anlak storytelling
All kinds
Document kinds
Loading document kinds...

Primary corpus lens for browsing and insights. Selection lives in the URL.

All formats
Orientation
Loading formats...

Landscape, portrait, square, or unknown document geometry.

Unlock
slides · global inventory

Callout

Component collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.

Search Insights JSON Unlock
Matching slides 96,741
Current window 95,311-95,340
Pages 3,225
Rows per page 30
Component: Calloutclear collectionreset all
18 30 60

Component

95,311-95,340 of 96,741

filter-aware
03
The diagram is a circular Venn-like representation of three core pillars.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
07
The slide uses checkmarks to indicate when savings are realized across FY16, FY17, FY18, and one-time events.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
08
The chart uses a waterfall-style breakdown to illustrate the allocation of the $17,455 total per pupil spend.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
10
The slide uses a 2x2 matrix-like layout to contrast 'experienced' vs 'desired' values, with arrows highlighting the shift in perception for 'Bureaucracy' and 'Accountability'.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
11
The chart uses a combination of a bar chart for school counts and a line chart for student population to illustrate the mismatch.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
13
The slide uses a causal flow structure (savings/sales leading to reinvestment outcomes).5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
14
The slide uses a hierarchical tree diagram to decompose the budget.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
22
The slide uses a pie chart to visualize budget allocation percentages.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
25
The slide highlights that ARRA and grant funding have limited flexibility.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
29
The chart uses a waterfall-style visualization to decompose total per-pupil spending into functional categories.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
30
The slide uses a hierarchical tree structure to decompose total SPED spending.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
33
The slide includes a callout box explaining the recent shift in shares.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
35
Includes a bar chart of state-level data and a stacked bar chart of district-type distribution.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
38
The chart highlights a 10% growth in Boston's ELL population, representing a raw increase of 7,656 students.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
41
The slide uses NAEP TUDA data to compare Boston Public Schools (BPS) against national and large city averages.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
42
The slide uses NAEP TUDA data to track longitudinal performance trends.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
43
The slide highlights a persistent performance gap between BPS and the state, with a slight narrowing trend by 10th grade.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
44
The slide uses four line charts to demonstrate a persistent performance gap.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
45
The slide uses line charts to show longitudinal performance trends. The callout box summarizes the key takeaway regarding BPS ELL performance relative to state benchmarks.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
46
The slide uses line charts to compare performance trends over time (2000-2014) for different student demographics.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
47
The slide uses scatter plots with trend lines to demonstrate a negative correlation between SWD share and performance, specifically calling out Boston as an outlier.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
48
The slide uses a scatter plot with a trend line to demonstrate that Boston (BPS) performs above the expected regression line for its ELL population size.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
49
The chart shows a persistent gap between BPS and the state average, despite both showing upward trends.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
53
The slide includes a 'DRAFT' watermark and proprietary footer.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
55
The chart highlights Boston (BPS) in a darker blue color compared to the other peer cities.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
56
The chart uses a dual-axis approach to show FTEs (bars) and student population (line).5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
61
The slide uses a color-coded legend (red triangle, yellow diamond, green triangle) to indicate status for each functional area.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
64
The matrix uses a color-coded system (Green, Yellow, Grey) to categorize initiatives into Quick Wins, Long-term goals, and Not a priority.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
74
The chart uses a grouped bar format to show year-over-year change for multiple cities.5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
76
The slide uses horizontal bar charts to compare Boston (orange) against other districts (blue).5 March 2015 McKinsey BPS Operational Review Steering Committee Working · 5-march-2015-mckinsey-bps-operational-review-steering-committee-working
Deck Investor relations Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit