anlak storytelling
All kinds
Document kinds
Loading document kinds...

Primary corpus lens for browsing and insights. Selection lives in the URL.

All formats
Orientation
Loading formats...

Landscape, portrait, square, or unknown document geometry.

Unlock
slides · global inventory

Table

Component collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.

Search Insights JSON Unlock
Matching slides 60,557
Current window 27,871-27,900
Pages 2,019
Rows per page 30
Component: Tableclear collectionreset all
18 30 60

Component

27,871-27,900 of 60,557

filter-aware
06
The slide uses checkmarks and crosses to highlight the perceived deficiencies of a Darden REIT compared to industry benchmarks.Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI) · Darden
Regulatory filing Activist investor Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
07
The slide uses a comparison framework to systematically dismantle the opponent's valuation model.Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI) · Darden
Regulatory filing Activist investor Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
08
The slide uses a comparative structure to refute Starboard's claims regarding REIT valuation and feasibility.Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI) · Darden
Regulatory filing Activist investor Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
09
The slide uses a three-column structure to systematically dismantle the opponent's valuation argument.Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI) · Darden
Regulatory filing Activist investor Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
10
The slide uses a red dashed box to highlight specific rows where the Board's assumptions differ from Starboard's, specifically EBITDA multiple and total net value change.Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI) · Darden
Regulatory filing Activist investor Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Mece Breakdown1 hit
11
The slide uses a table structure to present a diagnostic view of why further real estate divestitures are complex or unfavorable.Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI) · Darden
Regulatory filing Activist investor Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Mece Breakdown1 hit
12
The slide uses a structured list format to present arguments against a spin-off or separation.Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI) · Darden
Regulatory filing Activist investor Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Mece Breakdown1 hit
18
The slide uses a rhetorical question as an action title to challenge management's narrative.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
21
The slide uses a 'villain' framing for the Phillips Today column, using red text and 'x' icons to highlight negative performance metrics.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
27
Uses a 'Promises vs. Reality' framework to highlight management failure.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution1 hit
31
Uses a 'best practice' framework to contrast two companies. Includes a footer section with market sentiment quotes.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution1 hit
33
Uses a waterfall chart to show net divestitures and a table to detail asset dispositions.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution1 hit
34
The slide uses a red 'shortfalls' column to emphasize negative performance gaps.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution1 hit
38
The slide uses a checkmark matrix to demonstrate strategic alignment across multiple potential acquirers.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
39
The slide uses a comparative framework to suggest a path for Phillips 66 based on Marathon's historical success.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
41
The slide uses a screenshot of a previous Elliott presentation as evidence of their original thesis, then contrasts it with a table of actual results.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
45
Includes detailed footnotes regarding adjustments for specific companies like PSX, SUN, OKE, TRGP, and DOW.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
46
The table uses a 6.6x EBITDA multiple as a baseline for valuation, with specific adjustments for asset sales and debt paydowns.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
18
The slide uses a rhetorical question as an action title to challenge management's narrative.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
21
The slide uses a 'villain' framing by highlighting the 'Phillips Today' column with red 'X' marks to emphasize negative performance metrics.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
27
Uses a 'Promises vs. Reality' framework to highlight management credibility issues.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
30
Uses a side-by-side comparison to frame Suncor as the 'High-Performing Company' and Phillips 66 as the 'Underperforming Company'.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
31
Uses a 'best practice' framework to contrast two companies; includes a section of analyst quotes to validate Suncor's success.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
33
Uses a waterfall chart to illustrate the net impact of divestitures vs acquisitions.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
34
The slide uses a red-themed 'shortfalls' column to emphasize negative performance gaps.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate1 hit
38
The slide uses a checkmark matrix to demonstrate strategic alignment across multiple criteria.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · SolutionLoop · Quick Win Big Bet1 hit
39
The slide uses a comparison framework to validate the proposed strategy by citing a successful precedent (Marathon).Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · SolutionLoop · Quick Win Big Bet1 hit
41
The slide uses a 'before-after' framing to contrast past projections with current reality, highlighting the success of the activist campaign.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution1 hit
45
Includes footnotes detailing specific adjustments for PSX, SUN, OKE, TRGP, and DOW.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
46
Includes detailed footnotes explaining specific adjustments for debt, cash, and asset divestitures.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit