slides · global inventory
Callout
Component collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Matching slides 96,741
Current window 21,961-21,990
Pages 3,225
Rows per page 30
Component
21,961-21,990 of 96,741
23
The slide uses a matrix structure to categorize 15 distinct initiatives across 5 sectors plus cross-sector initiatives.Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Golden Circle1 hit
24
The slide uses a structured approach to evaluate a regulatory initiative, balancing benefits and risks while listing technical requirements.Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Golden Circle1 hit
25
The slide uses a structured approach to evaluate a regulatory initiative, including a callout for an expert committee (WACC-udvalget).Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Golden Circle1 hit
26
The slide uses a structured approach to evaluate a policy initiative, contrasting pros/cons with implementation requirements.Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Golden Circle1 hit
27
Initiative 3 in a series.Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Golden Circle1 hit
29
The slide outlines the benefits, potential drawbacks, and regulatory prerequisites for corporatizing municipal utility services.Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Golden Circle1 hit
30
The slide uses a structured approach to evaluate a specific regulatory initiative.Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Golden Circle1 hit
31
The slide outlines the rationale, benefits, potential drawbacks, and regulatory prerequisites for this incentive mechanism.Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Golden Circle1 hit
32
Part of a series of initiatives (labeled '8').Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Golden Circle1 hit
33
The slide is part of a list of initiatives (labeled '9').Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Golden Circle1 hit
34
The slide uses a structured approach to evaluate the initiative, splitting it into benefits/drawbacks and implementation prerequisites.Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Golden Circle1 hit
35
The slide outlines the initiative, its pros/cons, and the prerequisites for effective regulation.Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Golden Circle1 hit
38
The slide uses a three-column structure: Characteristics, Barriers, and Initiatives.Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Golden Circle1 hit
39
Includes methodology notes on DEA/SFA models and sensitivity analysis regarding infrastructure factors.Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Golden Circle1 hit
40
The chart uses a waterfall structure to show the additive nature of different cooperation types towards the total sector potential.Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Golden Circle1 hit
41
The slide uses a map of Denmark to visualize company locations and regional statistics, supported by bar charts showing average distances and total number of potential collaborators.Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
42
The slide uses DEA and SFA benchmarking models to calculate efficiency scores and potential savings.Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
43
The chart uses a waterfall structure to show the additive potential of different cooperation types.Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
44
The slide uses a map of Denmark to visualize company locations and regional statistics, supported by bar charts showing distance and potential partners.Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
50
The slide uses a three-column structure to present sector characteristics, barriers, and initiatives, supported by a waterfall chart showing efficiency potential.Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
51
The slide uses a 'best-of-two' model (DEA and SFA) to calculate efficiency potential, excluding fuel costs and including heat loss value.Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
52
The chart breaks down potential savings into Service, Operations, and Investment collaboration, totaling 394 DKKm.Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
53
Includes a map of Denmark with regional statistics and two bar charts illustrating distance to nearest company and potential cooperation types.Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
55
The slide uses a table structure to compare strategic initiatives. Some rows span the entire width for cross-references to other pages.Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
58
The slide uses a three-column structure to present the current state, challenges, and potential solutions.Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
59
The slide uses DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) to calculate efficiency scores and potential savings.Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
60
The chart breaks down potential savings into CAPEX and OPEX components across different types of collaboration (service, operations, infrastructure).Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
61
Includes a map of Denmark with company locations, bar charts for distance and collaboration types, and regional statistics.Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
66
The slide uses a three-column structure to present the current state, challenges, and recommendations.Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
67
The slide compares efficiency gaps across three companies to derive a total sector potential.Forsyningssektorens Effektiviseringspotentiale · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit