anlak storytelling
All kinds
Document kinds
Loading document kinds...

Primary corpus lens for browsing and insights. Selection lives in the URL.

All formats
Orientation
Loading formats...

Landscape, portrait, square, or unknown document geometry.

Unlock
slides · global inventory

Source Note

Component collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.

Search Insights JSON Unlock
Matching slides 110,387
Current window 15,361-15,390
Pages 3,680
Rows per page 30
Component: Source Noteclear collectionreset all
18 30 60

Component

15,361-15,390 of 110,387

filter-aware
32
The chart uses a waterfall-style stacked bar approach to show the composition of TOC, Expenditure, and Revenue requirement.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
35
The slide uses a categorization framework to justify a policy recommendation regarding Network Rail (NR) and Train Operating Companies (TOCs).Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
36
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to visualize the total cost base and a list to justify inclusion/exclusion decisions for specific cost categories.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
38
Includes a quote from a stakeholder regarding the risk of gaming the system.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
40
The table includes adjustments for non-PR08 funded enhancements and deferred expenditure.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
44
The slide compares Vertical Integration (VI) against cost/revenue sharing mechanisms in the context of UK railway structures.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
47
The slide highlights the discrepancy between functional organization and geographical reporting, showing maps for both operating and strategic routes.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
55
The slide uses quotes from stakeholders to emphasize the difficulty of pricing regulatory risk into bids.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
60
The slide uses a two-row table-like structure to contrast two specific cost categories (Freight access charges and EC4T) and the resulting operator engagement.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
61
The slide presents two side-by-side tables comparing TOC and Network Rail financial data for CP4.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
80
The slide is a continuation of a previous list, focusing on options 5 through 8.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
86
The table uses a qualitative scoring system (+, 0, -, --) to assess criteria across two states.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
90
The slide details how L.E.K. applied Oxera's findings on cost expenditure standard deviations to estimate EBS payment impacts.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
91
The slide uses a normal distribution curve to quantify financial risk/volatility.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
92
The chart illustrates the breakeven points (1.8% and 3.7%) for two scenarios of train operator contribution to NR performance.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
93
The slide explains the statistical basis for cost volatility aggregation using standard deviation and covariance formulas.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
94
The slide compares two scenarios based on regional vs national level mechanisms. The data shows how volatility and correlation affect financial outcomes.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
96
The table uses a color-coded qualitative scale (+, 0, --, -) to compare Option 1 (symmetrical) and Option 2 (upside only).Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
117
VTAC stands for Variable Usage Charge (implied context). NR stands for Network Rail.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
121
Includes a testimonial/quote from a European train operator and a specific case example regarding South West Trains.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
122
The slide uses a vertical arrow diagram to represent increasing depth of commercial agreement.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
123
The slide highlights that these deals are currently focused on daily operations rather than long-term maintenance or capital expenditure.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
136
The diagram maps the flow of funds including subsidies, grants, and operational costs.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
137
Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011)Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
138
The slide provides a comprehensive overview of the UK rail market structure at the time of the document.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
140
The slide outlines the regulatory and economic framework for rail freight operators in the UK.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
143
The slide uses a flow diagram to illustrate how expenditure categories feed into the Regulatory Asset Base (RAB) and subsequently into the revenue requirement calculation.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
144
The table provides a financial breakdown of the allowed return components for CP4.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
146
The slide defines the incentive calculation formula and the performance achievement curve.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
147
The slide uses a process flow diagram to explain the incentive distribution mechanism.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit