Matching slides 118,471
Current window 72,481-72,510
Pages 3,950
Rows per page 30
Component: Paragraphclear collectionreset all

Component

72,481-72,510 of 118,471

filter-aware
41
Uses a combination of line charts for opex and waterfall/bar charts for EBITDA spread to expose management's narrative.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
42
The slide uses a 'villain critique' style to contrast management's claims with hard data.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
43
The chart highlights a performance gap between PSX and its peers, contradicting management's claims of cost-cutting progress.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
44
Uses a stool metaphor to represent the four legs of the business.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
45
Uses a bar chart to highlight PSX's negative growth vs. peers and visual asset maps to show lack of expansion.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
47
Uses analyst quotes to frame the poor performance as a catalyst for the activist campaign.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
48
The chart uses a dashed red line for PSX and solid lines for peer averages, with a shaded region indicating the period of preview calls.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
49
Uses a 'Management Entrenchment' vs 'Reality' framework to highlight credibility gaps.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
50
Uses a 'before-after' style contradiction framework to undermine management credibility.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
52
Uses a 'before-after' style comparison to highlight management failure.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
53
Uses a callout box to link the chart data to the management's shifting narrative.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
54
Uses a bar chart to visually demonstrate the gap between management rhetoric and financial reality.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
56
Uses a 'villain' framing by highlighting management's failure to meet financial projections.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
57
Uses a waterfall-style bridge to show the flow of capital from divestitures to acquisitions.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
58
The slide uses market performance data to argue that management failed to capitalize on a high-value asset, contrasting PSX performance with the strong performance of midstream peers.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
59
Uses a before-after framing to contrast management's initial promises with current reality.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
60
The slide uses a 'villain' framing by highlighting negative investor quotes about the CEO and board.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
62
The slide uses a 'before-after' framing to highlight the impact of Elliott's engagement on investor interest.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
63
Uses a quote from the Lead Independent Director to expose a contradiction in governance standards.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
66
Uses two pull-quotes from academic experts to frame the board's actions as a distraction tactic.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
67
Uses a combination of bar charts and a callout quote to highlight the misalignment between performance and pay.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
72
The slide uses stacked bar charts to demonstrate that PSX's midstream portfolio is high-quality and comparable to pure-play midstream peers.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
74
The slide uses a four-column layout with checkmark icons to present the core thesis for the proposed spin-off.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
75
Uses a 'Company Claim' vs 'Reality' framework to systematically dismantle management's arguments.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
77
The chart highlights a valuation gap between PSX and its peers/precedent transactions.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
79
Uses a before-after/problem-solution framing to advocate for leadership and cultural changes.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
80
Includes a direct quote from the nominee regarding the need for an operating review.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
83
The slide uses a matrix structure to contrast operational strengths and weaknesses by region.Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
88
The slide uses a 'problem-solution' framing where the asset quality is the 'good' and the operational execution is the 'bad' (the problem to be solved).Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
89
Phillips 66 (PSX)Phillips 66 (PSX) · 02_Elliott_Management
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit