Matching slides 303,834
Current window 26,491-26,520
Pages 10,128
Rows per page 30
Component: Titleclear collectionreset all

Component

26,491-26,520 of 303,834

filter-aware
29
Uses a timeline-style progression to show the shift in margin targets.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose ContradictionLoop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
31
Uses a timeline-style flow to show the 'miss' and the subsequent lowering of expectations.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose ContradictionLoop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
36
The slide uses a numbered list format to present a series of grievances against the company's leadership.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
44
Uses a contrast-pairs framework to highlight the gap between industry peers and the target company.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Propose SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
45
Uses a combination of longitudinal growth analysis and cross-sectional peer benchmarking to highlight excessive compensation.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Propose SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
56
Uses red 'X' icons to denote negative practices.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Villain CritiqueLoop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
57
Uses a contrast-pairs framework to highlight the gap between stated intent and actual practice.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Villain CritiqueLoop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
64
The slide highlights a negative governance practice by contrasting Autodesk with its peers.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Villain CritiqueLoop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
66
The slide uses a numbered list format to highlight specific areas of concern, with one item (5) highlighted in a different color to emphasize the severity of the audit committee investigation.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Executive SummaryLoop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
80
The slide uses a numbered list format to present a series of grievances against the current leadership.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Executive SummaryLoop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
81
The slide uses a bar chart to visualize acquisition spend and a callout box to emphasize the cumulative total.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
83
Uses a waterfall chart to illustrate the buildup of total cash available for buybacks through FY2027.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
03
The slide uses a three-column layout to segment the portfolio. The bottom callout emphasizes the societal impact.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor 2 hits
05
The slide uses a dual-axis chart to visually suggest a causal link between vaccine rollout and reduced mortality.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor 2 hits
10
The slide uses a structured list of four key problem areas (A, B, C, D) followed by a summary of the financial impact.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
12
The chart highlights Pfizer's position relative to a peer median of 46 drugs.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
13
The slide uses external validation to support a thesis about the company's strategic positioning.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
14
This slide is part of an activist investor presentation (Starboard Value) intended to expose management's past claims against current performance or strategy.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
16
The slide uses a historical Pfizer graphic to frame a critique of R&D productivity.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
17
The slide uses a table to demonstrate historical management commitments to specific R&D milestones.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
19
The slide uses a screenshot of a Pfizer investor presentation to frame the argument that management failed to deliver on its own stated goals.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
20
The slide uses a callout to emphasize the gap between actual performance and the blockbuster threshold, and includes a quote from a 10-K filing to support the divestment claim.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
25
The slide uses a direct quote/excerpt from a primary source to validate the claim of continued success.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
26
The slide uses a series of callout boxes to present external validation of competitive pressure.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
31
The slide uses a 'preempt_rebuttal' or 'expose_contradiction' strategy by showing original company claims and implying failure through the context of the activist's critique.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
03
The slide uses a 'callback' technique to link current investment opportunities to past analysis.Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Situation & Context2 hits
06
The chart highlights the 'Rule of 50' metric, showing CRM's improvement compared to a prior period.Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Pattern Hunter2 hits
07
The slide uses a stock performance chart to validate the thesis that strategic changes have driven shareholder value.Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Evidence & Proof2 hits
10
Uses waterfall-style bridge charts to show historical improvement and remaining gap to peer median.Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
12
The chart uses a 'Rule of 50' framework, which is a common SaaS performance benchmark. It includes a 'PF CRM' (Pro Forma) bar to illustrate the target.Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Impact & Next Steps2 hits