slides · global inventory
Comparison Frame
Framework collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Matching slides 6,294
Current window 3,181-3,210
Pages 210
Rows per page 30
Framework
3,181-3,210 of 6,294
23
The slide uses a comparative list structure to evaluate tax implications for different deal structures.Goldman Sachs | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 26 slides · Goldman Sachs
Consulting deck Investment bank 1 hit
23
The slide uses a grouped bar chart format to compare valuation multiples across different retail segments.Perella Weinberg Partners | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 68 slides · Perella Weinberg Partners
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
45
The slide uses a grouped bar chart approach to compare Heat against specific peer segments.Perella Weinberg Partners | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 68 slides · Perella Weinberg Partners
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Golden Circle1 hit
46
The slide uses grouped bar charts to compare operating margins across six distinct peer categories.Perella Weinberg Partners | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 68 slides · Perella Weinberg Partners
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Golden Circle1 hit
48
Financial results for a stated year represent financials for the 12 month period ending January 31 of the following year.Perella Weinberg Partners | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 68 slides · Perella Weinberg Partners
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Golden Circle1 hit
53
The slide highlights the shift in market perception of 'Heat' from a high-growth company to a mature peer as performance metrics declined.Perella Weinberg Partners | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 68 slides · Perella Weinberg Partners
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
15
The slide uses a comparison table to justify a higher valuation target based on improved organic growth and EBIT margins.Pershing Square | Activist Presentation Deck | 45 slides · Pershing Square Capital Management
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · AgitateLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
18
The slide highlights that peers with lower emerging market exposure and weaker brand/category positioning are still achieving higher growth than P&G.Pershing Square | Activist Presentation Deck | 45 slides · Pershing Square Capital Management
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · AgitateLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
22
The slide highlights a performance gap between P&G's internal plan and industry benchmarks.Pershing Square | Activist Presentation Deck | 45 slides · Pershing Square Capital Management
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · SolutionLoop · Mece Breakdown1 hit
26
The slide uses a 'Pershing View' to project peer benchmark performance onto P&G's scale.Pershing Square | Activist Presentation Deck | 45 slides · Pershing Square Capital Management
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · SolutionLoop · Mece Breakdown1 hit
28
The slide includes a specific note regarding the methodology for adjusting Colgate's gross margin to ensure comparability with P&G.Pershing Square | Activist Presentation Deck | 45 slides · Pershing Square Capital Management
Conference presentation Activist investor 1 hit
35
Pershing Square | Activist Presentation Deck | 45 slidesPershing Square | Activist Presentation Deck | 45 slides · Pershing Square Capital Management
Conference presentation Activist investor 1 hit
37
The slide uses a grouped bar chart to compare P&G vs Peer Average over 4 quarters, with a summary table of the performance gap.Pershing Square | Activist Presentation Deck | 45 slides · Pershing Square Capital Management
Conference presentation Activist investor 1 hit
44
The chart highlights P&G's lower valuation relative to competitors like Church & Dwight, Clorox, Colgate, Kimberly-Clark, L'Oréal, and Unilever.Pershing Square | Activist Presentation Deck | 45 slides · Pershing Square Capital Management
Conference presentation Activist investor 1 hit
20
Uses a comparison table to contrast a profitable peer with the target company's loss-making segments.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)1 hit
21
Uses CNET as a precedent for profitability in display-heavy business models.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
22
The slide uses a red circle annotation to emphasize the $1.1B expense figure.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
54
Uses an 'Independent Peer Group' to contrast with AOL's existing peer group.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
58
Highlights the risk of 'cherry-picking' larger peers to inflate compensation.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
64
The slide highlights that AOL's peer group selection is biased towards larger companies, failing standard proxy advisor guidelines.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
65
Uses red circles to highlight the extreme market cap multiples.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
66
The slide uses a table to contrast AOL's metrics with a peer group mean/median, highlighting that the new group is more representative.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
67
The chart uses a blue dashed box to highlight the target range for peer selection.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
68
The slide uses a green border to highlight the 'Independent Peer Group' row as the compliant option.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
69
Uses a red box to highlight the misalignment of AOL's performance metrics vs. compensation.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
70
The slide uses a red dashed line to indicate the peer group median of 1.0%.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
72
The slide uses a specific 'Independent Peer Group' to expose the discrepancy in AOL's compensation benchmarking.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 96 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
04
The slide uses a classic 'problem-solution-credibility' structure common in activist investor presentations.Trian Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 16 slides · Trian Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · ProblemLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
10
Slide 9 of an activist deck, likely targeting Danone.Trian Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 16 slides · Trian Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Market Size1 hit
14
Uses historical market sentiment (2009) as a precedent for current valuation opportunity.Trian Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 16 slides · Trian Partners
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit