slides · global inventory
List
Component collection for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Matching slides 110,471
Current window 68,071-68,100
Pages 3,683
Rows per page 30
Component
68,071-68,100 of 110,471
46
The slide uses a red circle to highlight the ($285) million loss figure in the table.AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
47
Uses a hub-and-spoke diagram to illustrate traffic sources to AOL.com.AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
48
Uses a simple flow diagram to visualize the lack of traffic contribution.AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
49
Uses a bar chart to contrast 'Length of Stay' between AOL.com and pre-acquisition Huffington Post to challenge AOL's strategic rationale.AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
56
Includes a screenshot of an ISS Proxy Alert report.AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
57
Includes a screenshot of the original Glass Lewis proxy paper with a red circle highlighting the 'Poor' rating.AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
59
Uses a scatter plot with a broken axis to highlight the outlier status of the peer group relative to the guidelines.AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
63
The chart uses a blue dashed box to represent the 'best practice' zone defined by ISS/Glass Lewis guidelines.AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
66
The slide uses a table to demonstrate that the independent peer group's market cap and revenue fall within the recommended guidelines, unlike the company's own selection.AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
69
Uses a red box to highlight the outlier performance of AOL compared to peer percentiles.AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
71
The slide uses a red box to highlight the discrepancy between AOL's performance (0th percentile) and compensation (91st/60th percentile).AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
76
Includes detailed footnotes explaining the derivation of the $150M loss estimate and ad fill rates.AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Propose SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
78
AOL, Inc. (AOL)AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
89
AOL, Inc. (AOL)AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
90
AOL, Inc. (AOL)AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
92
AOL, Inc. (AOL)AOL, Inc. (AOL) · Jeffrey C. Smith
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
03
This is a classic activist investor 'problem statement' slide, establishing the 'why' behind the campaign.Office Depot, Inc. (ODP) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
04
This is a classic activist investor 'thesis' slide, framing the board change as a 'no-regrets' move.Office Depot, Inc. (ODP) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
06
The slide uses a list-based argument structure to justify the need for new board members.Office Depot, Inc. (ODP) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
08
Office Depot, Inc. (ODP)Office Depot, Inc. (ODP) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
10
Uses a timeline-annotated line chart to frame the activist's intervention as the catalyst for value creation.Office Depot, Inc. (ODP) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
21
This is a classic activist investor 'case for change' slide, highlighting poor performance metrics and board incompetence.Office Depot, Inc. (ODP) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
25
Uses a narrative of 'playing games' and 'disingenuous' behavior to frame the Board's actions as a governance failure.Office Depot, Inc. (ODP) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
27
The slide uses a rhetorical question at the bottom to emphasize the governance failure.Office Depot, Inc. (ODP) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
29
Uses a narrative structure to build a case against the Board's independence.Office Depot, Inc. (ODP) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
39
Uses a 'failed' callout to highlight the board's inaction.Office Depot, Inc. (ODP) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
41
The slide uses a bold 'FAILED' stamp and red italicized text to emphasize ISS's negative conclusion on non-independent directors.Office Depot, Inc. (ODP) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Monster1 hit
42
Uses a table to contrast individual director tenure and share purchases to support the argument of lack of alignment.Office Depot, Inc. (ODP) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
46
This slide is part of an activist campaign by Starboard Value targeting Office Depot's board.Office Depot, Inc. (ODP) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The Struggle1 hit
49
This is a classic activist investor 'case for change' slide, focusing on historical underperformance and board incompetence.Office Depot, Inc. (ODP) · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · The StruggleLoop · Jobs To Be Done1 hit