1,232 docs+Appendix35,68211.2% · 6,614 docs+Other21,5496.7% · 5,566 docs
Tile area is proportional to slide count. Click a category to open its subtype map.
all document kinds · all orientations
Slide collection
13,861-13,920 of 319,975
31
The slide uses a combination of bar charts and tables to present financial data. It includes a specific callout regarding rebate rate assumptions.Purdue High Impact Interventions · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
32
Legal document exhibit page.Purdue High Impact Interventions · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
33
The slide uses a table to compare 'Traditional', 'Option 1', and 'Option 2' rebate structures.Purdue High Impact Interventions · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
34
The slide highlights that the initial coverage phase results in the highest net cost for the plan due to the distribution of pharma and CMS contributions.Purdue High Impact Interventions · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
35
The slide uses a waterfall-style bar chart to visualize the difference in rebate value between traditional contracts and Option 1.Purdue High Impact Interventions · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
36
The slide evaluates the financial impact of a specific contracting strategy (1 of 1) at CVS, concluding that the resulting share shift is insufficient to justify the strategy.Purdue High Impact Interventions · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
37
Purdue High Impact InterventionsPurdue High Impact Interventions · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
38
The slide uses a numbered list structure to present sequential or categorical considerations for contract design.Purdue High Impact Interventions · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
39
The slide includes a definition of the metric and a bar chart showing the rate of opioid-related OD/OUD events over time.Purdue High Impact Interventions · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
40
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to isolate the 4% figure, providing a definition of 'OxyContin exposure' in a callout box.Purdue High Impact Interventions · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
41
The chart illustrates that while specific OxyContin combinations account for varying percentages of events, the total OxyContin-related events represent 4% of all OD/OUD events.Purdue High Impact Interventions · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
42
The slide uses historical data from 2012-2016 to project 2017E-2019E. The base case is highlighted with a dashed box.Purdue High Impact Interventions · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
43
The slide uses a linear scale to illustrate the range of potential rebates.Purdue High Impact Interventions · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
44
The table compares two scenarios of rebate costs ($6k vs $14k) across 7 major commercial accounts.Purdue High Impact Interventions · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
45
Legal document filing page.Purdue High Impact Interventions · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
46
Legal discovery document, Exhibit R-T, page 46 of 50.Purdue High Impact Interventions · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
47
This is a text-heavy internal memo/email formatted as a slide, likely from a legal discovery document.Purdue High Impact Interventions · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
48
This appears to be a page from a legal exhibit containing an email correspondence.Purdue High Impact Interventions · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
49
This is a legal filing document page.Purdue High Impact Interventions · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
50
This is a legal exhibit document (Exhibit R-T) containing an email thread.Purdue High Impact Interventions · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
01
Includes author name, event, date, and McKinsey branding.Reinventing Construction Higher Productivity · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
02
The slide uses a visual chevron design to separate the text from the imagery.Reinventing Construction Higher Productivity · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
03
The slide uses a donut chart to show the 13% share of construction in global GDP and a bar chart to show the growth trend.Reinventing Construction Higher Productivity · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
04
The slide uses a combination of a line chart for historical trends and a bar chart for current productivity levels.Reinventing Construction Higher Productivity · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
05
The slide uses a comparative bar chart structure to show current vs potential states for three different stakeholder groups.Reinventing Construction Higher Productivity · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & ContextLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
06
The slide uses a color-coded ranking system (red for high impact/low rank number, green for lower impact/high rank number).Reinventing Construction Higher Productivity · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
07
The slide uses a split-screen layout with a blue background on the left and a construction site photo on the right.Reinventing Construction Higher Productivity · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
08
The chart uses a waterfall structure to show additive impact of seven enablers, leading to a total potential improvement compared to the economy-wide productivity gap.Reinventing Construction Higher Productivity · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
09
The slide uses a visual juxtaposition to frame the shift from site-based construction to industrial manufacturing.Reinventing Construction Higher Productivity · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
10
The slide uses a sequence of images to illustrate a construction timeline.Reinventing Construction Higher Productivity · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
11
The slide uses a McKinsey & Company branding style with a high-quality construction site photo.Reinventing Construction Higher Productivity · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
12
The R-squared value of 0.16 indicates a very weak correlation, suggesting that productivity is not the sole driver of profitability in this sector.Reinventing Construction Higher Productivity · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
13
The slide uses a two-column list format to contrast the roles of government as policymakers versus owners.Reinventing Construction Higher Productivity · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
14
Reinventing Construction Higher ProductivityReinventing Construction Higher Productivity · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
01
Technology Mineral CriticalityTechnology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
02
The diagram uses a nested box structure to show how Technology and Financing are positioned within the broader context of Demand, Supply, and Political/Responsibility factors.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
03
Technology Mineral CriticalityTechnology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
04
The slide uses two line charts to show production trends indexed to 1980, highlighting growth rates before and after the 1991 technology inflection point.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
05
The slide uses a map-based layout to present regional data tables, with a list of five key socio-economic drivers on the left.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
06
The chart uses a scatter plot approach on a 2x2 grid. The legend indicates 'Most important driver' categories.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
07
The data represents commodity lifetimes based on current economically viable reserves.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
08
The slide contrasts the geographic distribution of existing mines with the concentration of exploration capital.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
09
The slide uses a combination of a line chart for revenue and a stacked bar chart for investment components (Capex, Asset M&A, Corporate M&A).Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
10
The slide uses a structured table format to compare strategic options for capacity expansion.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
11
Technology Mineral CriticalityTechnology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
12
The slide uses a line chart for historical mining productivity and a bar chart for cross-industry OEE comparison.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
13
The matrix uses color-coded dots to indicate the scope of commodity applicability (single, group, or most).Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
14
The slide uses a 'Situation vs Impact' framework to demonstrate the value of the 'McKinsey Rapid Yield Boost' approach.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
15
The chart is a waterfall-style representation of cumulative impact.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
16
Technology Mineral CriticalityTechnology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Jobs To Be Done1 hit
17
Technology Mineral CriticalityTechnology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Jobs To Be Done1 hit
18
Includes specific assumptions about Grasberg and Escondida mines in the footer.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Jobs To Be Done1 hit
19
The slide uses dual line charts to illustrate demand growth, with callout bubbles indicating the scale of impact relative to current demand and mine output.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Jobs To Be Done1 hit
20
The slide uses a custom legend for likelihood (pie charts) and price impact (arrows).Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Jobs To Be Done1 hit
21
Technology Mineral CriticalityTechnology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
22
The chart uses an indexed scale (2000=100) to compare growth rates across three different commodities.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
23
The slide uses a red dashed box to highlight the period of significant cost adjustment around 2015.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
24
The slide uses a table-like structure to map specific technologies to quantitative outcomes and a descriptive case study for remote operations.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
25
The chart is a waterfall-style visualization showing a demand range and a supply figure with a gap.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
26
The slide uses a comparative table structure with embedded bar charts to visualize the impact of different scrap intensity scenarios.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit