slides · global inventory
Metric
Component collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Matching slides 79,264
Current window 22,921-22,950
Pages 2,643
Rows per page 30
Component
22,921-22,950 of 79,264
122
The slide uses a waterfall-style logic to show the distribution of FTE (årsværk) adjustments. Includes source attribution to BCG and Struensee & Co.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Segmentation Split1 hit
123
The chart displays FTE reductions across three categories: Operative, IT/Material, and Administrative, with a total column. Data is segmented by year and estimate level.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Segmentation Split1 hit
124
The chart shows negative values for 'Civile' and positive values for the other three categories, indicating a conversion or shift in roles.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Segmentation Split1 hit
125
The chart highlights that most reductions occur at middle management (M2xx) and leadership levels. Data is split into low and high estimates.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Segmentation Split1 hit
126
The chart compares current structure with two proposed scenarios (low span vs high span) across four job levels.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Segmentation Split1 hit
127
The chart compares current staffing levels against two proposed scenarios (low and high range) across four management levels.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Segmentation Split1 hit
128
The table breaks down budget reductions by department and category (operative, support/IT, administrative, and overlaps).Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Segmentation Split1 hit
129
The table breaks down budget impacts by department and category (operational, materiel/IT, administrative, and overlaps).Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Segmentation Split1 hit
130
The table displays financial and operational potential (Løn/ØD) across multiple organizational units. BCG/Struensee branding present.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
131
The table displays financial or resource potential values across multiple organizational units (VFK, Hæren, Søværnet, etc.) and specific initiatives (26-35).Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
132
The table breaks down financial potential (Løn, ØD, Anlæg) by specific organizational units and initiatives.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
133
The table displays 'Løn' (Salary) and 'ØD' (Operating Expenses) impacts for 25 initiatives across multiple organizational units.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
134
The table displays financial impact data across multiple organizational units. The rows represent specific initiatives, and columns represent organizational entities.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
135
The table includes rows for specific initiatives (36-45) and summary rows for overlaps and totals.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
137
Data source: Notat af 29. maj 2017 fra FMN.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
145
The slide uses a structured table format to outline the logistics reorganization initiative, including financial impact and operational considerations.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Build Up1 hit
146
The slide uses a structured table format to present a business case for a specific military procurement initiative.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Build Up1 hit
147
The slide uses a structured table format to present a business case/diagnosis for organizational optimization.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Build Up1 hit
155
The slide uses a funnel framework to visualize the filtering process of military capabilities.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Zoom In1 hit
160
The slide uses a 2x2 grid layout to present a four-step process.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Zoom In1 hit
164
Includes a footnote regarding Army capabilities and cost variations based on deployment duration.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
165
The table includes a legend for 'Basis for 2017' and detailed footnotes explaining the methodology and specific scenario constraints.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
166
The slide uses a scenario-based comparison framework to evaluate operational scaling options.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
167
The slide compares SAR (Search and Rescue) and TTT (Tactical Troop Transport) capabilities across five scenarios.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
168
The slide illustrates the 'lag' between cost reduction and cash/expenditure impact.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
169
The slide uses a scenario-based comparison framework to evaluate readiness levels (7, 30, 180, 360 days) against cost and operational constraints.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
170
The slide compares readiness scenarios (1-4) based on notice periods (7, 30, 180, 360 days) and their associated cost and operational impacts.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
171
The slide uses a table to compare four distinct operational scenarios for the Absalon-class ships, focusing on deployment days, crew requirements, and costs.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
172
The slide compares four scenarios for Challenger aircraft operations, focusing on VIP transport, general transport, NATO/INTOPS tasks, and Arctic presence.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
173
The slide compares operational scenarios based on mission days (farvandsovervågning) and associated costs.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit