slides · global inventory
Metric
Component collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Matching slides 79,264
Current window 27,481-27,510
Pages 2,643
Rows per page 30
Component
27,481-27,510 of 79,264
03
The slide uses a bar chart format to compare three distinct metrics across two regions.European Banking Summit 2018 · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
04
The chart uses country flags as visual identifiers and segments financial depth into Equity, FI bonds, Non-FI bonds, and Securitisation.European Banking Summit 2018 · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
05
The chart uses a broken axis to skip ranks 6-9 and 11-20, focusing on specific cities of interest.European Banking Summit 2018 · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
06
Data shows US banks growing significantly faster than EU banks in both market cap and deal volume.European Banking Summit 2018 · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
07
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to contrast European bank claims with other regions over a 9-year period.European Banking Summit 2018 · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
08
EU players are highlighted with a light blue background.European Banking Summit 2018 · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
09
McKinsey & Company branding present.European Banking Summit 2018 · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Quick Win Big Bet1 hit
03
Includes an inset chart specifically for FDI flows.Investment Industrial Policy Future · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · AttentionLoop · Pattern Hunter1 hit
04
The chart uses a relative index based on peak values for each category.Investment Industrial Policy Future · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · AttentionLoop · Pattern Hunter1 hit
11
The slide uses a waterfall-style visualization to show individual contributions to a total GDP impact.Investment Industrial Policy Future · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Golden Circle1 hit
12
The chart uses a broken axis for the x-axis (GDP per capita) between 80 and 140.Investment Industrial Policy Future · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Golden Circle1 hit
13
Investment Industrial Policy FutureInvestment Industrial Policy Future · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Golden Circle1 hit
17
Contains four distinct charts: two line charts for FDI/M&A trends, one stacked bar chart for economic sentiment, and one horizontal bar chart for economic risks.Investment Industrial Policy Future · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Action1 hit
18
The slide contrasts physical trade dominance (China/US/Germany) with digital dominance (US-centric content production).Investment Industrial Policy Future · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Action1 hit
19
The slide uses donut charts to visualize the percentage share of global flows across different country groupings.Investment Industrial Policy Future · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Action1 hit
20
The chart uses a horizontal bar format to visualize the scale of digital platforms relative to nation-states.Investment Industrial Policy Future · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Action1 hit
12
The R-squared value of 0.16 indicates a very weak correlation, suggesting that productivity is not the sole driver of profitability in this sector.Reinventing Construction Higher Productivity · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
04
The slide uses two line charts to show production trends indexed to 1980, highlighting growth rates before and after the 1991 technology inflection point.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
05
The slide uses a map-based layout to present regional data tables, with a list of five key socio-economic drivers on the left.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
07
The data represents commodity lifetimes based on current economically viable reserves.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
08
The slide contrasts the geographic distribution of existing mines with the concentration of exploration capital.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
09
The slide uses a combination of a line chart for revenue and a stacked bar chart for investment components (Capex, Asset M&A, Corporate M&A).Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
12
The slide uses a line chart for historical mining productivity and a bar chart for cross-industry OEE comparison.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
14
The slide uses a 'Situation vs Impact' framework to demonstrate the value of the 'McKinsey Rapid Yield Boost' approach.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
15
The chart is a waterfall-style representation of cumulative impact.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
18
Includes specific assumptions about Grasberg and Escondida mines in the footer.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Jobs To Be Done1 hit
19
The slide uses dual line charts to illustrate demand growth, with callout bubbles indicating the scale of impact relative to current demand and mine output.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Jobs To Be Done1 hit
22
The chart uses an indexed scale (2000=100) to compare growth rates across three different commodities.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
25
The chart is a waterfall-style visualization showing a demand range and a supply figure with a gap.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
26
The slide uses a comparative table structure with embedded bar charts to visualize the impact of different scrap intensity scenarios.Technology Mineral Criticality · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit