slides · global inventory
Title
Component collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Matching slides 303,834
Current window 10,351-10,380
Pages 10,128
Rows per page 30
Component
10,351-10,380 of 303,834
32
The chart illustrates a bridge from 23.7B to 26.2B volume.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 2 hits
33
The chart uses a waterfall structure to decompose the net change in volume between two points in time.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 2 hits
35
Uses Harvey balls to represent qualitative scores for service improvements.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 2 hits
36
Uses Harvey balls to represent qualitative scores for improvement drivers.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 2 hits
37
Uses Harvey balls to represent improvement scores.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 2 hits
38
Uses Harvey balls to represent scores for online advertising improvements.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 2 hits
39
Uses Harvey balls to represent qualitative scores for online ad improvements.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 2 hits
40
Uses Harvey balls to represent qualitative scores for online advertising improvements.Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 2 hits
10
Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011)Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication2 hits
14
The table uses a qualitative scoring system (+, 0, -) to compare the 'Now' state against the 'After implementing HS with multiple owners' state.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication2 hits
16
L.E.K. consulting slide regarding rail industry cost and revenue sharing.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication2 hits
17
L.E.K. consulting slide discussing rail industry cost and revenue sharing mechanisms.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication2 hits
18
The slide uses a central arrow to represent the 'Cultural change' required to bridge the two approaches.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication2 hits
20
The slide uses a 'carrot vs stick' metaphor to describe the strategic approach to industry partnerships.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication2 hits
24
The slide clarifies that the study assumes no radical changes to the roles of train operators or Network Rail.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Golden Circle2 hits
37
The table compares 'No sharing', 'Full sharing', 'TOC and NR cost sharing', and 'NR cost sharing only' across P&L items (revenue/cost) for TOC and NR.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach2 hits
44
The slide compares Vertical Integration (VI) against cost/revenue sharing mechanisms in the context of UK railway structures.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof2 hits
46
The slide discusses 'option value' in the context of rail franchise bidding and Value for Money (VfM).Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof2 hits
51
The slide argues that the underlying data requirements and mapping challenges remain largely the same regardless of the chosen geographic entity.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof2 hits
54
The slide discusses the potential impact of the McNulty Rail VfM review on TOC business models.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
55
The slide uses quotes from stakeholders to emphasize the difficulty of pricing regulatory risk into bids.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
56
Discusses RPI-X regulation, capex/opex reclassification risks, and ORR/NR/TOC incentive alignment.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction2 hits
57
L.E.K. consulting slide, page 56.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof2 hits
60
The slide uses a two-row table-like structure to contrast two specific cost categories (Freight access charges and EC4T) and the resulting operator engagement.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof2 hits
61
The slide presents two side-by-side tables comparing TOC and Network Rail financial data for CP4.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps2 hits
68
The slide highlights the misalignment between current management structures and the proposed geographic reporting requirements.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps2 hits
87
Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011)Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 2 hits
90
The slide details how L.E.K. applied Oxera's findings on cost expenditure standard deviations to estimate EBS payment impacts.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 2 hits
91
The slide uses a normal distribution curve to quantify financial risk/volatility.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 2 hits
92
The chart illustrates the breakeven points (1.8% and 3.7%) for two scenarios of train operator contribution to NR performance.Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011) · L.E.K.
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 2 hits