anlak storytelling
All kinds
Document kinds
Loading document kinds...

Primary corpus lens for browsing and insights. Selection lives in the URL.

All formats
Orientation
Loading formats...

Landscape, portrait, square, or unknown document geometry.

Unlock
slides · global inventory

Table

Component collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.

Search Insights JSON Unlock
Matching slides 60,568
Current window 11,101-11,130
Pages 2,019
Rows per page 30
Component: Tableclear collectionreset all
18 30 60

Component

11,101-11,130 of 60,568

filter-aware
08
The slide uses a structured table format to present forecast data alongside qualitative drivers.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
14
The slide uses a dark green background typical of BCG decks. It presents qualitative evidence to support a market trend.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
19
The slide uses a dark green background typical of BCG decks. It includes a specific callout for the -44% change in First-Class Mail revenue.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Why Now1 hit
35
Uses Harvey balls to represent qualitative scores for service improvements.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
36
Uses Harvey balls to represent qualitative scores for improvement drivers.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
37
Uses Harvey balls to represent improvement scores.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
38
Uses Harvey balls to represent scores for online advertising improvements.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
39
Uses Harvey balls to represent qualitative scores for online ad improvements.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
40
Uses Harvey balls to represent qualitative scores for online advertising improvements.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
04
The table acts as a decision matrix for the four selected options.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
05
The slide presents a structured comparison of four policy options for financial risk/reward sharing in the rail industry.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
06
The slide continues a list of options, starting from number 5.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
07
The slide lists specific criteria and the corresponding key questions used for evaluation.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
09
The table uses a qualitative scoring system (++, +, 0, -, --) to evaluate options.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
11
The slide uses a traffic light system (green check, red X, question mark) to indicate implementation status for 8 options.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
14
The table uses a qualitative scoring system (+, 0, -) to compare the 'Now' state against the 'After implementing HS with multiple owners' state.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
26
The table uses a color-coded matrix to show which components (NR costs/revenue, TOC revenue, TOC costs) are included or excluded for four specific options.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
27
The slide details four specific regulatory or contractual mechanisms for cost/revenue sharing in the rail industry.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
28
The slide is a continuation of a previous list, focusing on options 5-8.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
34
The table evaluates four scenarios: No sharing, Full sharing, TOC pax and sch 8 revenue shared only, and TOC pax revenue shared only.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
35
The slide uses a categorization framework to justify a policy recommendation regarding Network Rail (NR) and Train Operating Companies (TOCs).Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
37
The table compares 'No sharing', 'Full sharing', 'TOC and NR cost sharing', and 'NR cost sharing only' across P&L items (revenue/cost) for TOC and NR.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
40
The table includes adjustments for non-PR08 funded enhancements and deferred expenditure.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
42
The slide evaluates the appropriateness of cost/revenue sharing mechanisms for each of the three identified influence mechanisms.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
43
The slide uses a standard comparison matrix format to evaluate strategic options.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
44
The slide compares Vertical Integration (VI) against cost/revenue sharing mechanisms in the context of UK railway structures.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
59
The slide presents a framework for incentive alignment in cost/revenue sharing.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
66
The slide uses a comparison table structure to evaluate policy options for secondary users.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
74
The slide evaluates 'Gradual roll-out', 'Big bang introduction', and 'Combined' approaches.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
76
The table provides a clear mapping of contractual vs. assumed timelines for rail franchises, highlighting specific regulatory or operational reasons for deviations.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit