slides · global inventory
Paragraph
Component collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Matching slides 118,471
Current window 72,841-72,870
Pages 3,950
Rows per page 30
Component
72,841-72,870 of 118,471
65
Uses red circles to highlight the 'Multiple of AOL' for market cap, emphasizing the size disparity.AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
66
The slide uses a table to demonstrate that the independent peer group's market cap and revenue fall within the recommended guidelines, unlike the company's own selection.AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
67
The chart uses a dashed box to visually represent the ISS/Glass Lewis guideline boundaries for peer selection.AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
68
The slide uses a 'YES'/'NO' column to highlight compliance with proxy advisory firm guidelines.AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
70
The chart uses a red dashed line to indicate the median of the peer group.AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
72
Includes a red circle annotation around the 3.4x figure.AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
73
The slide uses a 'villain' framing by highlighting the lack of disclosure as a deliberate act to obscure value from shareholders.AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
75
AOL, Inc. (AOL)AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Propose SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
77
AOL, Inc. (AOL)AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Propose SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
79
Uses a combination of a summary table and a line chart to demonstrate alpha generation.AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
80
Uses a contrast-pairs framework to highlight the causal link between activist pressure and management action.AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
81
The slide uses a 4-column table to contrast Starboard's suggestions against AOL's past and present statements, highlighting the shift in strategy.AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
84
The slide uses a hub-and-spoke diagram to visualize conflicts of interest.AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
85
The slide uses the 'lack of skin in the game' argument to undermine board credibility.AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
86
Includes visual evidence (screenshots) of ISS and Glass Lewis reports recommending against Stengel and rating compensation as 'Poor'.AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
87
Uses external authority citations to undermine the credibility of a board nominee.AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
94
AOL, Inc. (AOL)AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
95
AOL, Inc. (AOL)AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
05
Office Depot, Inc. (ODP)Office Depot, Inc. (ODP) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
06
The slide uses a list-based argument structure to justify the need for new board members.Office Depot, Inc. (ODP) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
07
The slide uses a contrast-based structure to frame the nominees as superior and the incumbents as underperforming.Office Depot, Inc. (ODP) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
12
Includes a summary table of returns and three line charts showing 5-year, 3-year, and 1-year performance.Office Depot, Inc. (ODP) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The MonsterLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
13
Uses red callout boxes to emphasize negative trends (declines in revenue/EBITDA, increases in G&A).Office Depot, Inc. (ODP) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The MonsterLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
14
The slide uses two bar charts to illustrate negative performance trends.Office Depot, Inc. (ODP) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The MonsterLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
15
The slide highlights a 'Market Share Gap' between the declining Office Depot and the growing Staples.Office Depot, Inc. (ODP) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The MonsterLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
19
The slide uses a red 'X' and green checkmark to visually contrast the lack of experience among the majority of the board.Office Depot, Inc. (ODP) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
21
This is a classic activist investor 'case for change' slide, highlighting poor performance metrics and board incompetence.Office Depot, Inc. (ODP) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
23
Uses a narrative structure to expose board entrenchment tactics.Office Depot, Inc. (ODP) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
24
The slide uses a data table to contrast the Board's increasing voting power against the dilution of other shareholders.Office Depot, Inc. (ODP) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
30
Uses authority-citation to build a case against the current board.Office Depot, Inc. (ODP) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit