slides · global inventory
Chart
Component collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Matching slides 78,129
Current window 16,891-16,920
Pages 2,605
Rows per page 30
Component
16,891-16,920 of 78,129
06
The chart uses a dual-axis approach: stacked bars for absolute costs and a line for EBITDA margin percentage. Red boxes and lines highlight specific Q3 2017 and Q1 2018 data points related to FlexPot payments.arm | Investor Presentation Deck | 27 slides · Arm
Conference presentation Investor relations Beat · Problem2 hits
06
Includes detailed methodology notes regarding the calculation of organic growth and operating leverage.BlackRock | Investor Conference Presentation Deck | 17 slides · BlackRock
Conference presentation Investor relations Beat · Solution2 hits
12
The slide uses a combination of a bar chart for historical data and a line chart for future projections.BlackRock | Investor Conference Presentation Deck | 17 slides · BlackRock
Conference presentation Investor relations Beat · Market Size2 hits
06
The slide uses a decomposition framework to explain the divergence between AUM growth and Base Fee growth.BlackRock | Investor Conference Presentation Deck | 19 slides · BlackRock
Conference presentation Investor relations Beat · ChallengesLoop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
14
Includes a bar chart for fundraising history and a donut chart for capital allocation by asset class.BlackRock | Investor Conference Presentation Deck | 19 slides · BlackRock
Conference presentation Investor relations Beat · Growth Opportunities2 hits
05
The slide uses a callout box to highlight recent performance trends and includes a legend for event markers A-E.Citi | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 58 slides · Citi
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Pattern Hunter2 hits
20
The slide compares standalone ownership against three pro forma scenarios (1.775x, 1.800x, 1.850x).Citi | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 58 slides · Citi
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
04
The slide compares two valuation methodologies over a 7-month period.Goldman Sachs | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 10 slides · Goldman Sachs
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · FinancialsLoop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
05
Goldman Sachs Investment Banking Division slide.Goldman Sachs | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 10 slides · Goldman Sachs
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · FinancialsLoop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
06
The slide uses two line charts to compare valuation outcomes under different yield assumptions.Goldman Sachs | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 12 slides · Goldman Sachs
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Logic Chain2 hits
10
The slide uses two line charts to compare performance metrics indexed to a specific peak date.Goldman Sachs | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 12 slides · Goldman Sachs
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Solution & Approach2 hits
09
The slide compares absolute and indexed stock prices for two sectors (Midstream and GP) against the AMZ index. Includes a specific beta metric for Midstream.Goldman Sachs | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 20 slides · Goldman Sachs
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Evidence & Proof2 hits
11
The slide compares 'Absolute' vs 'AMZ Indexed' exchange ratios for two different stakeholder perspectives.Goldman Sachs | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 20 slides · Goldman Sachs
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Evidence & Proof2 hits
12
Goldman Sachs Investment Banking Division slide.Goldman Sachs | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 49 slides · Goldman Sachs
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Pattern Hunter2 hits
25
The slide compares two valuation scenarios (Status Quo and Pro Forma) across three years (2019-2021) using varying P/DCF multiples and a constant 9% cost of equity.Goldman Sachs | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 49 slides · Goldman Sachs
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Golden Circle2 hits
04
The slide uses a line chart to show the present value of future share prices across different exit multiples (P/DCF) for two business scenarios.Goldman Sachs | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 6 slides · Goldman Sachs
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
05
Includes specific callouts for dividend impact on ratios in the middle scenario.Goldman Sachs | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 6 slides · Goldman Sachs
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
03
The slide compares two proposals (AR and AM) by decomposing the total consideration into its constituent parts.Goldman Sachs | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 7 slides · Goldman Sachs
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Solution & Approach2 hits
04
The slide uses a dual-bar chart layout to compare two metrics across six distinct proposals.Goldman Sachs | Investment Banking Pitch Book | 7 slides · Goldman Sachs
Consulting deck Investment bank Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Mece Breakdown2 hits
09
Uses a combination of market sizing (GMV) and penetration metrics (active consumers as % of population).Just Eat Takeaway.com | Mergers and Acquisitions Presentation Deck | 15 slides · Takeaway.com
Deck Investment bank Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
08
NNIT | Mergers and Acquisitions Presentation Deck | 11 slidesNNIT | Mergers and Acquisitions Presentation Deck | 11 slides · NNIT
Conference presentation Investment bank Beat · Market SizeLoop · Why Now2 hits
23
The shaded area represents the 'lost' traffic due to the ranking drop.Overstock | Results Presentation Deck | 33 slides · Overstock
Conference presentation Investor relations 2 hits
24
The slide includes a disclaimer about the non-GAAP nature of 'Retail Contribution'.Overstock | Results Presentation Deck | 35 slides · Overstock
Conference presentation Investor relations Beat · Key Performance IndicatorsLoop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
14
The slide uses a mix of dot-based comparison, bar charts, and media clippings to build a narrative of category growth.Pershing Square | Activist Presentation Deck | 43 slides · Pershing Square
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
16
The slide uses a primary bar chart for market share and an inset bar chart for absolute sales volume to emphasize market dominance.Pershing Square | Activist Presentation Deck | 43 slides · Pershing Square
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
08
The slide uses a clear contrast between positive (blue) and negative (red) performance to highlight PPG's underperformance.Trian Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 42 slides · Trian Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem (Identify pain)2 hits
11
Uses a comparison of consensus vs revised guidance to demonstrate a pattern of poor performance.Trian Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 42 slides · Trian Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
15
The slide uses Glassdoor data to highlight a negative trend in internal sentiment compared to industry peers.Trian Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 42 slides · Trian Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
29
The slide highlights a strategic gap between PPG and its primary competitor, Sherwin-Williams.Trian Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 42 slides · Trian Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
39
Uses red X marks to visually emphasize the failure to meet targets.Trian Partners | Activist Presentation Deck | 42 slides · Trian Partners
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)2 hits