Corpus coverage

319,975 slides

319,974 are described (100%), so the treemap can explain the corpus instead of just counting files.

Total slides
319,975
Described
319,974
Pending
1

Slide type composition

dynamicclickable
Slide type

Showing 319,974 described slides — 100.0% of 319,975 rendered pages

Tile area is proportional to slide count. Click a category to open its subtype map.

all document kinds · all orientations

Slide collection

134,221-134,280 of 319,975

filter-aware
06
Burger King Worldwide Holdings (BKW)Burger King Worldwide Holdings (BKW) · Justice Holdings Ltd.
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Why Now1 hit
07
Burger King Worldwide Holdings (BKW)Burger King Worldwide Holdings (BKW) · Justice Holdings Ltd.
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Why Now1 hit
08
Includes valuation metrics derived from a specific transaction (Justice).Burger King Worldwide Holdings (BKW) · Justice Holdings Ltd.
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Why Now1 hit
09
The slide highlights management instability (13 CEOs in 25 years) contrasted with the brand's resilience.Burger King Worldwide Holdings (BKW) · Justice Holdings Ltd.
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Why Now1 hit
01
Slide 1
Canadian Pacific Railway (CP)Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
02
Canadian Pacific Railway (CP)Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
03
Canadian Pacific Railway (CP)Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
04
Canadian Pacific Railway (CP)Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
05
The slide uses a logo grid to establish credibility via past activist campaigns.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
06
The slide uses a timeline-annotated line chart to illustrate the impact of activist intervention on stock price.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
07
Uses a rhetorical question to frame the proxy contest as a simple choice between two candidates.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
08
The slide uses a rhetorical question to simplify the complex proxy contest into a binary choice of leadership.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
09
Canadian Pacific Railway (CP)Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
10
Canadian Pacific Railway (CP)Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
11
Canadian Pacific Railway (CP)Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
12
Canadian Pacific Railway (CP)Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
13
Uses a contrast frame to preemptively address potential shareholder fears regarding a change of control.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
14
Canadian Pacific Railway (CP)Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
15
The slide uses a comparison of operational size vs. valuation to argue for an activist investment thesis.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The MonsterLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
16
Canadian Pacific Railway (CP)Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The MonsterLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
17
Canadian Pacific Railway (CP)Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The MonsterLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
18
The slide uses a red circle to highlight the negative 18% return for CP, emphasizing the poor performance.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The MonsterLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
19
The slide uses color-coded ellipses to group rankings and an arrow to denote a specific industry event (U.S. rails reset legacy contracts).Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The MonsterLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
20
The chart highlights a performance gap that persisted even after the appointment of a new CEO in 2006.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The MonsterLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
21
Includes a callout box preemptively addressing the 'longer haul' argument for lower pricing.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The CallLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
22
The slide uses a regression line to show that CP (circled) is performing as expected given its haul length, preempting arguments about poor pricing power.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The CallLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
23
The slide uses a causal chain at the bottom to suggest that operational efficiency leads to better service, which in turn drives volume and pricing.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The CallLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
24
The slide uses a callout box to emphasize a specific 200bps loss metric.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The CallLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
25
The chart uses a vertical dashed line to mark the appointment of Fred Green as CEO in 2006, correlating with a sharp increase in the cost disadvantage.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The CallLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
26
The chart uses a grouped bar structure to contrast CP's poor performance against CN's efficiency.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The CallLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
27
The slide uses a regression line to show the expected cost-to-haul relationship and uses an arrow to indicate CP's target performance.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The CallLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
28
The slide uses a 'before-after' comparison of asset utilization metrics between 2005 and 2010 to highlight operational inefficiency.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The CallLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
29
Uses a process-style flow to show the progression from a problem to expert testimony to a contradictory management action.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The CallLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
30
The chart uses a vertical dashed line at 2005 to mark a transition or specific event.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The CallLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
31
Vertical dashed line at 2005 likely indicates a management change or strategic pivot point.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Call1 hit
32
The chart includes a dashed line showing CP's performance adjusted for CN's CapEx levels, indicating overstated margins.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Call1 hit
33
The chart uses a waterfall structure to show how cash from operations is eroded by various outflows.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Call1 hit
34
The slide uses a comparative framework to illustrate a competitive disadvantage for Canadian Pacific.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Call1 hit
35
The slide uses a list-based critique format to dismantle a past management decision.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Call1 hit
36
The slide uses a causal chain framework to link operational failures to shareholder dilution.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Call1 hit
37
Canadian Pacific Railway (CP)Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Call1 hit
38
Canadian Pacific Railway (CP)Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Call1 hit
39
The chart highlights a performance gap between two entities (CP and CN) regarding asset utilization.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Call1 hit
40
The chart highlights operational inefficiency of CP relative to CN.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Call1 hit
41
The 23% figure represents the gap between CP and CN performance.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
42
The chart uses a red bar for CP and a grey bar for CN to emphasize the difference.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
43
The chart highlights CP's higher fuel consumption relative to CN.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
44
The slide uses a red bar for CP to emphasize poor performance relative to the grey bar for CN.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
45
The 29% figure represents the percentage difference relative to the lower value (CN).Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
46
The 80% figure represents the percentage difference relative to the lower value (CN).Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
47
The slide uses a red bar for CP to emphasize the negative performance gap relative to CN.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
48
The slide uses a direct comparison to highlight a competitive disadvantage.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
49
The chart uses coefficient of variation as a proxy for reliability.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
50
Canadian Pacific Railway (CP)Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
51
The slide uses a hub-and-spoke circular flow diagram to represent a 'vicious cycle'.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
52
Canadian Pacific Railway (CP)Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
53
The slide uses a list format to systematically undermine the credibility of the current management's strategic plan.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
54
Uses a before-after comparison to highlight inconsistency in management's strategic narrative.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
55
The slide uses a chevron-based table layout to contrast historical data with future targets.Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
56
The slide uses a waterfall chart to decompose the change in operating ratio. It includes red annotations to highlight specific areas of concern (volumes and productivity).Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) · William Ackman
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit