Corpus coverage

319,975 slides

319,974 are described (100%), so the treemap can explain the corpus instead of just counting files.

Total slides
319,975
Described
319,974
Pending
1

Slide type composition

dynamicclickable
Slide type

Showing 319,974 described slides — 100.0% of 319,975 rendered pages

Tile area is proportional to slide count. Click a category to open its subtype map.

all document kinds · all orientations

Slide collection

309,601-309,630 of 319,975

filter-aware
51
Includes LTM and calendarized multiples for 2012 and 2013.28 IBD presentation 2013 Asiainfo Linkage Inc Goldman Sachs 1 · 28-ibd-presentation-2013-asiainfo-linkage-inc-goldman-sachs-1
Deck Investment bank 1 hit
52
Includes a highlighted callout box noting the median EV/EBITDA multiple after the financial crisis.28 IBD presentation 2013 Asiainfo Linkage Inc Goldman Sachs 1 · 28-ibd-presentation-2013-asiainfo-linkage-inc-goldman-sachs-1
Deck Investment bank 1 hit
53
28 IBD presentation 2013 Asiainfo Linkage Inc Goldman Sachs 128 IBD presentation 2013 Asiainfo Linkage Inc Goldman Sachs 1 · 28-ibd-presentation-2013-asiainfo-linkage-inc-goldman-sachs-1
Deck Investment bank 1 hit
54
Includes sensitivity analysis tables for WACC based on D/(D+E) and Cost of Equity.28 IBD presentation 2013 Asiainfo Linkage Inc Goldman Sachs 1 · 28-ibd-presentation-2013-asiainfo-linkage-inc-goldman-sachs-1
Deck Investment bank 1 hit
55
Data as of March 16, 2012. Note: No debt on any of Aurora's comps, equity beta is the unlevered Beta for comps.28 IBD presentation 2013 Asiainfo Linkage Inc Goldman Sachs 1 · 28-ibd-presentation-2013-asiainfo-linkage-inc-goldman-sachs-1
Deck Investment bank 1 hit
56
28 IBD presentation 2013 Asiainfo Linkage Inc Goldman Sachs 128 IBD presentation 2013 Asiainfo Linkage Inc Goldman Sachs 1 · 28-ibd-presentation-2013-asiainfo-linkage-inc-goldman-sachs-1
Deck Investment bank 1 hit
57
28 IBD presentation 2013 Asiainfo Linkage Inc Goldman Sachs 128 IBD presentation 2013 Asiainfo Linkage Inc Goldman Sachs 1 · 28-ibd-presentation-2013-asiainfo-linkage-inc-goldman-sachs-1
Deck Investment bank 1 hit
58
The slide presents a scenario analysis framework for financial modeling.28 IBD presentation 2013 Asiainfo Linkage Inc Goldman Sachs 1 · 28-ibd-presentation-2013-asiainfo-linkage-inc-goldman-sachs-1
Deck Investment bank 1 hit
59
Includes CAGR metrics and margin/growth percentages for each financial metric.28 IBD presentation 2013 Asiainfo Linkage Inc Goldman Sachs 1 · 28-ibd-presentation-2013-asiainfo-linkage-inc-goldman-sachs-1
Deck Investment bank 1 hit
60
Includes CAGR metrics and margin/growth percentages for each financial metric.28 IBD presentation 2013 Asiainfo Linkage Inc Goldman Sachs 1 · 28-ibd-presentation-2013-asiainfo-linkage-inc-goldman-sachs-1
Deck Investment bank 1 hit
61
Includes CAGR metrics and margin/growth percentages for each financial metric.28 IBD presentation 2013 Asiainfo Linkage Inc Goldman Sachs 1 · 28-ibd-presentation-2013-asiainfo-linkage-inc-goldman-sachs-1
Deck Investment bank 1 hit
62
The table displays historical 2011 data alongside projections for 2012-2016, including CAGR calculations.28 IBD presentation 2013 Asiainfo Linkage Inc Goldman Sachs 1 · 28-ibd-presentation-2013-asiainfo-linkage-inc-goldman-sachs-1
Deck Investment bank 1 hit
63
Includes footnotes regarding share counts and par value.28 IBD presentation 2013 Asiainfo Linkage Inc Goldman Sachs 1 · 28-ibd-presentation-2013-asiainfo-linkage-inc-goldman-sachs-1
Deck Investment bank 1 hit
01
Slide 1
28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
02
Uses a 'What this work IS vs IS NOT' comparison framework to manage stakeholder expectations.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
03
The diagram is a circular Venn-like representation of three interconnected priorities.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
04
28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
05
28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
06
The chart uses a waterfall structure to decompose total per-pupil spending into specific categories like central office, SPED, and school-level support.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
07
The slide uses a numbered list format to categorize four distinct strategic pillars for financial and operational improvement.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
08
The chart uses a combination of a bar chart for school programs and a line chart for student population to illustrate the mismatch.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
09
The chart is a descending bar chart representing school capacity.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
10
The chart is a sorted bar chart (waterfall-like) showing individual school utilization rates.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
11
The slide uses a horizontal bar chart to compare Boston against 17 other districts, with a vertical line indicating the peer average of 16.3.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
12
The slide uses external benchmarking to validate a financial hypothesis.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
13
The slide uses a table to illustrate the financial impact of school consolidation, showing prior costs versus expected post-consolidation costs.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
14
28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
15
28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
16
The slide uses a hierarchical tree diagram to decompose the $265m total SPED spending.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations 1 hit
17
The chart displays a long list of schools on the y-axis with corresponding classification percentages on the x-axis.28 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Draft · 28-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-draft
Deck Investor relations 1 hit