slides · global inventory
Quote
Component collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Matching slides 18,554
Current window 1,951-1,980
Pages 619
Rows per page 30
Component
1,951-1,980 of 18,554
04
Uses authority bias by citing academic experts and industry veterans to discredit the company's board.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott Investment Management
Shareholder letter Activist investor Beat · AgitateLoop · The Reveal3 hits
27
Uses a before-after-bridge structure to highlight the shift in analyst sentiment and propose a turnaround.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Regulatory filing Activist investor Beat · SolutionLoop · Before After3 hits
20
The chart uses a timeline to correlate specific management statements with stock price movements.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)3 hits
21
Uses a bar chart to show TSR performance across three distinct time periods related to activist involvement and leadership change.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)3 hits
29
Uses dual-axis charts to overlay share price performance against a refining margin proxy.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)3 hits
32
The slide uses analyst quotes to reinforce the 'conglomerate discount' thesis.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Iceberg3 hits
34
Uses a padlock icon to symbolize 'trapped' value.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Iceberg3 hits
37
Uses a 'before-after' style framing to contrast management's narrative with reality.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)3 hits
41
Uses a combination of line charts for opex and waterfall/bar charts for EBITDA spread to expose management's narrative.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 3 hits
51
Uses a contrast-pairs framework to highlight the difference in investor transparency between two companies.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 3 hits
53
Uses a callout box to link the chart data to the management's shifting narrative.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 3 hits
54
Uses a bar chart to visually demonstrate the gap between management rhetoric and financial reality.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 3 hits
66
Uses two pull-quotes from academic experts to frame the board's actions as a distraction tactic.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 3 hits
88
The slide uses a 'problem-solution' framing where the asset quality is the 'good' and the operational execution is the 'bad' (the problem to be solved).Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)3 hits
119
Uses a 'Claim vs Reality' framing to expose hypocrisy.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 3 hits
127
Uses a before-after framing to contrast executive quotes with post-separation performance/strategic outcomes.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 3 hits
13
The slide uses a bar chart to visualize survey results and includes two direct quotes from shareholders to reinforce the narrative of management failure.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Regulatory filing Activist investor Beat · DesireLoop · Cost Of Inaction3 hits
11
Includes a visual representation of a proxy card voting guide.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Regulatory filing Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Cost Of Inaction3 hits
31
The slide uses analyst quotes to frame the 'conglomerate discount' problem.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle3 hits
33
Uses a padlock visual metaphor to represent the 'trapped' value.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle3 hits
36
Uses a classic 'Management vs. Reality' framing to expose a contradiction.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle3 hits
40
Uses a combination of line charts for opex and waterfall/bar charts for EBITDA spread to expose management's claims.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle3 hits
50
Uses a contrast-pairs framework to highlight the difference in investor transparency between the two companies.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 3 hits
52
Uses a bar chart to show PSX vs VLO margins over time, with callouts pointing to specific management quotes that contradict the data.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 3 hits
53
Uses a 'ceo-quote-contradiction' framework to highlight the gap between management rhetoric and financial reality.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 3 hits
56
Uses a waterfall-style bridge to show the flow of funds from divestitures to acquisitions.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 3 hits
65
Uses two pull-quotes from academic sources to validate the activist's position.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 3 hits
87
Includes two sell-side quotes as supporting evidence for asset quality.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Victory3 hits
118
Uses a 'before-after' style contradiction to undermine the credibility of a specific director.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 3 hits
126
Uses a 'Before/After' framing to expose the contradiction between past management rhetoric and subsequent strategic actions.Phillips 66 (PSX) · Elliott
Activist deck Activist investor 3 hits