slides · global inventory
Table
Component collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Matching slides 60,568
Current window 11,131-11,160
Pages 2,019
Rows per page 30
Component
11,131-11,160 of 60,568
78
The table acts as a decision matrix for the 4 selected options.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
79
The slide details specific assumptions for each of the four options, with Option 1 being the most detailed.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
80
The slide is a continuation of a previous list, focusing on options 5 through 8.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
81
The slide serves as a methodology disclosure for the evaluation framework.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
83
The slide uses a scoring system of ++, +, 0, -, -- to evaluate criteria.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
84
The slide uses a color-coded table to map categories and criteria to scores and mitigation actions.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
86
The table uses a qualitative scoring system (+, 0, -, --) to assess criteria across two states.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
93
The slide explains the statistical basis for cost volatility aggregation using standard deviation and covariance formulas.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
96
The table uses a color-coded qualitative scale (+, 0, --, -) to compare Option 1 (symmetrical) and Option 2 (upside only).Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
97
The slide uses a structured table to map specific criteria (A-F) to their performance scores and proposed mitigation actions.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
101
The slide uses a table to compare four scenarios (No sharing, Full sharing, TOC pax and sch 8 revenue shared only, TOC pax revenue shared only) across 'Before', 'After', and 'Change' metrics.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
103
The slide uses a qualitative scoring system (+, ++, 0, -) to evaluate specific criteria for a proposed revenue-sharing mechanism.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
107
The table uses a scoring system (++, +, 0, -, --) to evaluate specific criteria.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
112
The table uses a scoring system of ++, +, 0, -, -- to evaluate criteria.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
113
The table uses a scoring system of ++, +, 0, -, -- to evaluate criteria across categories A-F.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
114
The slide uses a scoring system (++, +, 0, -, --) to evaluate criteria across categories A-F.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
118
The table uses a scoring system of ++, +, 0, -, -- to evaluate criteria.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
128
The table uses a scoring system (++, +, 0) to evaluate specific criteria within each category.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
130
The table uses a color-coded scoring system (red for negative, grey for neutral, green for positive) to evaluate options.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
132
The table uses a traffic light system (green for checkmark, red for X) to indicate implementation status.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
137
Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011)Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
144
The table provides a financial breakdown of the allowed return components for CP4.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
145
The slide outlines the structure of the Management Incentive Plan (MIP) for various executive roles, including performance measures and bonus potential.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
148
The slide details efficiency savings targets across four main programme areas: Asset Management, Efficient Infrastructure Delivery, Access Management, and Network Operations.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
150
The slide uses a three-column layout to categorize industry stakeholders, specific incentive mechanisms, and operational processes.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
153
The slide provides a structural overview of the rail industry's operational and governance framework.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
08
The slide uses a hierarchical list structure to group activities under 'Activities beyond original scope' and 'Deeper support within areas of scope'.Reshaping NYCHA support functions · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
12
The slide serves as an appendix to document the breadth of stakeholder engagement.Reshaping NYCHA support functions · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
28
The slide uses a color-coded matrix to visualize organizational structure and accountability levels.Reshaping NYCHA support functions · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
29
The slide uses a comparison framework to highlight performance gaps.Reshaping NYCHA support functions · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit