anlak storytelling
All kinds
Document kinds
Loading document kinds...

Primary corpus lens for browsing and insights. Selection lives in the URL.

All formats
Orientation
Loading formats...

Landscape, portrait, square, or unknown document geometry.

Unlock
slides · global inventory

Source Note

Component collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.

Search Insights JSON Unlock
Matching slides 110,355
Current window 78,421-78,450
Pages 3,679
Rows per page 30
Component: Source Noteclear collectionreset all
18 30 60

Component

78,421-78,450 of 110,355

filter-aware
24
The slide uses a highlighted excerpt from a third-party report to undermine the company's R&D track record.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)1 hit
25
The slide uses a screenshot of a press release to validate the claim of continued product success.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)1 hit
26
The slide uses analyst quotes to build a case for competitive pressure on Pfizer's core product.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)1 hit
27
The slide uses a direct quote from a press release to highlight a clinical trial failure.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)1 hit
28
The slide uses a primary source excerpt to establish the clinical efficacy and subsequent commercial success of the drug.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)1 hit
29
The slide uses a screenshot of a news article as evidence.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)1 hit
32
Uses highlighted text to draw attention to specific claims within the quotes.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
33
The slide highlights the skepticism of Wall Street analysts regarding management's projections.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
34
Uses a 'villain critique' style to undermine management's R&D track record.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
35
The chart highlights the massive gap between company optimism and market reality.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
36
The chart highlights the divergence in GLP-1 success between the two peers and the implied laggard (Pfizer).Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
39
The chart uses a 'broken axis' visual style for the top two bars (LLY, NVO) to accommodate their significantly higher growth rates.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
40
The chart uses a broken axis for the top two performers (NVO, LLY) to accommodate the scale.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
42
The slide highlights the scale of capital allocation into M&A, framing it as a potential misuse of COVID-19 windfall cash.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
43
The slide uses a visual comparison to contrast the $70B spend against the $20.5B revenue target, implying poor capital allocation.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
44
The chart uses a red bar to emphasize the outlier status of the 'PFE Consolidated Deals (Mgmt)' metric.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
45
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to contrast company expectations ($20.5bn) against sell-side consensus ($13.3bn).Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
46
The chart highlights the discrepancy between management's valuation assumptions and consensus expectations.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
47
The slide uses a combination of a table and a bar chart to illustrate the delta in valuation.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
48
Uses a press release excerpt with annotations to build a valuation argument.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
49
The slide uses a direct quote/screenshot from a press release to undermine the value of a previous acquisition (GBT).Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
50
The slide uses analyst quotes to frame Pfizer's acquisition strategy as flawed.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
52
Uses checkmarks and X marks to visualize performance; highlights 2021-2022 as a 'COVID Benefit' period.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
53
The chart uses color coding (red bars) to emphasize Pfizer's lower consistency compared to the peer group.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
54
Uses red 'X' icons to visually emphasize the failure to meet expectations.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
55
The slide uses a waterfall-like annotation to explain the drop in sales from 2022 to 2023.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
56
The slide uses a chart to highlight management's optimistic outlook, likely to contrast with actual performance or market skepticism.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
57
The slide uses a red color for the actuals bar and the annotation to emphasize the negative performance.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
58
Uses red color coding to emphasize the negative performance and missed guidance.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
59
Uses a red-blue contrast to emphasize the negative gap between market expectations and company guidance.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit