slides · global inventory
Paragraph
Component collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Matching slides 118,471
Current window 84,871-84,900
Pages 3,950
Rows per page 30
Component
84,871-84,900 of 118,471
121
Uses a bar chart to compare original targets, threshold, revised targets, and actual performance to highlight the contradiction between stated policy and actual outcomes.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
123
The chart uses a specific calculation for skewness: (100% less minimum percentage) / (maximum percentage less 100%).Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
124
The slide highlights a lack of alignment in peer selection, suggesting potential governance issues.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
125
The slide uses a bar chart to highlight a governance failure where the company benchmarks against lower-performing peers to make compensation targets easier to hit.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
126
The slide uses a checkmark/cross matrix to visualize peer group volatility.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
127
The chart uses a blue dashed line to indicate the peer group average of $0.3M, with HUN highlighted in red.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
128
The slide uses a map to visualize flight frequency to leisure destinations, framing it as a governance issue.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
129
Uses LinkedIn screenshots to prove the existence of dedicated aviation staff.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
131
Uses red dashed boxes to highlight specific board members targeted for removal.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
133
Uses red dashed boxes to highlight specific board members targeted for replacement.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
134
Uses a timeline-based visual to contrast board composition over time, emphasizing the 'sham' nature of the refreshment process.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
135
Uses a timeline framework to highlight contradictions between the Board's stated 'pre-planned' process and their actual reactive behavior.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
136
Uses a before-and-after visual comparison to imply poor governance and reactive decision-making.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
137
Uses a side-by-side comparison framework to attack specific board members.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
139
The slide uses a timeline-like structure to build a case against the nominee's integrity.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
140
Uses red dashed boxes to indicate specific board members targeted for removal.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
142
Uses red dashed boxes to identify targets for replacement and red rounded rectangles to list specific governance failures.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
144
Uses quotes from ISS and Glass Lewis to establish industry consensus against the Board's action.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
146
Uses a numbered list to highlight three specific governance failures.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
147
The slide uses a timeline to establish a pattern of behavior (precedent) to discredit the board members.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
148
Uses red dashed boxes to indicate target nominees for replacement.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
150
Uses a split-layout comparing committee members (left) with specific ESG failures (right).Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
151
The chart highlights a ratings downgrade for Huntsman while peers have maintained or improved their ratings.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
152
The slide uses a red 'x' and green checkmark system to highlight Huntsman's deficiencies in ESG metrics.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
153
Uses a chronological contrast-pair structure to highlight corporate inaction.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
154
The slide uses a checkmark/cross system to highlight the gap between Huntsman and its peers.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
157
The slide uses a list-based structure to build a case against a specific board member.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
158
The slide uses a 'villain critique' structure to isolate a specific board member's track record.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
159
The slide uses a list-based structure to build a case against a specific board member.Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
161
Huntsman Corporation (HUN)Huntsman Corporation (HUN) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit