slides · global inventory
Callout
Component collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Matching slides 96,741
Current window 26,491-26,520
Pages 3,225
Rows per page 30
Component
26,491-26,520 of 96,741
78
The table acts as a decision matrix for the 4 selected options.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
80
The slide is a continuation of a previous list, focusing on options 5 through 8.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
85
The slide outlines a specific implementation strategy (phased approach) to mitigate risks associated with a proposed policy option.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
87
Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011)Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
89
The slide discusses the asymmetry of risk in an outperformance-only incentive scheme compared to a symmetrical one.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
91
The slide uses a normal distribution curve to quantify financial risk/volatility.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
92
The chart illustrates the breakeven points (1.8% and 3.7%) for two scenarios of train operator contribution to NR performance.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
94
The slide compares two scenarios based on regional vs national level mechanisms. The data shows how volatility and correlation affect financial outcomes.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
96
The table uses a color-coded qualitative scale (+, 0, --, -) to compare Option 1 (symmetrical) and Option 2 (upside only).Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
100
Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011)Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
101
The slide uses a table to compare four scenarios (No sharing, Full sharing, TOC pax and sch 8 revenue shared only, TOC pax revenue shared only) across 'Before', 'After', and 'Change' metrics.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
105
The slide discusses the implications of including TOC performance in a sharing mechanism, specifically noting risks of gaming and the need for open-book accounting.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
106
The slide uses qualitative feedback from industry stakeholders to argue against a specific policy option.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
109
The slide discusses the mechanism of Clause 18.1 and provides a quantitative rationale for a 25% exposure model.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
111
L.E.K. consulting slide regarding rail industry cost and revenue sharing.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
116
The slide discusses the financial and operational disincentives for Network Rail to add capacity and suggests adjusting VTAC as a solution.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
117
VTAC stands for Variable Usage Charge (implied context). NR stands for Network Rail.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
120
The slide presents a specific strategic option (Option 8) derived from stakeholder feedback.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
121
Includes a testimonial/quote from a European train operator and a specific case example regarding South West Trains.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
122
The slide uses a vertical arrow diagram to represent increasing depth of commercial agreement.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
123
The slide highlights that these deals are currently focused on daily operations rather than long-term maintenance or capital expenditure.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
124
Focuses on the friction between train operators/Network Rail and regulators (DfT/ORR) regarding contractual flexibility.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
125
The slide uses a central arrow labeled 'Cultural change' to bridge the two approaches.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
127
The slide uses a 'carrot vs stick' metaphor to describe the incentive structure for stakeholder collaboration.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
130
The table uses a color-coded scoring system (red for negative, grey for neutral, green for positive) to evaluate options.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
131
Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011)Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
132
The table uses a traffic light system (green for checkmark, red for X) to indicate implementation status.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
137
Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011)Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
141
Includes quotes from KPMG (2008), Committee of Public Accounts (2010), and Tom Winsor (2004) to support the diagnosis of governance issues.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
142
The slide details the regulatory framework established by the Railways Act 2005 and the specific findings of the PR08 review regarding efficiency gaps.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit