slides · global inventory
Chart
Component collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Matching slides 78,138
Current window 77,731-77,760
Pages 2,605
Rows per page 30
Component
77,731-77,760 of 78,138
07
The slide uses a bar chart for survey data and a check-mark matrix for qualitative risk associations.McKinsey King County and Seattle Homelessness Some Facts · mckinsey-king-county-and-seattle-homelessness-some-facts
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
08
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to compare population distributions and a table to show the relative rate difference (homeless vs general).McKinsey King County and Seattle Homelessness Some Facts · mckinsey-king-county-and-seattle-homelessness-some-facts
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
09
The chart uses a combination of bar (PIT count) and line (FMR) to illustrate the correlation, with a CAGR callout for the rent increase.McKinsey King County and Seattle Homelessness Some Facts · mckinsey-king-county-and-seattle-homelessness-some-facts
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
10
The map uses a color-coded scale to represent affordability levels across different zip codes in Seattle.McKinsey King County and Seattle Homelessness Some Facts · mckinsey-king-county-and-seattle-homelessness-some-facts
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
11
The map uses color-coding to represent affordability tiers based on AMI percentages.McKinsey King County and Seattle Homelessness Some Facts · mckinsey-king-county-and-seattle-homelessness-some-facts
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
12
The map uses a choropleth visualization to categorize zip codes by affordability tiers relative to AMI.McKinsey King County and Seattle Homelessness Some Facts · mckinsey-king-county-and-seattle-homelessness-some-facts
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
13
The chart uses a waterfall structure to bridge current supply to future demand, highlighting the supply gap and homelessness risk.McKinsey King County and Seattle Homelessness Some Facts · mckinsey-king-county-and-seattle-homelessness-some-facts
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
18
The chart shows a clear upward trend in housing exits, with specific growth percentages annotated for the periods 2014-2015 and 2016-2017.McKinsey King County and Seattle Homelessness Some Facts · mckinsey-king-county-and-seattle-homelessness-some-facts
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
19
The chart uses a stacked bar comparison to illustrate the mismatch between homeless households and available housing supply.McKinsey King County and Seattle Homelessness Some Facts · mckinsey-king-county-and-seattle-homelessness-some-facts
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
23
The slide uses a dual-waterfall structure to illustrate the system flow and the required housing interventions.McKinsey King County and Seattle Homelessness Some Facts · mckinsey-king-county-and-seattle-homelessness-some-facts
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
04
The chart displays a clear correlation between industry downturns and the percentage of players with negative cash flow.McKinsey Laying the foundations for a financially sound industry · mckinsey-laying-the-foundations-for-a-financially-sound-industry
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & ContextLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
05
The chart uses vertical dashed lines to delineate three phases: Pre-2003, 2003-2008, and 2008-2012.McKinsey Laying the foundations for a financially sound industry · mckinsey-laying-the-foundations-for-a-financially-sound-industry
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
06
The chart includes an annotation explaining the 2004-2008 period as a credit bubble-driven sustainability peak.McKinsey Laying the foundations for a financially sound industry · mckinsey-laying-the-foundations-for-a-financially-sound-industry
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
08
The chart uses a waterfall structure to bridge from 2012 EBITDA to the required sustainable EBITDA level.McKinsey Laying the foundations for a financially sound industry · mckinsey-laying-the-foundations-for-a-financially-sound-industry
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
09
The chart illustrates the required EBITDA margin (25-30%) for new capacity compared to typical industry EBITDA.McKinsey Laying the foundations for a financially sound industry · mckinsey-laying-the-foundations-for-a-financially-sound-industry
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
11
The chart uses a waterfall structure to show margin decline components.McKinsey Laying the foundations for a financially sound industry · mckinsey-laying-the-foundations-for-a-financially-sound-industry
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
13
The slide uses a logic tree to define drivers and a waterfall-style cost curve chart to illustrate the relationship between price, demand, and cost.McKinsey Laying the foundations for a financially sound industry · mckinsey-laying-the-foundations-for-a-financially-sound-industry
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
14
The chart uses bubble size to represent the EBITDA pool. The trend line suggests a positive correlation between cost curve steepness and profitability.McKinsey Laying the foundations for a financially sound industry · mckinsey-laying-the-foundations-for-a-financially-sound-industry
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
16
The slide uses a dual-axis chart to show the relationship between capacity utilization, EBITDA margin, and capacity closure needs.McKinsey Laying the foundations for a financially sound industry · mckinsey-laying-the-foundations-for-a-financially-sound-industry
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
07
The chart uses a waterfall-bridge style gap visualization to highlight the £30bn delta.McKinsey Modelling the potential of digitally enabled processes transparency and participation in the NHS · mckinsey-modelling-the-potential-of-digitally-enabled-processes-transparency-and
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
08
The slide uses a series of bar charts to compare IT spending across five categories: All IT spend, External, Internal, Data centres/infrastructure, and Telecoms.McKinsey Modelling the potential of digitally enabled processes transparency and participation in the NHS · mckinsey-modelling-the-potential-of-digitally-enabled-processes-transparency-and
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
11
The chart illustrates the delta between baseline spend growth and modelled impact scenarios.McKinsey Modelling the potential of digitally enabled processes transparency and participation in the NHS · mckinsey-modelling-the-potential-of-digitally-enabled-processes-transparency-and
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
20
The chart uses a stacked bar format to illustrate the composition of IT expenditure across different segments of the NHS.McKinsey Modelling the potential of digitally enabled processes transparency and participation in the NHS · mckinsey-modelling-the-potential-of-digitally-enabled-processes-transparency-and
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
03
The slide uses a Big Mac as a proxy for inflation, likely to contrast with higher inflation rates in the UKCS (United Kingdom Continental Shelf) industry.McKinsey Restoring Economic Health to the North Sea · mckinsey-restoring-economic-health-to-the-north-sea
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
04
Uses a Big Mac index analogy to illustrate the severity of cost inflation in the UK Continental Shelf (UKCS) oil and gas sector.McKinsey Restoring Economic Health to the North Sea · mckinsey-restoring-economic-health-to-the-north-sea
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
05
The slide uses a visual metaphor (Big Mac index) to contrast general consumer inflation with specific industry cost inflation.McKinsey Restoring Economic Health to the North Sea · mckinsey-restoring-economic-health-to-the-north-sea
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
06
Uses the Big Mac index as a benchmark for general inflation.McKinsey Restoring Economic Health to the North Sea · mckinsey-restoring-economic-health-to-the-north-sea
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
08
The chart illustrates the 'forecast vs actual' gap, highlighting that industry expectations were consistently too optimistic.McKinsey Restoring Economic Health to the North Sea · mckinsey-restoring-economic-health-to-the-north-sea
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
09
The slide uses a simple metric comparison to highlight the sensitivity of North Sea assets to oil price drops.McKinsey Restoring Economic Health to the North Sea · mckinsey-restoring-economic-health-to-the-north-sea
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
11
The chart illustrates a cross-over point around 2012-2013 where decommissioning activity began to outpace new exploration.McKinsey Restoring Economic Health to the North Sea · mckinsey-restoring-economic-health-to-the-north-sea
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Logic Chain1 hit