anlak storytelling
All kinds
Document kinds
Loading document kinds...

Primary corpus lens for browsing and insights. Selection lives in the URL.

All formats
Orientation
Loading formats...

Landscape, portrait, square, or unknown document geometry.

Unlock
slides · global inventory

Table

Component collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.

Search Insights JSON Unlock
Matching slides 60,557
Current window 20,761-20,790
Pages 2,019
Rows per page 30
Component: Tableclear collectionreset all
18 30 60

Component

20,761-20,790 of 60,557

filter-aware
24
The table highlights a pattern of historical commitments for FY2023 and FY2026, with empty columns for actuals and consensus, suggesting a critique of target reliability.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose ContradictionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
25
The slide uses a bridge-style comparison to show how M&A activity adjusted the company's financial targets.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose ContradictionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
27
The table highlights a pattern of consistent financial guidance across multiple years.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose ContradictionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
28
Uses red 'X' icons to visually emphasize failure to meet targets.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose ContradictionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
33
The slide uses red dashed boxes and 'LOWERED' callouts to emphasize the negative trend in financial guidance.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose ContradictionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
34
The slide uses red text for actual/consensus figures that fall below or deviate from the historical targets, emphasizing the gap.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose ContradictionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
35
Uses red 'X' icons to visually emphasize missed targets.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Expose ContradictionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
47
The slide uses a 'bridge' style calculation to show how revenue growth and profit growth result in a 71% incremental margin.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Propose SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
48
The slide uses a 'Change' box to calculate the incremental margin (delta profit / delta revenue).Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Propose SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
49
The slide uses a 'Change' column to highlight the delta between FY2024 and FY2027E, framing the 36% incremental margin as a failure to improve profitability.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Propose SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
51
The slide uses a color-coded legend to distinguish between 'Design Software Peers' and 'Other Scaled Software Peers'.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Propose SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
52
Includes a table detailing consensus revenue, gross profit, operating income, and margins, alongside specific cost reduction targets.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Propose SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
58
The slide uses a table to show that targets for FY2023 remained largely static across multiple years of investor presentations.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Villain CritiqueLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
59
The slide uses a 'miss vs. investor day' column to highlight the delta between public commitments and internal compensation hurdles.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Villain CritiqueLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
60
The slide uses red 'X' marks to visually emphasize the failure to meet historical targets, contrasting them with high 'Comp Attainment' percentages.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Villain CritiqueLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
64
The slide highlights a negative governance practice by contrasting Autodesk with its peers.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Villain CritiqueLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
65
Uses a contrast-pair structure to highlight misalignment between management incentives and shareholder value.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Villain CritiqueLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
77
Uses a visual equation to show how the manipulated metrics feed into the 'Financial Goal Funding Multiplier', leading to higher payouts.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Executive SummaryLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
86
Includes a specific callout for cost savings (500bps S&M, 300bps G&A) and a projection of share repurchases.Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
03
The slide uses a three-column layout to segment the portfolio. The bottom callout emphasizes the societal impact.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor 1 hit
08
The chart uses a custom bridge structure to calculate total value lost.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor 1 hit
17
The slide uses a table to demonstrate historical management commitments to specific R&D milestones.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
18
The slide uses a screenshot of a Pfizer table to critique their 'Up to 15 in 5' program claims.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
19
The slide uses a screenshot of a Pfizer investor presentation to frame the argument that management failed to deliver on its own stated goals.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
47
The slide uses a bar chart to visualize the delta between historical transaction multiples and current market valuation multiples.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
52
The slide uses a red dashed box to isolate the 'COVID Benefit' period and another to highlight the summary statistics.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
54
The slide uses red 'X' marks to visually emphasize the failure to meet expectations.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
64
The slide uses a table from Pfizer's own Q1-2019 presentation to point out programs marked with 'X' (discontinued) or other delays, framing them as evidence of failure.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
68
The slide uses a waterfall bridge to argue that current management's projected revenue return (15%) is insufficient compared to the target (38%).Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
69
Uses a waterfall-style logic to derive an incremental revenue requirement of $29 billion.Pfizer Inc. (PFE) · Starboard Value
Conference presentation Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit