anlak storytelling
All kinds
Document kinds
Loading document kinds...

Primary corpus lens for browsing and insights. Selection lives in the URL.

All formats
Orientation
Loading formats...

Landscape, portrait, square, or unknown document geometry.

Unlock
slides · global inventory

All filtered slides

Global slide inventory for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.

Search Insights JSON Unlock
Corpus coverage

319,975 slides

319,974 are described (100%), so the treemap can explain the corpus instead of just counting files.

Total slides
319,975
Described
319,974
Pending
1

Slide type composition

dynamicclickable
Slide type

Showing 319,974 described slides — 100.0% of 319,975 rendered pages

+Context & problem43,76713.7% · 6,592 docs+Data & charts72,62022.7% · 8,666 docs+Meta & navigation45,93614.4% · 9,739 docs+Recommend & act67,04121.0% · 9,324 docs+Cases & evidence31,2569.8% · 6,067 docs+Frameworks2,1230.7% · 1,232 docs+Appendix35,68211.2% · 6,614 docs+Other21,5496.7% · 5,566 docs

Tile area is proportional to slide count. Click a category to open its subtype map.

all document kinds · all orientations
18 30 60

Slide collection

120,121-120,180 of 319,975

filter-aware
04
The slide argues that Aurora's scaling challenges are fundamental to its ODD-based approach, contrasting it with Waymo's denser urban model.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
05
This is a research note page from a short-seller report criticizing Aurora Innovation's business model and TAM claims.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
06
The slide uses a narrative structure to expose contradictions in Aurora's business model, specifically regarding cost, infrastructure, and partner alignment.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
07
The slide provides a financial snapshot of Aurora Innovation and transitions into a technical history of autonomous vehicle software stacks.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
08
The slide uses a process diagram to illustrate the flow from sensors to actuators in autonomous vehicles.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
09
This is a text-heavy research note page from Kerrisdale Capital. It critiques the 'modular-architecture' paradigm used by companies like Waymo.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
10
Includes a quote from an industry expert regarding the nature of autonomous driving development.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
11
The slide uses a quote from Aurora's CEO to frame their strategy as a 'quagmire' compared to the industry trend toward end-to-end models.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
12
The slide discusses the 'alignment challenge' in autonomous driving and provides a chronological breakdown of Waymo's city-by-city rollout.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
13
The text highlights discrepancies between Aurora's public claims and actual testing/deployment footprint in Texas.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
14
The slide uses a map to contextualize Aurora's operational footprint in Texas, supporting a thesis about the transferability of autonomous driving capabilities across similar freeway conditions.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
15
The slide uses a narrative structure to contrast Aurora's 'self-similarity' highway argument with the slow pace of actual lane expansion.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
16
The map illustrates the limited scope of Aurora's 'Driverless Operations' relative to the total US interstate system.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
17
Includes a quote from a former Aurora engineer regarding the complexity of mapping warehouse endpoints.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
18
This is a text-heavy research note slide from Kerrisdale Capital, acting as a rebuttal to Aurora's management claims.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
19
The slide uses a map to highlight the limited operational area of Aurora's trucks, contrasting this with the company's broader claims.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
20
Includes a quoted excerpt from Sterling Anderson (Aurora Investor Day 2024) followed by a critical analysis of the company's partnership strategy.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
21
The slide provides context for a critique of Aurora's cost-saving projections by comparing industry-wide ATRI data against specific dry van truck estimates.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
22
The slide uses a cost-comparison table to challenge Aurora's economic assumptions, specifically regarding the 'first and last mile' costs.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
23
The chart shows a 12-year range of the Intermodal Savings Index with specific lines for 2022, 2023, 2024, and 2025.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
24
Includes detailed footnotes explaining the assumptions behind the autonomous trucking constraints (CVSA inspections and terminal queuing).Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
25
The chart illustrates the impact of HOS (Hours of Service) limits on OTR trucking efficiency, showing 'kinks' at 750-mile intervals.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
26
Includes a footnote detailing the factors influencing drayage costs (wait times, terminal fees).Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
27
The table demonstrates that autonomous trucking struggles to compete with manned OTR trucking due to the fixed $1000 drayage cost, especially on shorter routes.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
28
The chart illustrates the cost crossover point between manned and autonomous delivery models.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
29
The chart shows a dual-axis representation of autonomous fee per mile vs. trip length and autonomous driver proportion of total cost.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
30
The slide uses a bottom-up calculation to challenge Aurora's TAM claims by applying load-weight assumptions to FHWA ton-mile data.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
31
Includes a direct quote from Aurora CEO Chris Urmson regarding hardware costs.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
32
The slide uses a narrative structure to dismantle the company's claims about hardware costs and the economic viability of their per-mile fee model.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
33
The slide uses anecdotal evidence from industry executives (Continental, PACCAR) to challenge Aurora's business model and technical readiness.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
34
The slide uses quotes from industry executives to debunk the idea that autonomous trucks will be cost-neutral or cheaper.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
35
The slide uses a transcript excerpt to argue that autonomous trucking requires significant hardware redundancy and maintenance infrastructure, contradicting the 'software-only' business model narrative.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
36
This is a text-heavy research note page from Kerrisdale Capital. It uses a logical, argumentative structure to dismantle specific claims made by Aurora.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
37
The slide uses a narrative structure to contrast Aurora's past stated goals with current operational realities and financial requirements.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
38
The slide uses a narrative-heavy structure to debunk Aurora's operational and financial projections.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
39
The slide uses map-based evidence to argue that Aurora's terminals are strategically located near major FedEx hubs, despite Aurora's stated focus on long-haul.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
40
This slide is part of a short-seller research report by Kerrisdale Capital, focusing on exposing flaws in Aurora's economic assumptions.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
41
This is a research note page from Kerrisdale Capital, focusing on the competitive landscape and economic viability of Aurora's autonomous trucking strategy.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
42
This slide serves as a bearish argument against Aurora's valuation by comparing it to leaner competitors and questioning the total addressable market size.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
43
Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR)Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
44
Page 44 of the deck.Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
45
Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR)Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
01
Slide 1
The slide serves as the cover/introductory summary for a short research report.Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
02
Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG)Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
03
The slide uses a strong argumentative tone to expose perceived dishonesty in competitor marketing claims regarding TCO.Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
04
The slide uses a table to contrast TCO models and then provides a narrative argument against the 'pro-flash' camp's claims regarding HDD performance limitations in AI applications.Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller 1 hit
05
This is a research note page from Kerrisdale Capital criticizing Pure Storage (PSTG).Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller Beat · Villain CritiqueLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
06
This is a text-heavy research note page from Kerrisdale Capital criticizing Pure Storage.Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller Beat · Villain CritiqueLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
07
The slide uses a short-thesis framework, contrasting Pure's performance with NetApp's.Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller Beat · Villain CritiqueLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
08
Includes a financial table and a narrative summary of the company's history and architectural advantages.Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller Beat · Villain CritiqueLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
09
The slide uses a quote from a former AWS architect to undermine the company's strategic narrative.Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller Beat · Villain CritiqueLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
10
Includes two testimonial quotes from industry participants criticizing Pure Storage's TCO analysis.Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller Beat · Expose ContradictionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
11
The slide uses a visual comparison chart to illustrate Pure's TCO argument, which the author then proceeds to debunk.Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller Beat · Expose ContradictionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
12
The slide serves as a critical review of competitor research, specifically targeting TCO models for storage hardware.Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller Beat · Preempt RebuttalLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
13
This slide details the specific technical assumptions (erasure coding ratios, data reduction ratios, power duty cycles) used to challenge Solidigm and Pure Storage claims.Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller Beat · Preempt RebuttalLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
14
This slide serves as a rebuttal to Solidigm's analysis, specifically challenging their assumptions on HDD/SSD reliability and cost-per-TB.Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller Beat · Preempt RebuttalLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
15
This slide serves as a detailed rebuttal of specific financial assumptions made by a competitor or target company.Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller Beat · Preempt RebuttalLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
16
The table compares three storage configurations across technical and financial dimensions to derive a cost multiple relative to HDDs.Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller Beat · Preempt RebuttalLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
17
Includes a testimonial from an AI Architect at a leading hyperscaler.Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller Beat · Preempt RebuttalLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
18
Includes a testimonial from a data storage product manager at a leading hyperscaler to support the argument.Pure Storage, Inc. (PSTG) · Kerrisdale Capital
Research note Short seller Beat · Preempt RebuttalLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit